Please find, for review, the debconf templates and packages descriptions for
the redhat-cluster source package.
This review will last from Monday, January 07, 2008 to Thursday, January 17,
2008.
Please send reviews as unified diffs (diff -u) against the original
files. Comments about your propo
Accepted:
cman_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/r/redhat-cluster/cman_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb
gfs-tools_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/r/redhat-cluster/gfs-tools_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb
gfs2-tools_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/r/redhat-cluster/gfs2-tools_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb
gn
Back in April, 2007, I opened this bug because of problems with
"NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out" errors.
I found that changing one of my BIOS settings seemed to make the
problem go away. The setup menu named "Resource Configuration"
offers a setting named "Shared PCI IRQs". I found t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> found 440445 2.6.23-1
Bug#440445: linux-2.6 - dies after some time on t2000 since .22
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.23-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
> I get what seems to be similar problems with linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
> as well as self-compiled kernels from Debian sources.
can you try newer 2.6.22 from backports.org
or 2.6.23 from unstable they install just fine in stable?
they all have newer alsa.
thanks for feedback
--
maks
--
To
**
【INCLUBのメルマガお宝情報】（くじ付き）
◆貴方のビジネスパートナーです◆
**
★「くじ」に当たれば有料独占広告が３回無料で配信できます
「くじ」はメルマガの最後の方にあります（１日３回まで）
[EMAIL PROTECTE
redhat-cluster_2.20080107-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
redhat-cluster_2.20080107-1.dsc
redhat-cluster_2.20080107.orig.tar.gz
redhat-cluster_2.20080107-1.diff.gz
cman_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb
libcman2_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb
libcman-dev_2.20080107
as some of you guys have a real usage scenario for lilo
i checked and got zero output:
./lilo --help 2>&1 | grep -- -H
lilo does not print that flag yet in it's usage,
so get that fixed first then i can use it in update-initramfs.
happy hacking
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
FYI: The status of the initramfs-tools source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.91c
Current version: 0.91d
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Your message dated Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:07:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458142: missing header files for mac80211
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:44:02PM +, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> adjust path for {build,source,modules.*} for m68k only
This is a workaround for some generic problem. The kernel thinks it have
a different EXTRAVERSION than the package. Please revert and fix the
real problem.
Bastian
--
maximilian attems wrote:
can you still reproduce that with an Etch debian installer image
or better with a newer Lenny install image?
thanks for feedback.
I'm sorry to report that I no longer have an Alpha, so I can't provide
any further feedback.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Your message dated Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:20:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linux-image-2.6.16-1-686-smp: IDE controller not detected.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:18:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line problems with hdparm and udev during boot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:13:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line unable to register OSS PCM device 0:0 for snd-intel8x0 with
dxr3 card
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:21:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line snd-emu10k1: wont talk to my soundcard
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Gerard Robin wrote:
> At the boot, after this line:
> DHCPDISCOVER on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
> I get:
> Bug soft lokup CPU1# stuck for 11s [wpa_supplicant: 2857]
> -8<---
> and my box freezes ...
>
> The problem doesn't arise each time.
>
>
can you reproduce the bug with linux-image-2.6.18-5-686 ?
also this sounds more like an lilo failure?
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> severity 458429 important
Bug#458429: linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64: CPU#1 stuck for 11s [wpa_supplicant:
2857]
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> severity 457044 important
Bug#457044: My box didn't reboot after upgrading linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 07:50:02PM +0100, Julien Valroff wrote:
>
> Le dimanche 06 janvier 2008 à 19:18 +0100, maximilian attems a écrit :
> > > when running update-initramfs without specifying a kernel version (-k),
> > > the
> > > default version should be the latest kernel version (according t
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 04:00:39PM +0100, Jens Thiele wrote:
> Let me see if I got you right:
> You want to mark it as wontfix because older versions of lilo do
> not provide -H => if one adds -H to the lilo invocations in
> update-initramfs there might be problems during update from etch?
>
> May
Le dimanche 06 janvier 2008 à 19:18 +0100, maximilian attems a écrit :
> > when running update-initramfs without specifying a kernel version (-k), the
> > default version should be the latest kernel version (according to manpage).
> >
> > It is not in my case:
> > $ ls /var/lib/initramfs-tools/
> when running update-initramfs without specifying a kernel version (-k), the
> default version should be the latest kernel version (according to manpage).
>
> It is not in my case:
> $ ls /var/lib/initramfs-tools/
> 2.6.22-3-amd64 2.6.23-1-amd64
>
> $ ls /boot/initrd.*
> /boot/initrd.im
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.91d
Severity: normal
Hi,
when running update-initramfs without specifying a kernel version (-k), the
default version should be the latest kernel version (according to manpage).
It is not in my case:
$ ls /var/lib/initramfs-tools/
2.6.22-3-amd64 2.6.23-1-a
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> as debian supports partial upgrades and initramfs-tools is not gonna
> start depend on lilo this inocation can only be used after Lenny
> release. marking as wontfix.
Let me see if I got you right:
You want to mark it as wontfix because older versi
26 matches
Mail list logo
