Just spent half an hour since my slug wouldn't boot and I had to reflash
an old initramfs. This bug should be fixed ASAP before it breaks a lot
of systems.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/initramfs>mkinitramfs -o out -k
Working files in /root/tmp/mkinitramfs_tj3082 and overlay in
/root/tmp/mkinitramfs-OL_
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:49:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Martin Habets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 01:07:46 +0100
>
> > On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 03:59:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > Alternatively we can have a KCONFIG variable with reversed
> > > logic, like "EM
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311357: fixed in kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8 2.6.8-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323557: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-i386 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336153: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64 2.6.8-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349774: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349774: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc 2.6.8-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354493: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323557: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64 2.6.8-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:28 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354493: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-s390 2.6.8-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349774: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354493: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa 2.6.8-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311357: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-i386 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311357: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64 2.6.8-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323557: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372621: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311357: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317286: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:28 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311357: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-s390 2.6.8-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323557: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc 2.6.8-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336153: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc 2.6.8-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317286: fixed in kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8 2.6.8-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:28 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372621: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-s390 2.6.8-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:28 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323557: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-s390 2.6.8-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372621: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc 2.6.8-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321442: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311357: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc 2.6.8-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321442: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317286: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354493: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321442: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-i386 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:28 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349774: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-s390 2.6.8-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349774: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa 2.6.8-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321442: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64 2.6.8-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311357: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349774: fixed in kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8 2.6.8-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323557: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317286: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc 2.6.8-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321442: fixed in kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8 2.6.8-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:28 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321442: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-s390 2.6.8-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372621: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-i386 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354493: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc 2.6.8-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:28 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336153: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-s390 2.6.8-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349774: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64 2.6.8-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372621: fixed in kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8 2.6.8-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336153: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa 2.6.8-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317286: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64 2.6.8-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349774: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-i386 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336153: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-i386 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321442: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa 2.6.8-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354493: fixed in kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8 2.6.8-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372621: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354493: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64 2.6.8-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336153: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336153: fixed in kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8 2.6.8-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354493: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-i386 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317286: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-i386 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321442: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc 2.6.8-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336153: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha 2.6.8-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372621: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa 2.6.8-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323557: fixed in kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8 2.6.8-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372621: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64 2.6.8-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323557: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa 2.6.8-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311357: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa 2.6.8-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.6.8-13-amd64-generic_2.6.8-17_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64/kernel-headers-2.6.8-13-amd64-generic_2.6.8-17_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-13-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.8-17_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64/kernel-headers-2.6.8-13-amd64-k8-sm
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:28 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317286: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-s390 2.6.8-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 23:06:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317286: fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa 2.6.8-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-386_2.6.8-17_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-i386/kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-386_2.6.8-17_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-686-smp_2.6.8-17_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-i386/kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-686-smp_2.6.8-17_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2
Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-generic_2.6.8-17_alpha.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha/kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-generic_2.6.8-17_alpha.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-smp_2.6.8-17_alpha.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha/kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-smp_2.6.8-17_alpha.deb
kernel-hea
Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.6-itanium-smp_2.6.8-15_ia64.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64/kernel-headers-2.6-itanium-smp_2.6.8-15_ia64.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-itanium_2.6.8-15_ia64.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64/kernel-headers-2.6-itanium_2.6.8-15_ia64.deb
kernel-headers-2
Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4_2.6.8-6_s390.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-s390/kernel-headers-2.6.8-4_2.6.8-6_s390.deb
kernel-image-2.6.8-4-s390-tape_2.6.8-6_s390.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-s390/kernel-image-2.6.8-4-s390-tape_2.6.8-6_s390.deb
kernel-image-2.6.8-4-s390_2.6
Accepted:
kernel-build-2.6.8-4_2.6.8-16_sparc.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc/kernel-build-2.6.8-4_2.6.8-16_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-sparc32_2.6.8-16_sparc.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc/kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-sparc32_2.6.8-16_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4
Accepted:
kernel-build-2.6.8-4-power3-smp_2.6.8-13_powerpc.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8/kernel-build-2.6.8-4-power3-smp_2.6.8-13_powerpc.deb
kernel-build-2.6.8-4-power3_2.6.8-13_powerpc.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8/kernel-build-2.6.8-4-power3_2.6.8-13_powerp
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.88
Severity: important
After upgrade to 0.88 (it works with etch's 0.87b), I cannot create
initramfs anymore:
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-4-686
Error: missing mapper/cr_hda root /dev/mapper/cr_hda5 /sys entry
The root seems to be
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Clayton wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2007 15:23:20 +0200
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:04:10PM +0800, clayton wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6.20-1-686
> > > Version: 2.6.20-3
> > > Severity: normal
> >
> > can you please tes
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Rafal Czlonka wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > hmmm never seen,
> > can you pleas post the output of
> > sh -x mkinitramfs-kpkg
>
> + set -eu
thanks and urrgs please post output of
sh -x mkinitramfs-kpkg -o /tmp/fooo
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 426440 linux-2.6
Bug#426440: /usr/sbin/pppd: sometimes connection with Option GlobeTrotter card
hangs, ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
Bug reassigned from package `ppp' to `linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
reassign 426440 linux-2.6
thanks
On May 28, Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
Not related to user space unless the contrary is proven.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear Co-Workers!
Bug#33522 [1] might not be of relevance but it characterizes my problems
pretty good.
In this spirit
Yours Gernot
---
[1]
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.bugs.dist/browse_thread/thread/554a7a34bf236bbe/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Monday 28 May 2007 19:06, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> No, we are volunteers, who do this out of our free time and work.
I know this ... But I am saying that you should not be concentrated on some
kind of "silly fights"...
>
> > Listen, I know something about C and C++ programming and I have to muc
Package: linux-source-2.6.18
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch2
Dear Co-Worker!
Well I actually do not know who to blame, but my system shows some strange
behaviour during booting. On Saturday, it claimed that ide_cd is missing,
yesterday I have got a lot of "hda: dma_intr: status=0x58"-error messa
Package: kernel-image-2.6-em64t-p4-smp
Followup-For: Bug #409616
As kdetv does not crash my machine now, when using the correct kernel
image package "linux-image-2.6.20-1-amd64_2.6.20-3", this bug can be
closed.
Best regards
Torquil Sørensen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 06:11:29PM +0100, Paweł Krzywicki wrote:
> On Monday 28 May 2007 16:19, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> Hi !
> I'm not involved in your job at all, but I am a member of debian-kernel list
> because I like to read about : "What is new in this area ?" What I can see
> here is only p
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 12:49:09 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422273: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: Num Lock light indicator
stopped functioning
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
On Monday 28 May 2007 16:19, Sven Luther wrote:
Hi !
I'm not involved in your job at all, but I am a member of debian-kernel list
because I like to read about : "What is new in this area ?" What I can see
here is only personal issues unfortunately. I am telling You it is not worth
it... People
(new) kernel-build-2.6.8-4-power3-smp_2.6.8-13_powerpc.deb optional devel
build infrastructure for kernel version 2.6.8-4-power3-smp
.
Together with kernel-headers-2.6.8-4, this package provides the
infrastructure for building additional modules for 2.6.8-4-power3-smp.
(new) kernel-build-2.6.8-4
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 19:06:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Problem might be due to defect sectors
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
(new) kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-generic_2.6.8-17_alpha.deb optional devel
Linux kernel headers 2.6.8 on Alpha
This package provides kernel header files for version 2.6.8 on
the Alpha architecture,
for sites that want the latest kernel headers.
Please read /usr/share/doc/kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-gene
(new) kernel-build-2.6.8-4_2.6.8-16_sparc.deb optional devel
Headers for building modules for Linux 2.6.8
This package provides kernel header files for building modules for the
precompiled kernel images on the 64-bit SPARC architecture (uniprocessor and
multiprocessor.)
(new) kernel-headers-2.6.
(new) kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-386_2.6.8-17_i386.deb optional devel
Linux kernel headers 2.6.8 on 386
This package provides kernel header files for version 2.6.8 on 386.
Please read /usr/share/doc/kernel-headers-2.6.8-4/debian.README.gz for
details
(new) kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-686-smp_2.6.8-17_i38
(new) kernel-headers-2.6.8-13-amd64-generic_2.6.8-17_i386.deb optional devel
Linux kernel headers 2.6.8 for generic x86_64 systems
This package provides kernel header files for version 2.6.8 on all x86_64
systems, for sites that want the latest kernel headers. Please read
/usr/share/doc/kernel-h
(new) kernel-headers-2.6.8-4_2.6.8-6_s390.deb optional devel
Header files related to Linux kernel version 2.6.8 on IBM S/390
This package provides kernel header files for version 2.6.8 on IBM S/390,
for sites that want the latest kernel headers. Please read
/usr/share/doc/kernel-headers-2.6.8/de
kernel-headers-2.6-itanium-smp_2.6.8-15_ia64.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64/kernel-headers-2.6-itanium-smp_2.6.8-15_ia64.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-itanium_2.6.8-15_ia64.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64/kernel-headers-2.6-itanium_2.6.8-15_ia64.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-mckinley
kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64_2.6.8-15_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64_2.6.8-15.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64_2.6.8-15.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4_2.6.8-15_ia64.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-itanium-smp_2.6.8-15_ia64.deb
kernel-image-2.6-it
kernel-image-2.6.8-i386_2.6.8-17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.8-i386_2.6.8-17.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.8-i386_2.6.8-17.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4_2.6.8-17_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-686_2.6.8-17_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6.8-4-68
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8_2.6.8-13_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8_2.6.8-13.dsc
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8_2.6.8-13.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4_2.6.8-13_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6.8-4-power3_2.6.8-13_powerpc.deb
ker
kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64_2.6.8-17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64_2.6.8-17.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64_2.6.8-17.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.8-13_2.6.8-17_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-13-amd64-k8_2.6.8-17_i386.deb
kernel-image
kernel-image-2.6.8-s390_2.6.8-6_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.8-s390_2.6.8-6.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.8-s390_2.6.8-6.tar.gz
kernel-patch-2.6.8-s390_2.6.8-6_all.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4_2.6.8-6_s390.deb
kernel-image-2.6.8-4-s390_2.6.8-
kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha_2.6.8-17_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha_2.6.8-17.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha_2.6.8-17.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4_2.6.8-17_alpha.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-smp_2.6.8-17_alpha.deb
kernel-image-2.6
kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc_2.6.8-16_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc_2.6.8-16.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc_2.6.8-16.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4_2.6.8-16_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-4-sparc32_2.6.8-16_sparc.deb
kernel-image
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
