Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:57:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402999: reproducible in 2.6.18?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 03:24:13PM -0800, Jeff Carr wrote:
> I just installed a new machine and noticed I couldn't apt-get
> initrd-tools. It looks like it might have been accidentally deleted by
> an automated script:
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/initrd-tools/news/20070103T061312Z.html
I'
On Thursday January 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks for the report, and the patch. Has the raid1 recovery fix been
> submitted upstream yet?
I've sent it to Andrew Morton. I suspect it will be in 2.6.20
I'll be sending it to -stable later today.
NeilBrown
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
I just installed a new machine and noticed I couldn't apt-get
initrd-tools. It looks like it might have been accidentally deleted by
an automated script:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/initrd-tools/news/20070103T061312Z.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405085: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402707: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#407671: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405150: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401006: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401187: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#406767: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404216: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402876: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402743: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392592: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378542: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402707: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405196: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390862: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402707: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402475: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403790: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401980: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394753: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388870: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#406124: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400524: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401980: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401980: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402787: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402812: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391867: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401006: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334104: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 404950 [mips] Disk is advertised as partition on SWARM (Broadcom
> BCM91250a)
Bug#404950: [mips] Shows wrong description for disk (Broadcom BCM91250a)
Changed Bug title.
> clone 404950 -1
Bug#404950: [mips] Disk is advertised as partition on S
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405203: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404447: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292318: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402253: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:40:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401006: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz
linux-d
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
grep devpts /etc/init.d/*
You must be missing one of the packages that usualy mount it.
MfG
Goswin
It is there .. The problem was that /dev/pts didn't exist, which caused
the mount of devpts to fail. Maybe this is because I'm not running udev
inside the
Stijn Tintel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Stijn Tintel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>> Bastian
>>>
>>> The machine were I reported this problem from, is running Debian Etch +
>>> Xen. Everything is installed from packages from the Etch repository, no
>>> sel
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Stijn Tintel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bastian
The machine were I reported this problem from, is running Debian Etch + Xen.
Everything is installed from packages from the Etch repository, no self-built
packages, etc.
Do you have devpts mounted?
MfG
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz
linux-doc-2.6.18_2
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.18_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9_all.deb
lin
Rejected: linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9.dsc refers to
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in the
pool.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.18_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.18_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
* Krzysztof Grzeslo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-24 13:26]:
> I have searched many debian mirrors, and could not find
> kernel-sources-2.6.11.deb packet. Was it removed from distribution?
> I have found kernel-image but i need sources (for x86 architecture).
> Can anyone help me?
You want linux-so
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 13:26, Krzysztof Grzeslo wrote:
> I have searched many debian mirrors, and could not find
> kernel-sources-2.6.11.deb packet. Was it removed from distribution? I
> have found kernel-image but i need sources (for x86 architecture). Can
> anyone help me?
Look for linux-s
Hello,
I have searched many debian mirrors, and could not find
kernel-sources-2.6.11.deb packet. Was it removed from distribution? I have
found kernel-image but i need sources (for x86 architecture). Can anyone help
me?
with kind regards,
Krzysztof Grzeslo
--
Network Support
Qosmotec Softwa
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:53:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408203: Xen kernel has no /dev/snapshot support
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
52 matches
Mail list logo
