Mapping testing to testing-proposed-updates.
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all-ia64_2.6.24-7_ia64.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all-ia64_2.6.24-7_ia64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all_2.6.24-7_ia64.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all_2.6.24-7_ia64.deb
Mapping testing to testing-proposed-updates.
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all-hppa_2.6.24-7_hppa.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all-hppa_2.6.24-7_hppa.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all_2.6.24-7_hppa.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all_2.6.24-7_hppa.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.24-7_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-image-2.6.24-1-parisc_2.6.24-7_hppa.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-parisc_2.6.24-7_hppa.deb
linux-image-2.6.24-1-parisc-smp_2.6.24-7_hppa.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-parisc-smp_2.6.24-7_hppa.deb
linu
linux-2.6_2.6.24-7_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-image-2.6.24-1-itanium_2.6.24-7_ia64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-itanium_2.6.24-7_ia64.deb
linux-image-2.6.24-1-mckinley_2.6.24-7_ia64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-mckinley_2.6.24-7_ia64.deb
linux-
Your message dated Sat, 10 May 2008 18:59:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Work with 2.6.25
has caused the Debian Bug report #478749,
regarding linux-image-2.6-686: hwclock fails to /dev/rtc timeout on 2.6.24
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 07:11:02AM +0800, aLexandre M wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
> Version: 2.6.24-6
> Severity: important
>
> Look like a bug of the Kernel!
> When i boot i've got this message :
> PCI: BIOS Bug: MCFG area at e000 is not E820-reserved
please try 2.6.25 linux i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26
> forwarded 480034 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10662
Bug#480034: linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64: No sound after suspend-to-ram an
wake-up (snd_hda_intel)
Noted your stateme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jaroslav Kysela!
Some folks and I have some concerns about something found in CS46xx
Cirrus Logic firmware[1].
Unfortunately it does not provide a license with it, which, as our
understandings[2], it makes it undistributable.
Do you think It will
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-6
Severity: important
Look like a bug of the Kernel!
When i boot i've got this message :
PCI: BIOS Bug: MCFG area at e000 is not E820-reserved
That the result of dmesg | grep BIOS :
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
BIOS-e820:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 462035 linux-2.6
Bug#462035: linux-image-2.6.23-1-686: snd_cs46xx missing
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.23-1-686'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.23-1-686' to `linux-2.6'.
> reassign 477409 linux-2.6
Bug#477409: linux-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 468151 linux-2.6 2.6.24-1
Bug#468151: Files missing for SND_CS46XX module
Bug reassigned from package `linux-source-2.6.24' to `linux-2.6'.
> forcemerge 464197 455092 468151
Bug#464197: snd-cs46xx.ko module seems to be missing from
linux-imag
I have filed bug #10662:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10662
Arnaud: I couldn't find which application was blocking snd_hda_intel so
I didn't add that information to the bug report. If you can, please
comment on the upstream bug.
--
"Jesus died to take our wibbles away, so now we c
This one time, at band camp, maximilian attems said:
> On Fri, 09 May 2008, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> > This one time, at band camp, maximilian attems said:
> > > how is 2.6.25 in sid doing?
> >
> > Slightly better, but it still drops the connection 3 times during
> > apt-get source linux-2.6
> >
I installed the 2.6.25 Kernel from sid, and yes the problem is solved.
It just behaves like it did on 2.6.22 .
I assume it is related to HPET.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 02 May 2008, Jozef Kutej wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-xen-686
> Version: 2.6.24-6
> Severity: important
>
>
> Run update-grub sets up only:
>
> Found Xen hypervisor 3.2-1-i386, kernel: //vmlinuz-2.6.18-6-xen-686
> Found kernel: //vmlinuz-2.6.24-1-686
> Found kernel: //vmlinuz
Please confirm, (and say in upstream bug) that unloading/reloading the
snd_hda_intel driver makes the sound work again after a suspend-resume
cycle.
(using "rmmod snd_hda_intel" and "modprobe snd_hda_intel")
You need to kill all applications using your soundboard to be able to
rmmod snd_hda_intel
On Fri, 09 May 2008, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, maximilian attems said:
> > how is 2.6.25 in sid doing?
>
> Slightly better, but it still drops the connection 3 times during
> apt-get source linux-2.6
>
> It's also quicker to reassociate - it's only about 3-5 seconds now
Your message dated Sat, 10 May 2008 00:23:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: system unbootable after update to linux-image-2.6.21-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #433127,
regarding system unbootable after update to linux-image-2.6.21-2
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 10 May 2008 12:06:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686: ath5k gets stuck at 1Mbits/s and
dhclient can't get an address
has caused the Debian Bug report #464114,
regarding linux-image-2.6.24-1-686: ath5k gets stuck at 1M
On Fri, 09 May 2008, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Friday, 09 May 2008 at 17:19, maximilian attems wrote:
> > how is 2.6.25 from sid doing?
> > installs just fine in testing?
>
> I've just installed 2.6.25-1-686. I'll let you know how it holds up.
good thanks :)
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Wed, 07 May 2008, Michael Meskes wrote:
> I'm experiencing the same problem on my HP nx7400 laptop but do not get
> the lost interrupts. The system simply freezes after only a very short
> uptime, sometimes even during the boot process. No output given.
>
> I tried both, the amd64 and the 686
On Sat, 10 May 2008, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> Sorry if the message is very long.
> I couldn't find any similar reports in bugzilla.kernel.org, if you have
> no more ideas I'll report it there too.
> Thanks!
yes please file upstream as the regression persists with 2.6.26-rc1.
let us know the upstr
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Jos Ewert wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-686
> Version: 2.6.24+13
> Severity: normal
>
please check against 2.6.25 in unstable,
installs just fine in testing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
On Tue, 06 May 2008, Miroslaw Kwasniak wrote:
>
> I have Athlon XP on Gigabyte GA-7ZX MB and Matrox MGA450.
>
> I have no problems running linux-image-2.6.22-3-k7
>
> With newest 2.6.2{4,5}-1-686 can't start xserver in proper
> frequency range.
>
> I've tested with:
> - fresh xorg.conf -> CRT m
Your message dated Sat, 10 May 2008 00:25:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line RE: linux-headers-2.6-amd64: Depends on non-existent package
has caused the Debian Bug report #479449,
regarding linux-headers-2.6-amd64: Depends on non-existent package
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 10 May 2008 12:05:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#480171: linux-image-2.6.25-1-486: Pb dualboot
XP/debian with the new b44 and ssb drivers
has caused the Debian Bug report #480171,
regarding linux-image-2.6.25-1-486: Pb dualboot XP/deb
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> how is 2.6.25 in unstable doing? installs just fine in Testing.
Looks really good! I've barely tested it so far, but it does look
promising. Specifically: The two problems reported in this bug seem to
be gone. DHCP works. Auto speed negotiation
maximilian attems a écrit :
> On Thu, 08 May 2008, giggz wrote:
>
>> Package: linux-image-2.6.25-1-486
>> Version: 2.6.25-1
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have debian sid and XP on my laptop. I have just tested 2.6.25. All
>> work good for me except a strange behaviour with b44 and ssb.
>>
Your message dated Sat, 10 May 2008 06:32:31 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475283: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.24-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #475283,
regarding [linux-source-2.6.24] known kernel bug/warning in fs/inotify.c:172
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sat, 10 May 2008 06:32:31 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#477270: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.24-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #477270,
regarding linux-2.6: slab-fix-bootstrap-on-memoryless-node.patch causes memory
corruption
to be marked as done.
Mapping testing to testing-proposed-updates.
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.24-7.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.24-7.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.24-7.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.24-7.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.24_2.6.24-7_all.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.24_2.6.24-7_al
31 matches
Mail list logo
