On 08/12/09 at 00:30 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:04:58AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
> > Version: 2.6.25-6
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > My Dell laptop, a Latitude D610, no longer resumes with kernel 2.6.25.
>
We saw the same thing here after restarting the nfs-kernel-server. Only
happened once over multiple attempts.
Also, google found this:
http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/nfsv4/2009-March/009994.html
roland:~# uname -a
Linux roland 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 5 02:23:12 UTC 2009 x86_64
GNU/Lin
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:08:56AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:45:09PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Mon, 09 Mar 2009, pawel wrote:
> >
> > > Package: kernel
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > system don't recognize more than 895MB of system memory (phys
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 08:26:42PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:57:36AM +0300, Vladimir Zamiussky wrote:
> > Package: base
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > I don't exactly know wether this bug related to base system or to linux
> > kernel or
> > cpufreq subsystem
> >
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:58:39PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:01:39PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:01:55PM -0300, Ronaldo Reis Junior wrote:
> > > > could you check latest 2.6.28 sid snapshots or 2.6.29-rc7 builds
> > > > and see
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 06:31:41PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.30-6
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> apparently my CD-ROM is slightly defective and does not give the
> expected answers to the kernel. The harddisk on the same bus works fine,
> so it is not an elec
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 12:17:04PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 20:45 +1100, root wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.31-1~experimental.1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > I have had a few crashes with the following described in the syslog. The
> > exact appearance of
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:04:58AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
> Version: 2.6.25-6
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> My Dell laptop, a Latitude D610, no longer resumes with kernel 2.6.25.
>
> During resume, there's some hard disk activity, but the screen neve
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 01:47:33PM +0200, Gerrit Jan Baarda wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 October 2009 22:11:45 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 05:06:12PM +0200, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
> > > Version: 2.6.26-4
> > > Severity: important
>
> >
>
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 12:16:59AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 10:53:52PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > I intend to disable cryptoloop support for Squeeze.
>
> Are you adding this to the release notes?
Yes, it's on my TODO list.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To U
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 10:53:52PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> I intend to disable cryptoloop support for Squeeze.
Are you adding this to the release notes?
Bastian
--
Fascinating, a totally parochial attitude.
-- Spock, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3219.8
--
To UNSUBSCR
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 559755 + pending
Bug #559755 [linux-2.6] Disable cryptoloop
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Hi,
here is related bug-report and patch:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14604
please try it and say, if it work.
Regards,
Andrej Gelenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
Your message dated Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:50:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#444043: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #444043,
regarding network-manager: Unconnected USB ethernet device is made to take
priority over connected wireless!
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:50:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#558011: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #558011,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-rc8-amd64: Missing ath5k driver
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:50:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#558426: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #558426,
regarding atl1e performance problems with native IPv6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:50:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#555640: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #555640,
regarding linux-image-2.6.31-1-amd64: wifi network does not start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:50:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#558011: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #558011,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-rc8-amd64: several missing modules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:50:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#504391: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #504391,
regarding Make CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME a run-time option
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
This patch fixes the problem for me.
- Forwarded message from jie.y...@atheros -
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:16:58 +0800
From: jie.y...@atheros
To: da...@davemloft
CC: cma...@profis.ro, net...@vger.kernel, linux-ker...@vger.kernel,
Jie Yang
Subject: [PATCH net-next]atl1c:use common
> [...]
> I've built the module from the sources for the next stable kernel package,
> including this patch. So try using this:
> http://womble.decadent.org.uk/tmp/atl1e.ko
>
OK, thanks a lot.
Now I'm using this module.
Unfortunately this module runs not perfect yet.
At first I thought it's O
21 matches
Mail list logo