Hi,
On Sat, 24.10.2009 at 01:38:30 +0100, Ben Hutchings
wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 19:27 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > $ grep track /etc/sysctl.conf
> > net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 485760
> >
> > $ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_max
> > 32768
> Perhaps some other
Version: 2.6.28-1
This appears to have gone upstream in 2.6.27, so its first appearance
in debian would've been 2.6.28-1 (we skipped 2.6.27).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 522922 lenny
Bug #522922 [linux-2.6] igb: missing support for Intel 82576
Added tag(s) lenny.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Your message dated Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:55:52 -0600
with message-id <20091024005552.gb27...@lackof.org>
and subject line fixed in sid/squeeze
has caused the Debian Bug report #522922,
regarding igb: missing support for Intel 82576
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # new hardware support
> severity 522922 important
Bug #522922 [linux-2.6] igb: missing support for Intel 82576
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 19:27 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to add: Despite my having this:
>
> $ grep track /etc/sysctl.conf
> net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 485760
>
>
> I found this after reboot:
>
> $ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_max
> 32768
[.
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 11:24 -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 05:08:15PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > you still didn't read or get my question:
> > Who will maintain the chosen pvops patch for the Squeeze lifetime?
> >
> > yes, this is the part of the work:
> > * backwa
Hi,
I just wanted to add: Despite my having this:
$ grep track /etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 485760
I found this after reboot:
$ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_max
32768
I had to manually set the value:
# sysctl -w net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_ma
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 538159 + pending
Bug #538159 {Done: maximilian attems } [linux-2.6]
CONFIG_X86_PAT=y breaks bogl-bterm, d-i
Bug #538782 {Done: maximilian attems } [linux-2.6] Hang
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 541307 + pending
Bug #541307 {Done: maximilian attems } [linux-2.6] agp/intel:
gpu lockups on 865G
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 522358 + pending
Bug #522358 {Done: maximilian attems } [linux-2.6]
xserver-xorg-video-intel: [945GM + KMS] Misdetection of TV output
Bug #533550 {Done: maximilian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 525958 + pending
Bug #525958 {Done: maximilian attems } [linux-2.6] Disable
CONFIG_PROM_CONSOLE on sparc
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 515982 + pending
Bug #515982 {Done: maximilian attems } [linux-2.6]
linux-image-2.6-486: Cannot boot on i486
Bug #511703 {Done: maximilian attems } [linux-2.6] Kern
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 507557 + pending
Bug #507557 {Done: maximilian attems }
[linux-image-2.6.26-1-r4k-ip22] linux-image-2.6.26-1-r4k-ip22: hangs early at
boot on Indigo2
Ignoring requ
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:04:37PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> any objections against uploading 2.6.31 to unstable tomorrow?
fyi, ia64 is working fine (though there are no builds appearing in
experimental for whatever reason)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-req
Hello Ben,
on 2.6.30-2-powerpc
# ls -l /sys/class/power_supply
ls: cannot access /sys/class/power_supply: No such file or directory
I also installed image-linux package for lenny, so on 2.6.26-2-powerpc
# ls -l /sys/class/power_supply
ls: cannot access /sys/class/power_supply: No such file or
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:06:03AM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:43:31PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > If this is the case, and if we assume that pv-ops xen support is
> > > eventually included upstream (which certainly appears to be the goal),
> > > why the depr
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 05:08:15PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> you still didn't read or get my question:
> Who will maintain the chosen pvops patch for the Squeeze lifetime?
>
> yes, this is the part of the work:
> * backward port important fixes, securtiy patches
> * read bug reports, decip
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:43:31PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > If this is the case, and if we assume that pv-ops xen support is
> > eventually included upstream (which certainly appears to be the goal),
> > why the deprecation notice?
>
> who stepped to properly maintain the patch in the c
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:06:55AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > xen dom 0
> > > > +
> > Are you basing your patch on the PV-ops tree or on one of the SuSE
> > forward ports? Based on your recent posts to xen-devel I had assumed the
> > former but Ben's initial post suggested perhaps
any objections against uploading 2.6.31 to unstable tomorrow?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
severity 552088 normal
stop
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:30:26AM +0200, Dennis Leeuw wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-686
> Version: 2.6.26+17+lenny1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
not even remotely.
> I have a:
> [ 256.620087] ath5k phy1: Atheros AR5213A chip found
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 552088 normal
Bug #552088 [linux-image-2.6-686] linux-image-2.6-686: ath5k phy1: noise floor
calibration timeout
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian b
severity 552084 normal
stop
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 05:20:00AM -0400, daniel wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
>
> Version: 0.93.4
>
> Severity: critical
stop it, please reread the severity description.
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> with btrfs the generated scripts f
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 01:15:52PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:54:21AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've experienced the same problem. I've got two lenny machines which have
> > GPT paritition tables and Linux root on LVM, and they can't use anything b
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:54:21AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've experienced the same problem. I've got two lenny machines which have
> GPT paritition tables and Linux root on LVM, and they can't use anything but
> LILO (there are some novelty hacks for GRUB but I haven't been able to t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 552084 normal
Bug #552084 [initramfs-tools] [initramfs-tools] generated scripts break with
btrfs
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 552084 to the same value.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
maximilian attems ha scritto:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:45:08AM +0200, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
I've applied latest forward ported patches from
http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list
to the 2.6.31 experimental package.
The resulting kernel works well for me (at least on amd6
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:45:08AM +0200, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> I've applied latest forward ported patches from
>
> http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list
>
> to the 2.6.31 experimental package.
> The resulting kernel works well for me (at least on amd64 arch).
>
> Fell fr
Hi,
I've experienced the same problem. I've got two lenny machines which have
GPT paritition tables and Linux root on LVM, and they can't use anything but
LILO (there are some novelty hacks for GRUB but I haven't been able to test
them yet because this is in production). I have kernel-img.conf set
Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 2.6.26+17+lenny1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have a:
[ 256.620087] ath5k phy1: Atheros AR5213A chip found (MAC: 0x59, PHY:
0x43)
[ 256.620091] ath5k phy1: RF5112A multiband radio found (0x36)
The module ath5k when inserted dur
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.4
Severity: critical
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
with btrfs the generated scripts for finding and mounting root are not
working for me.
My setup is luks > lvm2 > btrfs.
More specifically the way of the scripts to find out the files
I've applied latest forward ported patches from
http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list
to the 2.6.31 experimental package.
The resulting kernel works well for me (at least on amd64 arch).
Fell free to reuse my little work
http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia/xen/oldschool-xen-2
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 11:06 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:45 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > > > xen dom 0
> > > > +
> > Are you
maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:10:18AM +0200, Adam wrote:
> >
> > However the real and remaining problem is a initramfs for 2.6.30-2 that
> > doesn't boot (wasn't stated properly in my previous email). The old
> > initramfs for -2 (initrd.img-2.6.30-2-powerpc.bak) boots as
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:45 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > > xen dom 0
> > > +
> Are you basing your patch on the PV-ops tree or on one of the SuSE
> forwar
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:45 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > xen dom 0
> > +
> > Upstream development is splintered but Bastian Blank is willing to
> > implement the patch for squeeze. Final decision on inclusion subject
> >
37 matches
Mail list logo
