Bug#403405: can't reproduce

2007-01-12 Thread James McCaw
Hi On 11/01/07, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hey James, Can you provide a log of the errors you get when loading raw1394? I'm unable to reproduce with 2.6.18-8. gscanbus works fine for me; granted, I don't actually have any devices on my bus (I don't own any). Everything worked fi

Bug#376229: linux-image-2.6.17-1-k7: Another BUG invalid opcode

2007-01-12 Thread Jerry Quinn
maximilian attems wrote: On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Jerry Quinn wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.17-1-k7 Version: 2.6.17-2 Followup-For: Bug #376229 I've got more info from my kernel log while booting: Jul 10 23:03:13 smaug kernel: klogd 1.4.1#18, log source = /proc/kmsg started. Jul 10 23:03:13 sm

Bug#399113: xen kernel infinite loop processing core dump

2007-01-12 Thread Knock, Bob
> Hmm, I tried reproducing your bug in a vmware, and was not able to. Do > you still get the bug? Yes, it still happens for me using 2.6.18-8. > ./crash results in "Aborted", and only that, nothing new in dmesg. It would do that if you failed to enable core dumps via "ulimit -c unlimited". If yo

Bug#399113: xen kernel infinite loop processing core dump

2007-01-12 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Thu, Nov 30, 2006, Knock, Bob wrote: > Duplicated with linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-686. > Does not occur with the 2.6.16.29-xen kernel pulled from Xen 3.0.3 LiveCD. > Has anyone else duplicated this? Would there be any benefit to posting a > VMWare image? Hmm, I tried reproducing yo

Processed: Re: Bug#406601: network: remote host disconnected

2007-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 406601 linux-2.6 Bug#406601: network: remote host disconnected Warning: Unknown package 'network' Bug reassigned from package `network' to `linux-2.6'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug track

Bug#406601: network: remote host disconnected

2007-01-12 Thread jeanmichel
Package: network Severity: normal All remote host are disconected (rsync/samba, ssh ) Read from remote host simi: Connection timed out On the server, /var/log/messages contient: Jan 11 19:07:33 localhost kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth2: transmit timed out Jan 11 19:07:33 localhost kernel: sky2 h

Bug#376229: linux-image-2.6.17-1-k7: Another BUG invalid opcode

2007-01-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Jerry Quinn wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.17-1-k7 > Version: 2.6.17-2 > Followup-For: Bug #376229 > > I've got more info from my kernel log while booting: > > > Jul 10 23:03:13 smaug kernel: klogd 1.4.1#18, log source = /proc/kmsg started. > Jul 10 23:03:13 smaug kernel

Processed: closing 370195

2007-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > close 370195 Bug#370195: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: fails to bring up an NE2000 network card 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send a

Processed: closing 369906

2007-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > close 369906 Bug#369906: psmouse.c: Mouse at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization , throwing 1 bytes away 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closin

Processed: reassign 369941 to kernel-package

2007-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > reassign 369941 kernel-package Bug#369941: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686: Debconf question should be reworded, or upgrade mechanism made more clever Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6

Bug#406166: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.18-3-k7: Kernel BUG appeared in syslog [rt.ursine.ca #540])

2007-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:49:53 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#406166: linux-image-2.6.18-3-k7: Kernel BUG appeared in syslog [rt.ursine.ca #540] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#406640: Acknowledgement (arcmsr driver, abort device command of id=0 lun=0)

2007-01-12 Thread Ralf Gross
I changed the fs type of the RAID1 device from ext3 to xfs. Now I can't trigger the error with tiobench anymore. But I'm not sure if this just means that xfs hides some problems better than ext3. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA

Re: Bug#383248: Suggestion about usplash-themes

2007-01-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Daniel Baumann] > > Are there now any news about uploading the new usplash upstream version > > of ubuntu to debian? > > I believe that decision to Maximilian. If a new usplash version is > uploaded, a new version of debian-edu-artwork need to b

Bug#406640: arcmsr driver, abort device command of id=0 lun=0

2007-01-12 Thread Ralf Gross
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-amd64 Version: 2.6.18-7 Severity: important The arcmsr driver (ARC-1230 SATA-RAID controller) throws some error messages since adding 2 76GB Western Digital Raptor disks (WDC WD740ADFD-00NLR1) to the controller. The 2 disks are configured as RAID1 (Channel: 00 Id: 00

Processed: [bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2007-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report

Bug#403790: Problem exists only with debian etch

2007-01-12 Thread Alexander Gerasiov
maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:33:31PM +0100, Max Lindner wrote: > >>With an ubuntu/edgy client, there are no oopses for me, only with debian >>etch >> > > > can you please test latest sid buildservrer linux images > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel > they have a newer

Processed: bug 406581 is forwarded to http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=856

2007-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > forwarded 406581 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=856 Bug#406581: disk failures during access on SATA drives, Xen only Noted your statement that Bug has been for

Bug#406581: updates

2007-01-12 Thread martin f krafft
[ob-front: I tried to forward this bug to bugzilla.xensource.com but their system has failed to mail me a password in several hours. Maybe someone else could forward it, and add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the CC list in bugzilla?] I've run the following loop for several hours now on the non-Xen kernel w

Bug#368308: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: kernel Oops when trying to use ov511)

2007-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:47:04 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368308: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: kernel Oops when trying to use ov511 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-6_i386.changes REJECTED

2007-01-12 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
As requested by Kernel Team/maintainer --Jeroen === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-5_i386.changes REJECTED

2007-01-12 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
As requested by Kernel Team/maintainer (Bastian Blank) --Jeroen === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO