By the way, I only found this problem on my IBM T43 laptop. On
another computer, which has the same system and kernel, it is OK
however.
--
HZ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 463253
Bug#463253: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64: Bring back /proc/acpi
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
reopen 463253
thanks
Hi maks,
please reconsider your decision. This is not the right way to handle
such issues, as it breaks the systems for lots of people.
I, as co-maintainer of hal, can't immediately come up with a patch. This
takes time to test and do properly.
The right way to do this, is fi
This one time, at band camp, maximilian attems said:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 07:21:18PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > I only see this when pulling reasonable amounts of traffic (doing a pull
> > from my local mirror or something else that generates both a large
> > amount of transferred data and
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:02:03AM +0100, root wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64
> Version: 2.6.24-2
> Severity: important
>
>
> With dhcp server, the iwl3945 module doesn't accept dhcp request (D-Ling
> WRT54G with OpenWRT/White Russian 0.9).
> Previous ipw3945 modules with 2.6.[..|2
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:02:03AM +0100, root wrote:
>
> With dhcp server, the iwl3945 module doesn't accept dhcp request (D-Ling
> WRT54G with OpenWRT/White Russian 0.9).
> Previous ipw3945 modules with 2.6.[..|22|23] kernel version are working
> perfectly.
>
show relevant tcpdump please.
On Friday 01 February 2008, dann frazier wrote:
> Is there anything special we need to add to deal with etch 1/2
> kernel metapackages? We were talking about using a name like
> linux-image-2.6-686-etchnhalf.
As I explained in my mails re etch+1/2 some time back [1] , D-I simply will
not install
* Giuseppe Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-02 16:06]:
> Hi, I am using a network card managed by "RealTek RTL-8169 Gigabit
> Ethernet driver" on an SGI O2 machine since many months without any
> problem.
> Would you please add this module to the package? A very simple patch is:
Applied, thanks
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.24-2
Severity: important
With dhcp server, the iwl3945 module doesn't accept dhcp request (D-Ling WRT54G
with OpenWRT/White Russian 0.9).
Previous ipw3945 modules with 2.6.[..|22|23] kernel version are working
perfectly.
-- Package-specific in
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>We have 2.6.22 as a safe bed on lenny now and their udebs are there
>>too however since EtchAndHalf intends to release with 2.6.24 and it
>>has been uploaded to sid already I'm considering a better option to
>>us to r
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 09:51:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> It's far to early to switch d-i to 2.6.24, especially since it drops
> support for most of /proc/acpi, including the parts used by
> laptop-detect.
I still think this switch was an extremely premature and really, really
bad idea.
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 07:21:18PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Feb 2 19:15:40 spartacus kernel: ath1: No ProbeResp from current AP
> 00:0f:b5:9b:42:e6 - assume out of range
> Feb 2 19:15:42 spartacus kernel: ath1: Initial auth_alg=0
> Feb 2 19:15:42 spartacus kernel: ath1: authenticate with AP
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-2
Severity: normal
Feb 2 19:15:40 spartacus kernel: ath1: No ProbeResp from current AP
00:0f:b5:9b:42:e6 - assume out of range
Feb 2 19:15:42 spartacus kernel: ath1: Initial auth_alg=0
Feb 2 19:15:42 spartacus kernel: ath1: authenticate with AP
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.91d
Severity: important
Hello,
At running 'update-initramfs -k all -u', update-initramfs tries to
update only nonexistant initramfs images, and ignores the ones that
actually do exist:
# update-initramfs -k all -u
/boot/initrd.img-2.6.22-4-amd64-resivo does no
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-2
Severity: normal
Hello,
After installing this new kernel image, hwclock could not work now.
For example, hwclock --systohc will report
select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out
As a result, /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh will fail and the sy
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-2
Followup-For: Bug #463611
I have the same problem (missing /proc/acpi/battery) on my IBM T42. Here
is the content of my /proc/acpi folder:
dr-xr-xr-x 5 root root 0 2008-02-02 18:04 button
-r 1 root root 0 2008-02-02 18:04 dsdt
dr-xr-xr-x
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-r5k-ip32
Versione: 2.6.24-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi, I am using a network card managed by "RealTek RTL-8169 Gigabit
Ethernet driver" on an SGI O2 machine since many months without any
problem.
Would you please add this module to the package? A very simple p
I'm having simular problems.
I've tried booting with parameters like:
video:intelfb:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But it never seems to be loading the intelfb module.
When I modprobe it, I always get this:
intelfb: Framebuffer driver for Intel(R)
830M/845G/852GM/855GM/865G/915G/915GM/945G/945GM chipsets
in
Package: virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.22-3-k7
Version: 2.6.22+1.5.2-dfsg2-9
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
An alias configuration should be provided for the kernel module
virtualbox-ose.ko.
VirtualBox itself requires the module vboxdrv to be loaded in kernel an
Package: linux-headers-2.6.18-5-k7
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-17
Severity: normal
Hello,
as per the output below:
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ls -l /usr/src
total 12
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root src25 2007-12-23 21:29 linux -> linux-headers-2.6.18-5-k7
drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 4096 2008-02-02 12:17 linux-he
* Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-02 03:50]:
> If indeed it is a violation, what would be your advice? It seems that
> 2.6.24 is eventually going to be used for etchnhalf, and without
> updating these patches, users will not be able to use etchnhalf on the
> Linksys NSLU2. Any help
Hi Martin
On Feb 2, 2008 4:19 AM, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If series/1 file has
> + a
> + b
> simply use the following in series/2
> - a
> - b
> + a_v2
> + b_v2
> or put in a third patch relative to a and b.
Ok, I'll do this. Thanks.
Gordon
--
Gordon Farquharson
GnuPG Key
Hi Bastian
On Feb 2, 2008 3:34 AM, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NACK. One _must_ not edit patches which are already released and used in
> the main patch series. This is a GPL violation problem, so I am going to
> revert it myself.
Surely one could argue that the source is still av
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 09:46:16AM +, Gordon Farquharson wrote:
> Author: gordon-guest
> Date: Sat Feb 2 09:46:12 2008
> New Revision: 10372
>
> Modified:
>dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/patches/features/arm/ixp4xx-net-drivers.patch
>dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/patches/features/arm/ixp4xx-
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 09:51:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> It's far to early to switch d-i to 2.6.24, especially since it drops
> support for most of /proc/acpi, including the parts used by
> laptop-detect.
I suspect you already know this, but for the record, that's not an
intrinsic property of
atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.24-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.24-2_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.24-2_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.24-2_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-686_2.6.24-2_i386.deb
to po
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.24-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.24-2.dsc
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.24-2.tar.gz
atl2-modules-2.6.24-1-486_2.6.24+2.0.3-2_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.24-2_i386.deb
aufs-modules-2.6.24-
27 matches
Mail list logo
