Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I just tried 2.6.24 kernel and unfortunately I can not use it - this PC
has only USB ports to connect keyboard and USB does not work in 2.6.24.
First error message I get from ker
ma> that's bad as linux-image-k7 did get droped without upgrade path yet
ma> use linux-image-686 from now on. works fine on k7 hardware.
Thanks for telling me otherwise I would have been left standing at the
bus stop waiting for no bus for months!
P.S.: just how does one track the doc package?:
htt
A user of LFS LiveCD reported a similar problem in the past. We were able to
solve this by adding the following lines to /etc/modprobe.conf:
options iwl3945 disable_hw_scan=1
options iwl4965 disable_hw_scan=1
Does this work for you?
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:29:00AM +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
> > Package: linux-source-2.6.24
> > Version: 2.6.24-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > >From http://intellinuxwireless.org/?p=iwlwifi&n=downloads
> > there is a very much newer version of iwlwi
Here is my latest update on this bug:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9648#c10
Either the sky2 driver or my hardware is broken.
So I put there a different network card and now the 64 bit Debian works
perfectly. More info above.
Ondrej
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 457967 linux-2.6
Bug#457967: linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64: kernel Oops, (segfault) when
downloading from net
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Sto
Just found another type of Seagate drives that shows this behaviour : ST310211A
Can this one be blacklisted as well ?
Bart
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> Because of changes in the installation procedure since I implemented
> the "sarge-support" udeb, I first needed to ensure installation of the
> etch-support udeb is queued in cdrom-detect and iso-scan. With that, we
> will have the following situation
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> I have been quite disappointed that there was no real follow-up to my
> mails, which now leaves us in the situation that there is basically no
> support yet to select the correct kernel for etch+1/2.
Being the sucker that I am, I did start to look int
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686
Version: 2.6.22-6
Followup-For: Bug #388453
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:00:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
|| Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:58:11 +0100
|| From: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|| Subject: Re: fails to ha
Your message dated Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:07:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line m68k: asm/cachectl.h ?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:59:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linux-image-2.6.22-1-amd64: Ethernet not functioning on Nvidia
MCP51
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:01:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Marvell Gigabit Ethernet Controller (driver sky2) gives bad
UDP checksum
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:58:11 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fails to handle interrupt
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:54:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linux-2.6: using lvs_sync_daemon makes the load increase by
1.0 (fixed upstream)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:49:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line access to large RAID arrays on Adaptec 2400A RAID controller
with dpt_i2o module causes system hang
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 449247 + pending
Bug#449247: linux-2.6: Please enable CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 441348 + pending
Bug#441348: linux-: option HID_FF is disabled; force feedback does not work
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing he
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> merge 460816 460896
Bug#460816: linux-image-2.6.18-5-vserver-686: CONFIG_XID_TAG_NFSD
Bug#460896: linux-image-2.6.18-5-vserver-686: CONFIG_XID_TAG_NFSD
Merged 460816 460896.
>
End o
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:23:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line please enable CIFS_XATTR and CIFS_POSIX
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi Maks,
Could you please provide a rationale when downgrading bugs like this? To an
outside observer, it looks to me as if this module package truly is
"unusable or mostly so" as a result of this bug.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:49:02AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ma> could you reproduce that on newer kernels?
> ma> 2.6.24 in unstable should appear tomorrow has an lilo fix.
> All I know is that I track linux-image-k7 on sid and I will be sure to
> let you know the next time anything bad hap
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2008 22:44:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463508: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686: nfs4 client crash on
long filename
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
> please against 2.6.24 found in unstable.
> nfsd had some updates since.
The problem is fixed in 2.6.24-1.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ma> could you reproduce that on newer kernels?
ma> 2.6.24 in unstable should appear tomorrow has an lilo fix.
All I know is that I track linux-image-k7 on sid and I will be sure to
let you know the next time anything bad happens to me. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 463860 atl2-source
Bug#463860: No wifis detected
Bug reassigned from package `atl2-modules-2.6.24-1-686' to `atl2-source'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> severity 463860 normal
Bug#463860: No wifis detected
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
Package: atl2-modules-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24+2.0.3-1
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Although ath5k is loaded, iwlist detects no wifis.
Other people have the same problem:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=463353 (the latter bug is
for madwif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With all comments that has been sent to this thread, I've changed the
timeline to the following:
+--+---+
| Date | What happens |
+---
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:26:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463839: linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-vserver-686: serial
console management not possible with serial drivers compiled in
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-vserver-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-17
Severity: normal
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2005-08/msg00472.html
bit of a pain, this one. remote servers, only accessible via serial
links and power-switches. there's no HOWTO out there describing
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 06:51:09PM +0100, Daniel Huhardeaux wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo tcpdump -v -i wlan0
> tcpdump: WARNING: wlan0: no IPv4 address assigned
> tcpdump: listening on wlan0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size
> 96 bytes
>
> 0 packets captured
> 0 packets received
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.24-2
Severity: important
As in the 2.6.23 debian's kernels, the PATA controller in the SantaRosa
chipset (8086:2850) is non managed by the ata_piix kernel driver.
On the Lenovo Thinkpad R61 (but I know
maximilian attems a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 04:23:03PM +0100, Daniel Huhardeaux wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo tcpdump wlan0
tcpdump: WARNING: wmaster0: no IPv4 address assigned
tcpdump: syntax error
tcpdump -v -i
Sorry for the mistake :-[ Here is the output:
[EMAIL PR
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 04:23:03PM +0100, Daniel Huhardeaux wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo tcpdump wlan0
> tcpdump: WARNING: wmaster0: no IPv4 address assigned
> tcpdump: syntax error
tcpdump -v -i
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> since rt2x00-modules-* doesn't depend on the linux-image used to build
> it, it's not automatically removed with that linux-image.
I agree that it might be desirable for module packages to be removed
along with the kernel they can be used with. However, i
retitle 463808 [mips] kernel crashes because of data bus error
thanks
I better intestigate on what a "dbe" is, so I better describe the
problem :-(
Bye,
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maximilian attems a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:02:03AM +0100, root wrote:
With dhcp server, the iwl3945 module doesn't accept dhcp request (D-Ling WRT54G
with OpenWRT/White Russian 0.9).
Previous ipw3945 modules with 2.6.[..|22|23] kernel version are working perfectly.
show rel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 463808 [mips] kernel crashes because of data bus error
Bug#463808: kernel crash (Cause : 041c)
Changed Bug title to `[mips] kernel crashes because of data bus error' from
`kernel crash (Cause : 041c)'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:29:00AM +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.24
> Version: 2.6.24-1
> Severity: normal
>
> >From http://intellinuxwireless.org/?p=iwlwifi&n=downloads
> there is a very much newer version of iwlwifi available
> http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/iwlwifi/do
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 03:14:32PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Btw, this is a reason why I'd suggest to use
>
> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER=n
> CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT=y
>
> for the etch'n half kernel (given that it's 2.6.24). But I'm sure you
>
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-r5k-ip32
Versione: 2.6.24-2
Severity: important
Today I tried latest kernel and found this error. I did at least 5
reboot in a total of 3 hours, since the machine never survived more than
half an hour.
Hardware: SGI O2, cpu [EMAIL PROTECTED] V2.1, memory 384Mb.
Bye,
Package: linux-source-2.6.24
Version: 2.6.24-1
Severity: normal
>From http://intellinuxwireless.org/?p=iwlwifi&n=downloads
there is a very much newer version of iwlwifi available
http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/iwlwifi/downloads/iwlwifi-1.2.24.tgz
instead of the 1.1.17kds available in debian's 2
maximilian attems wrote:
>
> ack
> it seems that userspaces didn't yet grok up the /sys interface,
Btw, this is a reason why I'd suggest to use
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER=n
CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT=y
for the etch'n half kernel (given that it's 2.6.24).
This one time, at band camp, maximilian attems said:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 03:14:05AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> >
> > No change with:
> > Linux version 2.6.24-trunk-686 (Debian 2.6.24-trunk1~snapshot.10302)
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.3 20070718 (prerelease) (Debian
> > 4.1.2-1
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.24-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
The "b43legacy" driver produces an oops on my system (an Apple PowerBook
G4, 1.3Ghz). Please see the kernel dmesg output below for details.
(or ask me, if that's not enough...)
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Lin
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-2
Severity: normal
ath5k doesn't assotiate with my AP, the module loads fine tough:
Feb 3 12:50:06 freedom kernel: ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :02:02.0
disabled
Feb 3 12:50:20 freedom kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :02:02.0[A] -> GSI 21
Jurij Smakov a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:02:03AM +0100, root wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.24-2
Severity: important
With dhcp server, the iwl3945 module doesn't accept dhcp request (D-Ling WRT54G
with OpenWRT/White Russian 0.9).
Previous ipw3945 modules w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 463253 + pending
Bug#463253: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64: Bring back /proc/acpi
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 03:14:05AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> No change with:
> Linux version 2.6.24-trunk-686 (Debian 2.6.24-trunk1~snapshot.10302)
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.3 20070718 (prerelease) (Debian
> 4.1.2-14+2)) #1 SMP Thu Jan 31 03:10:29 UTC 2008
>
> Will repull tomorr
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 05:27:16AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> reopen 463253
> thanks
it doesn't really matter if that one is open as at least another
got filed.
> please reconsider your decision. This is not the right way to handle
> such issues, as it breaks the systems for lots of people.
>
maximilian attems schrieb:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 05:27:16AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> please reconsider your decision. This is not the right way to handle
>> such issues, as it breaks the systems for lots of people.
>> I, as co-maintainer of hal, can't immediately come up with a patch. Th
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 17:30 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> Unfortunately the Xen domain builder isn't capable of loading a native
> bzImage directly -- it requires the ELF vmlinux. I hacked
> around that when I was playing with Xen enabled d-i and
> then promptly forgot I had done so, which is a
53 matches
Mail list logo
