On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:27:00 +0100
> martin f krafft wrote:
>
>> also sprach Neil Brown [2010.02.23.0330 +0100]:
>> > The problem to protect against is any consequence of rearranging
>> > devices while the host is off, including attaching devi
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Chase Douglas
wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 12:02 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Chase Douglas
>> wrote:
>> > I have uploaded a new version of the linux-firmware-nonfree package to:
>> >
>> > http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~cndougl
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:27:00 +0100
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Neil Brown [2010.02.23.0330 +0100]:
> > The problem to protect against is any consequence of rearranging
> > devices while the host is off, including attaching devices that
> > previously were attached to a different compute
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 571003 linux-2.6
Bug #571003 [udev] udev: update-initramfs fails after updating udev to 151-2
Bug reassigned from package 'udev' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions udev/151-2.
> forcemerge 570321 571003
Bug#570321:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:39:10AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.26-19
> Severity: important
>
> We get the following backtrace way too often, it repeats for all CPUs,
> but I'm pasting it only once here.
Does this error still occur with 2.6.26-21 from the latest
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:57:03 +0100
with message-id <20100223215703.ga26...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: message: kernel BUG a mm/rmap.c:522!
has caused the Debian Bug report #457775,
regarding message: kernel BUG a mm/rmap.c:522!
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:57:03 +0100
with message-id <20100223215703.ga26...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: message: kernel BUG a mm/rmap.c:522!
has caused the Debian Bug report #457775,
regarding kernel: Kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:522
to be marked as done.
This means that y
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:06:41PM +0100, Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
> Here is my solution to this problem, lenny xen kernel:
> * dom0 with clocksource=jiffies and /proc/sys/xen/independent_wallclock=0
> * domU with clocksource=jiffies and /proc/sys/xen/independent_wallclock=0
> * ntpdate/ntp only
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:53:00 +0100
with message-id <20100223215300.ga26...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#456339: lm-sensors: couldn't get subfeature on applesmc
has caused the Debian Bug report #456339,
regarding lm-sensors: couldn't get subfeature on applesmc
to be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 570321 linux-2.6
Bug #570321 [linux-2.6] hangs while installing
Ignoring request to reassign bug #570321 to the same package
> forcemerge 570321 571003
Bug#570321: hangs while installing
Bug#571003: udev: update-initramfs fails after upda
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 552706 moreinfo
Bug #552706 [linux-2.6] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! -
:nfs:nfs_access_cache_shrinker
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:31:23 +0100
with message-id <20100223213123.ga23...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#563607: linux-source-2.6.30: Will not boot past the
beginning of the GUI in Xwindow -- Window manager dies
has caused the Debian Bug report #563607,
regarding l
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:58:49PM -0800, Florea Bogdan Florin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We use a linux box for routing and traffic shaping (we have a few thousand ip
> addresses routed through this box) and the soft interrupt load is very high.
> We use linux kernel 2.6.32.7 on an Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Q
Hello,
We use a linux box for routing and traffic shaping (we have a few thousand ip
addresses routed through this box) and the soft interrupt load is very high.
We use linux kernel 2.6.32.7 on an Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @
2.40GHz.
Cpu1 serves an internal network interface, and Cpu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 570321 important
Bug #570321 [linux-2.6] hangs while installing
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> forcemerge 570321 571003
Bug#570321: hangs while installing
Bug#571003: udev: update-initramfs fails after updating udev to 151-2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 568421 linux-2.6
Bug #568421 [xserver-xorg] X hangs after upgrade from 7.4 to 7.5
Bug reassigned from package 'xserver-xorg' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions xorg/1:7.5+3.
> retitle 568421 Xorg locked in vga_get
B
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:20:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#529165: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.18-1um-2etch.26etch2
has caused the Debian Bug report #529165,
regarding OOPS in bridging code
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:20:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#562525: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.18-1um-2etch.26etch2
has caused the Debian Bug report #562525,
regarding linux-2.6: [s390] Etch proposed-updates kernel boot failure
to be marked as done.
This means that y
I've got 2 different intel Boards, both with squeeze ( kernel 2.6.32
AMD) and pci 10ec:8180 (rtl8180 wireless-G PCI Adapter ENLWI-G2 from
Encore). In one board, DG33BU, wireless works fine since lenny. On the
other one, DG31PR, it happens what is described below for the kernel
2.6.26.
I've check ex
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:03:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#562525: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch2
has caused the Debian Bug report #562525,
regarding linux-2.6: [s390] Etch proposed-updates kernel boot failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Notes:
Mapping oldstable-security to oldstable-proposed-updates.
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch2.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch2.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch2.dsc
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch2.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18.
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:55:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#562525: fixed in fai-kernels 1.17+etch.26etch2
has caused the Debian Bug report #562525,
regarding linux-2.6: [s390] Etch proposed-updates kernel boot failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:55:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#529165: fixed in fai-kernels 1.17+etch.26etch2
has caused the Debian Bug report #529165,
regarding OOPS in bridging code
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 01:00:13PM -0400, Maximi89 wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=284730
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=326723
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=326723
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.15/+bu
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 02:44:30PM -0400, Francis wrote:
> The bug is into the megaraid_mbox driver. I tried Yellow Dog Linux 6.1
> and the installer also crash when it's loading this driver.
Hi,
The next release of Debian (6.0, code name Squeeze) will be based
on 2.6.32. Please test the current
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 09:16:37PM +0100, Oliver Vollmer wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26
> Version: 2.6.26-10.00.Custom
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi, after some time recording with this soundcard the "soundcard" hangs up,
> nothing works any longer, no play no recording, in kern.log it get:
> Ma
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 07:09:51PM +, mar...@inventati.org wrote:
>
>
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64
> Version: 2.6.26-13
> Severity: critical
>
> I am experiencing I/O errors on various hosts equipped with a
> 3ware raid controller, 8 GB RAM and running a 2.6.26 Linux kernel.
>
> E
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 522592 moreinfo
Bug #522592 [linux-2.6] Problems with TULIP DAVICOM DM9102
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:00:48PM +0200, Nadav Kavalerchik wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64
> Version: 2.6.26-13
> Severity: normal
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> ACPI: EC: missing confirmations, switch off interrupt mode.
> ACPI Exception (evregion-0420): A
tags 563607 moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 11:56:47AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010, Willy Gommel wrote:
>
> > That is how I accessed the linux-*source* for 2.6.32-3, which I had
> > to have to give you the feedback that I did. ;) Namely, that 2.6.32
> > also has
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 05:28:06AM -0500,
reportbugimage261486.to.pee...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-486
> Version: 2.6.26-8
> Severity: normal
>
>
> On a clean lenny install on my acer aspire 1350, the built-in realtek
> wireless with pci id 10ec:8180 won't connect wi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 520119 moreinfo
Bug #520119 [linux-2.6] ppc64: soft lockup - cpu#0 and backtrace
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:53:17 +0100
with message-id <20100223185317.ga3...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Spammy "MD5 Hash NOT expected but found" messages
has caused the Debian Bug report #519756,
regarding Spammy "MD5 Hash NOT expected but found" messages
to be marked a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 518812 moreinfo
Bug #518812 [linux-2.6] I/O errors with 3w- and 8Gb ram
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 519749 moreinfo
Bug #519749 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26: with snd-au8820 after some time
recording i get the error: [ 332.644437] Vortex: vortex_fifo_setadbctrl fail
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 519166 moreinfo
Bug #519166 [linux-2.6] [linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64] ACPI: EC: missing
confirmations, switch off interrupt mode.
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 568725 linux-2.6
Bug #568725 [wireshark] wireshark: crashes machine right after starting capture
Bug reassigned from package 'wireshark' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions wireshark/1.2.5-1.
> affects 570279 wiresha
>
> You are correct, this badness is fixed with 2.6.32-8. The double resume is
> still a problem though, but I don't know how to debug this. Any pointers?
the double resume happened a lot on gnome desktops afaik.
this points to gnome-power-manager or such, are you running latest
2.6.28.3-2 ??
announcing upload for tomorrow after lunch UT
outstanding issues:
* review of r8169 patch by Ben
amicalement max
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20
maximilian,
am Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 05:42:28PM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> the double resume happened a lot on gnome desktops afaik.
> this points to gnome-power-manager or such, are you running latest
> 2.6.28.3-2 ??
I do.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:23:51 +0100
with message-id <20100223152351.ga12...@kelgar.0x539.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#571096: Badness after waking up on iBook G4
has caused the Debian Bug report #571096,
regarding Badness after waking up on iBook G4
to be marked as done.
This means
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:39:33PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-powerpc
>
> I get the following badness after wakeing up on iBook G4. Furthermore,
> after upgrading from 2.6.30 (where suspending worked perfectly) it wakes
> up once after suspend, then suspends im
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:53:01 -0300
with message-id <20100223145301.ga4...@mail.madap.com.ar>
and subject line RE: [linux-2.6] Broken support on root Luks encrypted volume
has caused the Debian Bug report #561098,
regarding [linux-2.6] Broken support on root Luks encrypted volume
to
Jaunā izsoles veikala atklāšana jau 18. februārī! Reģistrējies
www.ebid.lv un saņem dāvanā divas likmes bez maksas! Iepazīsties ar izsoles
precēm jau tagad un izmēģini veiksmi – varbūt esi vienīgais solītājs! Ja
izsoles laikā neatrodies pie datora, lieliska iespēja
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:07:44PM +0100, Jan Dittberner wrote:
>
> ~> uname -a; LC_ALL=C dpkg -l linux-image-2.6.32-2-amd64
> linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
> Linux pneumantius 2.6.32-2-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Feb 12 00:01:47 UTC 2010 x86_64
> GNU/Linux
> ...
> ||/ Name V
reassign 544709 hotkey-setup
severity 544709 serious
stop
[ adding cc's in case this needs discussions. ]
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:02:10AM -0600, Josue Abarca wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:34:01AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Josue Abarca wrote:
> >
> > > On S
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 544709 hotkey-setup
Bug #544709 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: /proc/acpi/button/lid/*/state
always says "open"
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'hotkey-setup'.
> severity 544709 serious
Bug #544709 [hotkey-setup] linux-
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:34:01AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Josue Abarca wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:41:17PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > can you reproduce with 2.6.32 ?
> >
> > Yes, I can.
> >
> > Using linux-image-2.6.32-2-686 2.6.32-8
> > :(
Here is my solution to this problem, lenny xen kernel:
* dom0 with clocksource=jiffies and /proc/sys/xen/independent_wallclock=0
* domU with clocksource=jiffies and /proc/sys/xen/independent_wallclock=0
* ntpdate/ntp only in dom0, NOT in the domUs
I tested it the following way:
While changing the
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:04:51PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:30:20PM +0100, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
> > Version: 2.6.32+24
> > Severity: normal
>
> uff you seem to confuse versions, sid has currently 2.6.32-8 as seen on
> dpkg -l
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-powerpc
I get the following badness after wakeing up on iBook G4. Furthermore,
after upgrading from 2.6.30 (where suspending worked perfectly) it wakes
up once after suspend, then suspends immediately again and the second
wake up works properly. The badness is p
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:30:20PM +0100, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
> Version: 2.6.32+24
> Severity: normal
uff you seem to confuse versions, sid has currently 2.6.32-8 as seen on
dpkg -l linux-image-2.6.32-2-amd64
> The Linux kernel on my AMD64 WLAN-AP/gateway machi
reassign 571085 linux-2.6
tags 571085 moreinfo
stop
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:03:57PM +0100, robi wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-2-686
> hello,
> I have upgraded kernel to 2.6.32-2-686 from 2.6.26-2-686.
> After that, when I boot my laptop (debian lenny) I get the error about no
> write a
Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
Version: 2.6.32+24
Severity: normal
The Linux kernel on my AMD64 WLAN-AP/gateway machine spits the following
warning to the syslog from time to time:
Feb 23 11:46:12 pneumantius kernel: [ 3008.768447] [ cut here
]
Feb 23 11:46:12 pneumantius
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-2-686
hello,
I have upgraded kernel to 2.6.32-2-686 from 2.6.26-2-686.
After that, when I boot my laptop (debian lenny) I get the error about no write
access to /home.
It's mounted with rw options and it's encrypted from /dev/mapper/dat-home.
After rebooting the system
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> Ooops... just seconds after my mail the server panic'd while xfsdumping
> to tape:
>
> Kernel panic - not syncing: xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim
> 0x8800642fcd80
>
> Pid: 47, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.32-2-amd
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:36:43 +0100
with message-id <20100223103643.gc15...@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#525073: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#525073:
network-manager: umts dialin: Total system crash
has caused the Debian Bug report #525073,
regarding network-manager: u
Hi all,
Am 23.02.2010 11:35, schrieb maximilian attems:
xfsdump version is not specified. Stefan could you add that info?
output of:
dpkg -l xfsdump
Here we go...
# dpkg -l xfsdump
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait
On 20/02/10 12:47, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
tags 535278 moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 12:04:16PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
Christophe Mutricy wrote:
For me it also looks like a kernel bug. the vlc log looks completly
normal and i can't see any vlc functions in the backt
Hi,
> Both filesystems and LVM have UUIDs. Does dm-crypt / LUKS have one too?
LUKS, of course, has UUID, plain dm-crypt of course not... :-)
bye,
--
piergiorgio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
Am 20.02.2010 10:35, schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:49:06AM +0200, Thomas Renard wrote:
>> I tried it with an 2.6.26-2-686. Here the crash is not as hard as with
>> the 2.6.29...
>>
>> So, here is a backtrace (attachment)
>
> Hi,
> The next release of Debian (6.0, code na
also sprach Goswin von Brederlow [2010.02.23.0831 +0100]:
> Both filesystems and LVM have UUIDs. Does dm-crypt / LUKS have one
> too?
LVM already identifies PVs using UUIDs, so if you are using
anything-on-LVM-on-md, you need not worry about device names anyway.
dm-crypt currently needs to be to
also sprach Goswin von Brederlow [2010.02.23.0829 +0100]:
> Or virtualization with raid in the virtual hosts. The host system will
> see all the raids of the virtual systems but none of them should be
> started.
I'd say there are better ways to set this up, but this is a fair
point.
--
martin |
63 matches
Mail list logo
