Your message dated Sun, 10 Jan 2010 01:58:25 +
with message-id <1263088705.2480.211.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#561087: linux-image-2.6.32-rc8-amd64: rt61pci internet
is slow with the 2.6.32-rc8 kernel
has caused the Debian Bug report #561087,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-rc8-amd
Am Sonntag 10 Januar 2010 02:08:05 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 11:06 +0100, Carl wrote:
> [...]
>
> > What can i do to isolate this bug?
> >
> > I will try to find an other wifi, and see if it's working better else
> > were. Also i can try to compile the .32 from the kernel.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 561087 moreinfo
Bug #561087 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-rc8-amd64: rt61pci internet is slow
with the 2.6.32-rc8 kernel
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian b
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 11:06 +0100, Carl wrote:
[...]
> What can i do to isolate this bug?
>
> I will try to find an other wifi, and see if it's working better else were.
> Also
> i can try to compile the .32 from the kernel.org source and check if that
> works better.
>
> Anything else i could
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 03:19 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 18:35 +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.32-3
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > If I rmmod and modprobe ath5k and then bring the link up, the
> > machine repeatably hard-locks. I have no i
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:55:58 +
with message-id <1263084958.2480.160.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6-686: introduce a
linux-image-VERSION-desktop flavor
has caused the Debian Bug report #512933,
regarding linux-image-2.6-686: introduce a linux-image-VERSION
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 558721 2.6.32-3
Bug#558721: Please update sfc driver from 2.6.33/net-next-2.6
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.6.32-3, send any further explanations to Ben
Hutchings
retitle 559619 /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools should ignore missing
initrd.img
tags 559619 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Marc Haber wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.93.4
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools exists with an error if
> update-initramfs -d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 559619 /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools should ignore missing
> initrd.img
Bug #559619 [initramfs-tools] /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools should
ignore errors from update-initramfs -d
Changed Bug title to '/etc/kernel/postrm.d/in
Quoting maximilian attems :
[ please keep bug report on cc, thanks ]
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 03:03:01PM -0800, Willy Gommel wrote:
actually, no. Part of the reason is that I didn't know that 2.6.32 was
available; another part of the reason is that, even knowing that it is
available, I don't k
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 564476 linux-2.6
Bug #564476 [udev] udev: Memory leak
Bug reassigned from package 'udev' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions udev/149-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
reassign 564476 linux-2.6
thanks
On Jan 09, David Liontooth wrote:
> WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c:129 idr_callback+0x36/0x58()
> Hardware name: X8DT3
> inotify closing but id=0 for entry=8801bd9143c8 in group=8801bf08c380
> still in idr. Probably leaking memory
Wha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 513088 linux-2.6
Bug #513088 [git-core] git-core: git-push corrupts repository on hfsplus file
system
Bug reassigned from package 'git-core' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions git-core/1:1.5.6.5-2.
> thanks
Stoppin
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 01:45:27AM -0500, Dale Harris wrote:
> Package: firmware-linux-nonfree
> Version: 0.22
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Whatever the reason, acceleration is not working in X11. And what I see in
> my dmesg is this:
>
> [ 79.522449] [drm] Initialized radeon 1.30.0 20080528 for
reassign 513088 linux-2.6
thanks
Hi Garcia,
Garcia Juan wrote:
> Package: git-core
> Version: 1:1.5.6.5-2
> Severity: important
>
>
> I'd like to have a bare repository on an ipod (hfsplus formatted) for back-up
> purposes.
> After creation of repository, cloning (on a different machine to avo
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:00:35PM +, Julien Cristau wrote:
> found 550977 2.6.30-8
Also persisted in 2.6.32-rc8. I haven't tried anything past that.
> tag 560126 - unreproducible
Actually, I was able reproduce it fairly reliably on this machine
(which is of limited help to
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 00:07:40 +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:00:35PM +, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> > Looks like we have a pretty nasty bug in radeon drm…
> >
> > I chatted a bit with Dave Airlie on irc:
>
> Which channel is that? :)
>
free
Hi Julien,
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:00:35PM +, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> Looks like we have a pretty nasty bug in radeon drm…
>
> I chatted a bit with Dave Airlie on irc:
Which channel is that? :)
> 22:36 < jcristau> does anybody know what's up with
> http://bugzilla.k
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 550977 2.6.26-19lenny2
Bug #550977 [linux-2.6] radeon DRI driver corrupts memory
Bug #559037 [linux-2.6] radeon DRI driver corrupts memory
Bug #560126 [linux-2.6] xserver-xorg-video-radeon: Launching GL Apps Corrupts
System
There is no s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 560126 linux-2.6 2.6.32~rc8-1~experimental.1
Bug #560126 [xserver-xorg-video-radeon] xserver-xorg-video-radeon: Launching GL
Apps Corrupts System
Bug reassigned from package 'xserver-xorg-video-radeon' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marke
reassign 560126 linux-2.6 2.6.32~rc8-1~experimental.1
found 550977 2.6.30-8
tag 560126 - unreproducible
merge 550977 560126
affects 550977 xserver-xorg-video-radeon
forwarded 550977 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14535
kthxbye
Looks like we have a pretty nasty bug in radeon drm…
I cha
#include
* Eduard Bloch [Sat, Jan 09 2010, 09:23:55PM]:
> severity 559619 important
> thanks
>
> I think this bug has also hit me now. There is some dormant initrd file
> which I don't care about (most likely left behind due to kernel-package
> bugs, doesn't matter now). And now the upgrade of in
severity 559619 important
thanks
I think this bug has also hit me now. There is some dormant initrd file
which I don't care about (most likely left behind due to kernel-package
bugs, doesn't matter now). And now the upgrade of initramfs-tools for
now good reason:
Setting up initramfs-tools (0.93.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 559619 important
Bug #559619 [initramfs-tools] /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools should
ignore errors from update-initramfs -d
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Package: firmware-linux-nonfree
Severity: normal
Okay, false alarm from me going to linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686 fixed my
problems.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (
Emanuele Aina wrote:
> I have the same problem reported by Ludovico and, as noted in the
> upstream bug report already pointed out by Reinhard [1], reducing the
> amount of ram from 4G to something smaller (e.g. 3.5G) with the
> mem=3500M kernel boot parameter causes the bug to disappear and can be
Package: firmware-linux-nonfree
Version: 0.22
Severity: normal
Whatever the reason, acceleration is not working in X11. And what I see in
my dmesg is this:
[ 79.522449] [drm] Initialized radeon 1.30.0 20080528 for :01:00.0 on
minor 0
[ 79.785056] platform r600_cp.0: firmware: requesti
27 matches
Mail list logo
