On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 05:27:16AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > reopen 463253 > thanks
it doesn't really matter if that one is open as at least another got filed. > please reconsider your decision. This is not the right way to handle > such issues, as it breaks the systems for lots of people. > I, as co-maintainer of hal, can't immediately come up with a patch. This > takes time to test and do properly. ack it seems that userspaces didn't yet grok up the /sys interface, was worth a try, will be redone in april. > The right way to do this, is file bugs against all relevant packages, > add a tracking bug and when all apps have been ported to the new > interface, remove the deprecated interface from the kernel. > The current approach is a disservice to our users. can you push the fix for the "double" battery in hal when both are enabled? sunny weekend -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
