Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.18+5
Followup-For: Bug #398948
Hi!
I can confirm that the module "intelfb" isn't working.
Trying to load it I get "intelfb: cannot acquire agp"
It's reproducible with latest Debian's Kernel and with an own compiled
2.6.19 Kernel + beyound patch [1] (so it seems th
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 06:33:30PM -0500, Brent S. Elmer, Ph.D. wrote:
> Yes! I changed sbim to sbin and the kernel installed. So, what package
> does kernel-img.conf come with? That is the package that has the bug.
I know that its created by the installer, but after that I think it is
only twea
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:28:12PM +0100, DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre wrote:
> On remote, I ran:
> cat /dev/ttyS1 >>a24_0_5
> cat a24_0_5 | tr -d "\000\007" |sed s_^$'\x20'\$_REMOVETHISLINE_g |sed
> s_^\$_REMOVETHISLINE_g | grep -v "REMOVETHISLINE" |uniq >a24_0_5.txt
>
> and I ll past below the second
Yes! I changed sbim to sbin and the kernel installed. So, what package
does kernel-img.conf come with? That is the package that has the bug.
Thanks!
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 15:47 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 08:09:40PM -0500, Brent S. Elmer, Ph.D. wrote:
> > The provided p
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 05:08:24PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > 10|852 /tset/LSB.os/mfiles/msync_P/T.msync_P 22:58:49|TC Start, scenario
> > ref 858-0
> > FSG internal testing showed that Fedora Core 5's 2.6.18 kernel does not
> > fail in the same way. I believe I've traced it to a backpor
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 08:09:40PM -0500, Brent S. Elmer, Ph.D. wrote:
> The provided postinst hook script [/usr/sbim/update-grub] could not be
> run.
There is most likely a typo in your /etc/kernel-img.conf
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:25:22PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-19 20:30]:
> > why not wait for the fix and backport it?!
>
> Well, have you seen the discussion on lkml in which people are
> basically tapping in the dark? I hope there'll be a c
* maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-19 20:30]:
> why not wait for the fix and backport it?!
Well, have you seen the discussion on lkml in which people are
basically tapping in the dark? I hope there'll be a clean fix
in a few days but...
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 05:17:45PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> found 401384 29
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:17:03PM +, Sven Luther wrote:
> > mkvmlinuz (28) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* Added support for 2.6.19 kernels.
> >* Added portuguese translation. (Closes: #401
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:43:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line works for me
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
* DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre wrote:
> Could not allocate 16 bytes percpu data
2.6.18-2 and newer include a workaround for this problem.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-vserver-k7
Version: 2.6.18-8
Severity: normal
When I run vserver server stop vserver stops all services and after
"unmounting non-root fs" it says:
===
Dec 19 22:10:39 vice kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
virtual add
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 402787 + pending
Bug#402787: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: cciss - cannot access to disks on MSA20
enclosure
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
On remote, I ran:
cat /dev/ttyS1 >>a24_0_5
cat a24_0_5 | tr -d "\000\007" |sed s_^$'\x20'\$_REMOVETHISLINE_g |sed
s_^\$_REMOVETHISLINE_g | grep -v "REMOVETHISLINE" |uniq >a24_0_5.txt
and I ll past below the second file; otherwise, you d have pages or
blank lines.
The system is Debian on Alph
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 05:08:24PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> So it seems that the patches needed for msync() conformance we applied
> from 2.6.19 to our 2.6.18 cause filesystem corruption, see the current
> discussion on this on lkml. From what I understand it, plain 2.6.18
> is not LSB
Package: linux-source-2.6.18
Version: 2.6.18-8
Severity: normal
Hi,
the kernel I use is built from debian source and 2.6.18-8 patches are
applied. The r8169 is on a dlink pci card in a SIS 671 system with a 2.4
GHz P4 CPU.
Symptom: Download speed is ok (25 MB/s) but Upload, e.g. the send speed
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 17:08 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> So it seems that the patches needed for msync() conformance we applied
> from 2.6.19 to our 2.6.18 cause filesystem corruption, see the current
> discussion on this on lkml. From what I understand it, plain 2.6.18
> is not LSB 3.1 confor
女子大生同士が、壮絶！レズシーン！
ディープキス！相互オナニー！迫力ある動画を提供！
http://www1.fgter.com/?bc=wkt15&[EMAIL PROTECTED]
受信拒否
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More info about evbug:
CONFIG_INPUT_EVBUG: │
│ │
│ Say Y here if you have a problem with the input subsystem and │
│ want all events (keypresses, mouse moveme
Please see http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=8457 for help with
stopping that message from logging.
The culprit is evbug and I just stumbled across that via Google (I had
the same messages on my box).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 401384 29
Bug#401384: [INTL:pt] Portuguese translation for mkvmlinuz (debconf)
Bug marked as found in version 29.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
found 401384 29
thanks
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:17:03PM +, Sven Luther wrote:
> mkvmlinuz (28) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Added support for 2.6.19 kernels.
>* Added portuguese translation. (Closes: #401384)
pt.po doesn't actually appear to be in the tarball (I'm looking at
mkvml
On 12/19/06, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Rob Walker wrote:
> Ooops, I accidentally used some bash specific syntax in the first patch. The
> attached patch fixes this and should work now. It also makes sure the right
> option is passed into parse_video_opts
* Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-20 19:17]:
> >From a recent run of the LSB 3.1 tests:
>
> 10|852 /tset/LSB.os/mfiles/msync_P/T.msync_P 22:58:49|TC Start, scenario ref
> 858-0
>
> FSG internal testing showed that Fedora Core 5's 2.6.18 kernel does not
> fail in the same way. I believ
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Rob Walker wrote:
> Ooops, I accidentally used some bash specific syntax in the first patch. The
> attached patch fixes this and should work now. It also makes sure the right
> option is passed into parse_video_opts (was $TMP, should be $x)
applied for 0.85e
thanks a lot
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Rob Walker wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.85c
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> The framebuffer script
> (/usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-top/framebuffer) assumes that the
> name of the option on the command line is the same as the name of the modul
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:16:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403630: installationreport etch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:06:21PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Is there some easy way I can reproduce this? Format a disk with LUKS
> on one PC, connect it to the slug and do what exactly to trigger the
> corruption?
> --
> Martin Michlmayr
> http://www.cyrius.com/
Backup the header of the
Frans Pop schrieb:
> reassign 403630 linux-2.6
> retitle 403630 Hangs while detecting CD-ROM devices
> thanks
>> After install I update the
>> Kernel, but get problems booting it. It allways stop at detecting the
>> cdrom-devices. (Kernel 2.6.18-3-k7 and 2.6.18-3-486). With the working
>> kernel 2
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/broken-out/alpha-increase-percpu_enough_room.patch
It's on my TODO list for this weekend.
This patch gets us back to the Relocation overflow problem, which was
also
30 matches
Mail list logo
