I take issue with this because we [the xen team] have never excluded
anyone and have tried to get all those people interested in solid Debian
packages of xen to come forth and help. I spent a good amount of time
before actually forming the Alioth project attempting to get in touch
with peop
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:59:17AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > as the xen userspace is tightly integrated to the xen kernel,
> > it makes a lot of sense to release both in the same run.
>
> But it doesn't make sense to release them both as
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:42:15AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > could you please test the latest images in experimental?
> > linux-2.6.16-rc4 has a changeset that should fix your testcase.
>
> There is no 2.6.16-rcX in experimental yet. But he ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This is probably of little urgency and priority but should be a
good idea to have it right. :-) I don't know if debian-kernel is the
right list to point this out, maybe if you want I can report a bug
against kernel package.
Check
On 28/02/06, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Mario Gonzalez wrote:
>
> > > you are referring to the depedency loop see #349354
> > >
> >Yes, that's the main problem. However...
>
> ok as you are running your own kernel, you escaped that loop, try:
>
> apt-get
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> tags 352738 pending
Bug#352738: initramfs-tools: url to source in copyright file out of date
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Mario Gonzalez wrote:
> > you are referring to the depedency loop see #349354
> >
>Yes, that's the main problem. However...
ok as you are running your own kernel, you escaped that loop, try:
apt-get udate
apt-get install udev
apt-get install linux-image-2.6-XXX # where X
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> tags 354708 pending
Bug#354708: cpio: ./sbin/vgchange: No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:29:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Hi,
> I guess that if people are able to find a kernel source tree outside of
> debian, they are perfectly capable of downloading and applying a patch too.
>
> Just include an URL to wherever such a patch is in the README.Debian of the
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Those drivers depend on the BROKEN_ON_SMP option set, which obviously is
>> not set on SMP kernels.
>
> No, this CAPI drivers are not broken in this respect, only i4l.
So they can be re-enabled ? (not having the 2.6.15 sources at hand to
check right now
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:43:39AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:24:49PM -0700, J. William Campbell wrote:
> > This bug can easily be produced by creating a zero-length file on the
> > Windows XP system. Attempting to copy this empty file from XP to the
> > Linux system
> > wil
FYI: The status of the linux-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.6.15-4
Current version: 2.6.15-7
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:20:34PM +0100, giorgio wrote:
>
> I have 2 kernels to choose from grub at boot: 2.6.12 and 2.6.15
> 2.6.12 works but 2.6.15 does not.
> If I try to boot 2.6.15 it give me a lot of errors like:
>
>
> udevd-event []:run_program:exec of program /lib/udev/usb_id failed
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:57:26PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Those drivers depend on the BROKEN_ON_SMP option set, which obviously is
> not set on SMP kernels.
No, this CAPI drivers are not broken in this respect, only i4l.
Bastian
--
Extreme feminine beauty is always disturbing.
On 28/02/06, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tags 354573 moreinfo
> stop
>
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Mario Gonzalez wrote:
>
> > I've got kernel 2.6.14 compiled by myself y when I did an
> > dist-upgrade I couldn't install this package. I saw this error
>
> we have linu-image 2.6.15 s
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:47:43PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You didn't remember you didn't write anything in reply though.
>
> Ah, obvious proof of complete neglect of the yaird package, of course.
The bug is unfixed since 75 days, with a patch s
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:28:01PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> It looks like there are some discrepancies between the kernel config for
> up/smp kernels.
> Is there a reason why the AVM modules aren't built in the SMP kernels ? The
> same goes for the Eicon drivers which aren't enabled in
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:17:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Hi,
> > I can.
>
> :)
>
> Guido, be warned that Bastian often communicates with a few monosylabes and
> SVN commits :) This doesn't make working with him too problematic usually
> though :)
>
We've been a bit more chatty, for now, b
Package: linux-doc-2.6.15
Severity: minor
Hello,
There is a minor typo in the package description.
"varios" should be "various".
Kind Regards,
--
Nekral
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:28:01PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> It looks like there are some discrepancies between the kernel config for
> up/smp kernels.
>
> According to pdo.debian.net:
>
> lib/modules/2.6.15-1-486/kernel/drivers/isdn/hardwar
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:13:14 +0100
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, you said "there is no problem, it works just fine on my
> powerbook".
Sure. Completely out of any context, of course.
> > And yes, I did look at that bugreport (including the patch) before
> > Erkelenz.
>
> You did
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:22:03PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:08:04 +0100
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:51:32PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:56:41 +0100
> > > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 354708 initramfs-tools
Bug#354708: cpio: ./sbin/vgchange: No such file or directory
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `initramfs-tools'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
Hi,
It looks like there are some discrepancies between the kernel config for
up/smp kernels.
According to pdo.debian.net:
lib/modules/2.6.15-1-486/kernel/drivers/isdn/hardware/avm/c4.ko
base/linux-image-2.6.15-1-486
lib/modules/2.6.15-1-686/kernel/drivers/is
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:08:04 +0100
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:51:32PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:56:41 +0100
> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > he clearly decided that anything i may say is just to be ignor
Ciao to everyone!
I'm using Debian testing (etch) with this sources.list:
deb ftp://ftp.it.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
deb-src ftp://ftp.it.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ etch main
deb http://secure-testing.debian
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:02:34PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:25:57AM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:15:39AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > The current package from pkg-xen is not releasable.
> > Then why don't you just join and commit yo
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:47:51PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:43:02 +0100
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > he basically said : it doesn't break on my powerbook, so i don't care,
>
> I sincerely hope noone takes stries like the above serious. :-)
Ok, you
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:51:32PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> [sending to list rather than through BTS]
>
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:56:41 +0100
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > he clearly decided that anything i may say is just to be ignored
>
> Funny this should come from you
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:25:57AM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:15:39AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The current package from pkg-xen is not releasable.
> Then why don't you just join and commit your fixes before anybody tried to
> release it?
I can.
Bastian
--
Fa
[sending to list rather than through BTS]
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:56:41 +0100
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> he clearly decided that anything i may say is just to be ignored
Funny this should come from you.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 4
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:43:02 +0100
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> he basically said : it doesn't break on my powerbook, so i don't care,
I sincerely hope noone takes stries like the above serious. :-)
No, non-breakage on my laptop had nothing to do with it. If my
powerpc-laptop had req
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:17:36AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > Please have a look at the patch, and show me how it is broken.
>
> Of course I've looked at the patch, that's how I came to the conclusion
> it's broken. Please don't jump to conclusions. Your patch makes the
> assumption that ide
What about you all stop Cc'ing this non-relevant bug? Thank you...
(FWIW my opinion is that yaird should not be the default because hardware
changes will make the system unbootable if the drivers needed to mount /
are not in the initramfs.)
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital si
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 08:54:39PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> >I am still interested in opinions from _other_ members of the kernel
> >team: Is it decided to decided to ditch yaird due to my irresponsible
> >or non-cooperative behaviour (which I c
This one time, at band camp, friendly Sven Luther said:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:17:39AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, friendly Sven Luther said:
> >
> > [ a long unfriendly rant snipped ]
> >
> > Frankly, I don't care whether or not yaird is the default ramdisk
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:17:39AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, friendly Sven Luther said:
>
> [ a long unfriendly rant snipped ]
>
> Frankly, I don't care whether or not yaird is the default ramdisk
> generator for the kernel. An MIA upstream is a good reason to dec
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:15:39AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi,
> The current package from pkg-xen is not releasable.
>
Then why don't you just join and commit your fixes before anybody tried to
release it?
Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
This one time, at band camp, friendly Sven Luther said:
[ a long unfriendly rant snipped ]
Frankly, I don't care whether or not yaird is the default ramdisk
generator for the kernel. An MIA upstream is a good reason to decide
against it, in fact. The entire rest of your argument sounds like hur
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:42:15AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> could you please test the latest images in experimental?
> linux-2.6.16-rc4 has a changeset that should fix your testcase.
There is no 2.6.16-rcX in experimental yet. But he can get them from the
snapshots:
deb http://kernel-arc
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 08:46:49PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, friendly Sven Luther said:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:43:17PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:14:02 +0100 Sven Luther
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > #34342
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:59:17AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Guido Trotter wrote:
> > Absolutely true! The current xen team is fully agrees on this position!
> xen 3.0 is out since the 6th of december!
> so it has seen considerable amount of production use since.
> as
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:59:17AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> as the xen userspace is tightly integrated to the xen kernel,
> it makes a lot of sense to release both in the same run.
I hear that the kernel team don't want to maintain userspace tools.
> the debian kernel team has always bee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 354573 moreinfo
Bug#354573: initramfs-tools: Problems with kernel version
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:15:35PM +0900, Gustaf Räntilä wrote:
>
> You seem to have problems with something called yaird, whatever that is.
opening a bug report against it might be better,
than posting to a random bug.
> My problem is that the udev package needs kernel modules
> in /lib/modules
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Guido Trotter wrote:
>
> Absolutely true! The current xen team is fully agrees on this position!
>
> Guido
xen 3.0 is out since the 6th of december!
so it has seen considerable amount of production use since.
as the xen userspace is tightly integrated to the xen kernel,
it
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:59:17AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> xen 3.0 is out since the 6th of december!
> so it has seen considerable amount of production use since.
> as the xen userspace is tightly integrated to the xen kernel,
> it makes a lot of sense to release both in the same run.
Th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> tags 354334 moreinfo
Bug#354334: udev removal should remake initrd
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
tags 354573 moreinfo
stop
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Mario Gonzalez wrote:
> I've got kernel 2.6.14 compiled by myself y when I did an
> dist-upgrade I couldn't install this package. I saw this error
we have linu-image 2.6.15 since long in unstable and currently
also up2date in testing.
you are ref
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:02.0[A] -> Link [LNKU] -> GSI 11 (level, low) ->
> IRQ 11
> ohci_hcd :00:02.0: OHCI Host Controller
> ohci_hcd :00:02.0: USB HC takeover failed! (BIOS/SMM bug)
> ohci_hcd :00:02.0: can't reset
> ACPI: PCI interrupt f
50 matches
Mail list logo
