Ben Hutchings wrote:
> There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
> early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes.
> Therefore I propose to upload with the changes from 2.6.32.6 once that's
> released.
>
> (Still no stable ABI, sorry.)
If the ABI chan
Anders Boström wrote:
> Cc: b...@decadent.org.uk; net...@vger.kernel.org;
> 565...@bugs.debian.org; Xiong Huang
> Subject: Re: Bug#565404: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: atl1e:
> TSO is broken
> One strange observation is that I can only reproduce this
> problem when transmitting data from a NFS-se
There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
early this week. As usual, these include some security fixes.
Therefore I propose to upload with the changes from 2.6.32.6 once that's
released.
(Still no stable ABI, sorry.)
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly functioning
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 00:27:48 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > What about my suggestion of removing the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> > declarations from fb modules, so they do not appear in modules.pcimap
> > etc? Did you see any problem with that?
> >
> Dropping those and u
ii debconf 1.5.28
Debian configuration management system
ii debconf-i18n 1.5.28
full internationalization support for debcon
Configured to use dialog
ii dialog
1.1-20
Hi,
I have similar problems with my laptop and
I read the bug report logs and I still can't find
iwlwifi-6050-4.ucode
needed by iwlagn driver. This is forcing me to use
an older kernel where that driver still works. )-;
I've had this problem since 2.6.31. Also, why do
2.6.31 and 2.6.32 kernels
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 00:27:48 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> What about my suggestion of removing the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> declarations from fb modules, so they do not appear in modules.pcimap
> etc? Did you see any problem with that?
>
Dropping those and udev's blacklist would be fine as far
In linux.debian.kernel maximilian attems wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> lack of the equivalent of "vzctl enter" is a critical issue for my
>> applications.
>looks feasable thanks to libvirt:
>virsh --connect lxc:/// console v1
>http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.h
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 00:56 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:34:45 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> > On Jan 12, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> > > Marco, what do you think of switching to this, or at least using its fb
> > > part?
> > I do not mind explicitly blacklisting ea
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 24, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
> > if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
> > looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, th
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> lack of the equivalent of "vzctl enter" is a critical issue for my
> applications.
looks feasable thanks to libvirt:
virsh --connect lxc:/// console v1
http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ..
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:34:45 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 12, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > Marco, what do you think of switching to this, or at least using its fb
> > part?
> I do not mind explicitly blacklisting each fb driver, but I would like
> to have a way to semi-automatically ge
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-5
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm also hit by this issue. I've attached some info in hope it helps
solving this one.
- -- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-5) (b...@decadent.org
After thrid line (pathing using debian script)
chmod +x debian/bin/gencontrol.py
debian/bin/gencontrol.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "debian/bin/gencontrol.py", line 331, in
Gencontrol()()
File "debian/bin/gencontrol.py", line 14, in __init__
self.process_changelog()
Fi
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 05:08:55PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 17 January 2010, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> > Now that http://bugs.debian.org/562594 is fixed, I was able to
> > continue the installation and it all went fine until the end.
> > However, after finishing the in
In linux.debian.kernel Suno Ano wrote:
> Marco> So it will not actually be available in squeeze, and squeeze
> Marco> cannot work with the lenny kernels unless they are rebuilt with
> Marco> CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=n. You could as well have said proposed
> Marco> to wait and use the RHEL6 kernels
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 566726 moreinfo
Bug #566726 [linux-source-2.6.32] linux-source-2.6.32: compile fails with
"multiple definition of `ieee80211_ " errors
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 20:32 +, John Talbut wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.32
> Version: 2.6.32-5
> Severity: important
>
> When I tried to compile a kernel it failed with the following messages:
>
> AR arch/x86/lib/lib.a
> LD vmlinux.o
> net/built-in.o: In function `ieee8021
Package: linux-source-2.6.32
Version: 2.6.32-5
Severity: important
When I tried to compile a kernel it failed with the following messages:
AR arch/x86/lib/lib.a
LD vmlinux.o
net/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_wake_queue':
(.text+0xbb5ed): multiple definition of `ieee80211_wake_q
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-5
Severity: wishlist
Support for memory cgroups controllers are not included in the new
2.6.32 kernel. This would be nice say for putting limits on a how much
memory a group of VMs can use.
I believe the following two options need to be ena
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 15:17 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 24, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
> > if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
> > looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is
>> - Those environments in need for limits/beancounters (disk quota
>> etc.) May probably have to wait another six months or so until it
>> will be available in LXC. Till then it is quite possible to run on
>> 2.6.26 with OpenVZ and then migrate things to LXC.
Marco> So it will not actu
In linux.debian.kernel Suno Ano wrote:
> - most folks run Linux-VServer, OpenVZ, LXC etc. on boxes they own plus
> they control themselves so that is not really an issue
I wonder how you came to this conclusion.
> - those environments in need for limits/beancounters (disk quota etc.)
> may p
Bastian> Please describe the _kernel_ improvements over the normal
Bastian> images. Most of it is already enabled in the default images
Bastian> and does not warrant for an extra image.
As you can see from http://sunoano.pastebin.com/m4b5380dc , line 29,
Cgroup memory controller is not. This se
elect ion exact grand mothe r missh apenl y prior itizi ng
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 06:06:52 +0100, tom schorpp wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-2
> Severity: normal
>
> At least tvtime works in indirect mode only, high CPU.
>
> Does not look like missing Firmware, no FW err messages in dmesg or syslog:
>
> --- /var/log/Xorg.0.log 200
kraft exasp erati ng renew able
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
infun dibul ar aceto nic hollo a
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:37:26PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> I thus propose to enable an lxc (linux containers) [1] flavour:
Please describe the _kernel_ improvements over the normal images. Most
of it is already enabled in the default images and does not warrant for
an extra image.
> * l
ordin and motor way
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Jan 24, maximilian attems wrote:
> the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
> if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
> looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is
> no sign of a patch for 2.6.32, nor any schedule like it happene
hello,
the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is
no sign of a patch for 2.6.32, nor any schedule like it happened
to be for Lenny).
I thus propose to
Hello,
I think you still do not understand what the user who reports bug
against your packages receives. Here is an example, this is the only
mail which I get when you close a bug.
READ IT:
* Debian Bug Tracking System [Sat, Jan 23 2010, 11:36:09PM]:
> This is an automatic notification regarding
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 562085 2.6.31-3
Bug #562085 [linux-2.6] v4l2: tv video device drops frames
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.31-3' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.31-3'
Bug Marked as f
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 18:58 +0100, Carl-M. Hoefer wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-5
> Severity: important
>
> I i try to wake the computer up from standy, i just get a black screen.
> No keyboard inputs have any affect.
> Ping from other computers get an timeout.
>
> I looked at /va
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 564010 initramfs-tools 0.93.4
Bug #564010 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: fails to boot
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'initramfs-tools'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.32-3.
Bug #564010 [initramfs-too
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 566547 patch
Bug #566547 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: Segmentation fault
during halt
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 566626 virtualbox-ose
Bug #566626 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: updating a kernel
should start re-building DKMS modules
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'virtualbox-ose'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions
Forwarded Message
From: Andrew Morton
To: Greg KH
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org, sta...@kernel.org, Xiaotian Feng
, Thomas Gleixner ,
torva...@linux-foundation.org, stable-rev...@kernel.org,
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Stable-review] [stable] [00/29] 2.6.32.6 st
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 10:37 +0100, Wolfgang Schnitker wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-5
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello, I am using virtualbox-ose on my machine, therefore I have to
> build the vbox module every time, a kernel update comes up.
>
> Because DKMS is early loaded at system
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 566547 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15117
Bug #566547 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: Segmentation fault
during halt
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15117'.
> thanks
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-5
Severity: normal
Hello, I am using virtualbox-ose on my machine, therefore I have to build the
vbox module every time, a kernel update comes up.
Because DKMS is early loaded at system startup and after update no Module is
present, booting slowes down until m
42 matches
Mail list logo
