Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote: Hello, I would like to reschedule the uploads: Unless someone objects, we will upload both linux-2.6.16 and linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow, 20th of June. - linux-2.6 2.6.17-1 is what we have in dists/trunk/linux-2.6 now. - linux-2.6.16 2.6.16-15

Bug#357236: linux-image-2.6.16-rc5-686: no sound on Lifebook P2120

2006-06-19 Thread Adam C Powell IV
reassign 357236 linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 forwarded 357236 https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1943 thanks Hadn't noticed that the forward tag didn't work last time, sorry about that. Okay, it's been three months and upstream hasn't touched my bug. I'm wondering if I can get so

Processed: Re: Bug#357236: linux-image-2.6.16-rc5-686: no sound on Lifebook P2120

2006-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 357236 linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 Bug#357236: linux-image-2.6.16-rc5-686: no sound on Lifebook P2120 Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `linux-image-2.6.16-2-686'. > forwarded 357236 https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id

Bug#374545: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686: Sound recording fails with DSP-500 / snd-usb-audio

2006-06-19 Thread David Vuorio
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 Version: 2.6.16-14 Severity: normal Using linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 on my laptop, sound recording fails using the Plantronics DSP-500 USB headset. (Output is fine.) Changing only the kernel to 2.6.15-1-486, it works (both on my laptop and on my Etch system). This

Re: Bug#374278: Install report: 12" PowerBook G4 1.33Ghz

2006-06-19 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:26:18PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 09:18:39PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Nothing else, the yaboot.conf built with the installer. > > Ah, sorry, this is the already installed system, you are not trying to boot > the d-i image, right ? Ye

Bug#367125: ext2_get_inode: bad inode number

2006-06-19 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
"Peter Kruse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello Goswin, > > > On 6/16/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed this and can reproduce it by running exportfs -u, > umount, > resize2fs, mount, exportfs and then accessing some previously used > file o

Bug#372523: linux-image-2.6.16-2-xen-686: kernel panic on software raid (md0)

2006-06-19 Thread FRLinux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 19 June 2006 18:23, FRLinux wrote: >> The IDE controller seems to be a secondary controller from the looks of >> it therefore explaining that devices are being *moved* to hde and hdg. > > The question is: what is being see

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 06:56:50PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I > > think rough consensus was to leave the metapackages as-is in > > linux-2.6.16 and either 1) dr

linux-image-2.6.12-1-386

2006-06-19 Thread Dennis C. Josifovich
Hello All; I have "debian testing" installed on an old dell machine. It has linux-image-2.6.12-1-386 on it and since I was having trouble iptables, I was checking to see if there was an update. There appears to be packages for linux-image-2.6.15-1-* (486, 686, etc.) but there is nothing fo

Bug#372523: linux-image-2.6.16-2-xen-686: kernel panic on software raid (md0)

2006-06-19 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 19 June 2006 18:23, FRLinux wrote: > The IDE controller seems to be a secondary controller from the looks of > it therefore explaining that devices are being *moved* to hde and hdg. The question is: what is being seen as the primary IDE controller in this case (which claims hda-hdd). T

Re: I was banned from #debian-kernel ? ...

2006-06-19 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 06:26:36PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to know why i was banned from #debian-kernel and by whom, > > By waldi, because your client disconnected/connected continuously for > several hours. Ah, ok. Can i be allowed back

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread Joey Hess
Joey Hess wrote: > Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > > The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I > > > think rough consensus was to leave the metapackages as-is in > > > linux-2.6.16 and either 1) drop meta package

Re: I was banned from #debian-kernel ? ...

2006-06-19 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Sven Luther wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to know why i was banned from #debian-kernel and by whom, By waldi, because your client disconnected/connected continuously for several hours. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

I was banned from #debian-kernel ? ...

2006-06-19 Thread Sven Luther
Hi all, I would like to know why i was banned from #debian-kernel and by whom, and if this was a decision taken by all of the debian kernel team, and if so, why i was not informed on it, and what the plan is now ? Troubled, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 15:28:29 -0700 (PDT) Jurij Smakov wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > Linux 2.6.17 has been released today, and I would like to upload it > > to unstable tomorrow (Monday 19.06). > > http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel/pool/main/l/linux-

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread Joey Hess
Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I > > think rough consensus was to leave the metapackages as-is in > > linux-2.6.16 and either 1) drop meta packages from linux-2.6 >= 2.6.17

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I > think rough consensus was to leave the metapackages as-is in > linux-2.6.16 and either 1) drop meta packages from linux-2.6 >= 2.6.17 > or 2) create separate metap

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 01:59:29PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to reschedule the uploads: > > Unless someone objects, we will upload both linux-2.6.16 and linux-2.6 > to unstable tomorrow, 20th of June. > > - linux-2.6 2.6.17-1 is what we have in dists/trunk/linux-2

Bug#372523: linux-image-2.6.16-2-xen-686: kernel panic on software raid (md0)

2006-06-19 Thread FRLinux
Hello, I actually found what the problem is, and i wonder if it is related to your kernel settings. When i perform an install of Debian, the installer sees two IDE drives as hda and hdc (they are indeed connected as primary and secondary master) and a CDrom drive. When your Xen kernel boots, it t

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-19 15:18]: > mipsel was broken by a kernel-package change, which should have been > fixed too by now. For the record, kernel-package didn't change. The kernel package introduced new functionality which relied on a feature kernel-package didn't yet

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-19 14:34]: > On Monday 19 June 2006 13:59, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > - linux-2.6.16 2.6.16-15 is what we have in dists/sid/linux-2.6 now, > > Will this fix the build problems for both hppa and mipsel? mipsel should build with the new kernel-package (10.

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:34:39PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 19 June 2006 13:59, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > - linux-2.6.16 2.6.16-15 is what we have in dists/sid/linux-2.6 now, > > Will this fix the build problems for both hppa and mipsel? > What about the RC bugs that have also been k

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hi, On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:34:39PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > Will this fix the build problems for both hppa and mipsel? > What about the RC bugs that have also been keeping 2.6.16 out of testing? hppa seems fixed in svn. mipsel was broken by a kernel-package change, which should have been fix

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 19 June 2006 13:59, Frederik Schueler wrote: > - linux-2.6.16 2.6.16-15 is what we have in dists/sid/linux-2.6 now, Will this fix the build problems for both hppa and mipsel? What about the RC bugs that have also been keeping 2.6.16 out of testing? pgp4U7f1aBAOa.pgp Description: PGP si

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hello, I would like to reschedule the uploads: Unless someone objects, we will upload both linux-2.6.16 and linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow, 20th of June. - linux-2.6 2.6.17-1 is what we have in dists/trunk/linux-2.6 now. - linux-2.6.16 2.6.16-15 is what we have in dists/sid/linux-2.6 now, Bas

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 18 June 2006 23:58, Frederik Schueler wrote: > The problem is: we need a kernel >> 2.6.15 in testing ASAP (2.6.15 is > really old, and d-i needs a new kernel for the next release candidate). That is correct. Now that the testing archive for amd64 is complete (for the purposed of new ins

Processed: really adjust severity

2006-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 374378 important Bug#374378: initramfs-tools: Fails to initialize LVM if pvmove was ran without completing Severity set to `important' from `critical' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Bug#367125: ext2_get_inode: bad inode number

2006-06-19 Thread Peter Kruse
Hello Goswin,On 6/16/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Did you reboot the nfs server while clients had the fs mounted? Orstoped the nfsd and run fsck or a resize? Anything that could change the inode numbers without the clients getting any notice?Yes, we rebooted and recreated the

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-1

2006-06-19 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:12:06AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:44:01PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > Yeah, istr having an issue like that as well. We should probably keep the > > 2.6.16 compiler hardcoded to whatever is the default in etch when we > > upload (its stil