Hi
I believe this bug can be closed now. I posted the question on
linux-kernel mailing list. A reply came back about mtu issues.
Seems like I had 2 problems
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 409687380 2097152
in my sysctl.conf, a hang over from long ago
and my mtu was set wrongly the route informati
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> H> Do I understand correctly, and now that you're using brightness_mode=2, you
> H> see no weird brightness changes when you lauch xdm, and your brightness
> keys
> H> work just fine?
> Yes, and yes.
>
> (I am still observing how well brightness set
H> Do I understand correctly, and now that you're using brightness_mode=2, you
H> see no weird brightness changes when you lauch xdm, and your brightness keys
H> work just fine?
Yes, and yes.
(I am still observing how well brightness settings last through boots.
I will mail back if they don't.)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
> found 485465 2.6.24-1
Bug#485465: thinkpad-acpi: races on brightness change on a R50e
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.24-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
> found 485465 2.6.14-1
Bug#485465: thinkpad-acpi: races on brightness change on a R50e
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.14-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.25-6
Hi,
with the migration of kernel 2.6.25-6 from unstable to testing this
error is spreading to many machines.
Because this error and it's patch are known since may, this migration to
testing should have been avoided, for my understanding.
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92e
Severity: minor
When upgrading recently I noticed initramfs-tools give the following warning:
Warning: Busybox is required for successful boot!
... but it isn't. I shut down, and rebooted perfectly successfully.
This happened on two different machines
reopen 479607
thanks
annonygmouse wrote:
Hi folks I've seen bug 479607 has been closed with lilo version 22.8-5
but I still can't boot my machine with 2.6.25-2...
debianmbp:~# LANG=C aptitude show lilo
Package: lilo
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 1:22.8-5
Priority: op
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
> severity 485465 normal
Bug#485465: thinkpad-acpi: races on brightness change on a R50e
Severity set to `normal' from `minor'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
> owner 485465 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#485465: thinkpad-acpi: races on brightness change on a R50e
Owner recorded as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 485465 linux-2.6
Bug#485465: need a way to remember brightness or store brightness in xorg.conf
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-core' to `linux-2.6'.
> retitle 485465 thinkpad-acpi: races on brightness change on a R50e
Bug#485465: ne
I'm not certain that it's the same bug, but it's similar, so I'm
replying to the existing bug.
After upgrading to linux-image-2.6.25-2-686, I got a system hang
shortly after boot. It might have taken longer the second time, the
difference being that I spent a few minutes in console before logging
Kernel commandline parameter i8042.noloop is the trick.
1.) I appreciate Guillaume Morin's help.
2). But now, is this a linux (kernel, i8042, ???) bug or a hardware bug? Seems
noone from bugs.debian.org cares...
Markus
--
GMX Kostenlose Spiele: Einfach online spielen und Spaß haben mit Pastry
Hi folks I've seen bug 479607 has been closed with lilo version 22.8-5
but I still can't boot my machine with 2.6.25-2...
debianmbp:~# LANG=C aptitude show lilo
Package: lilo
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 1:22.8-5
Priority: optional
Section: admin
Maintainer: William P
maximilian attems wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 01:56:34PM -0400, Jeff Green wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-powerpc
Version: 2.6.25-6
... snip ...
can you please try out 2.6.26-rc9 it has pci fixes,
see trunk apt lines
-> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
No cigar, I got
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.25-7.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.25-7.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.25-7.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.25-7.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.25_2.6.25-7_all.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.25_2.6.25-7_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6.25-2-all-amd64_2.6.25
linux-2.6_2.6.25-7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.25-7.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.25-7.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.25_2.6.25-7_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.25_2.6.25-7_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.25_2.6.25-7_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.25_2.6.25-7_all.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:56:33PM +0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-14 11:14]:
> > > No I don't believe so. Do you want me to submit patches?
> > >
> > > Christian says he normally just commits to sid. Would you prefer
> > > that I commit to trunk (
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
> forwarded 425250 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11084
Bug#425250: linux-source-2.6.18 : "make pdfdocs" in the linux-source-2.6.18
fails.
Noted your statement that Bug ha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 490285 linux-2.6
Bug#490285: [nfs-common] kernel oops when mounting
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.24'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.24' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-vserver-686
Version: 2.6.25-6
Severity: normal
Hello,
The package(s) *-modules-2.6-vserver-686 depend on
linux-latest-modules-2.6.25-2-vserver-686 which is usually provided
by a package like linux-image-2.6-vserver-686.
However, there is no such (pseudo)-package so t
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:26:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64: No sound after suspend-to-ram an
wake-up
has caused the Debian Bug report #480034,
regarding linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64: No sound after suspend-to-ram an wake-up
(s
* maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-14 11:14]:
> > No I don't believe so. Do you want me to submit patches?
> >
> > Christian says he normally just commits to sid. Would you prefer
> > that I commit to trunk (or send patches based on trunk)?
>
> yes 2.6.26 is not yet in sid branch, s
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 09:26:30PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:27:12AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >
> > > Howdy!
> > >
> > > Christian is going on travel so I'm hoping to add some m68k patches so
> > > we c
24 matches
Mail list logo
