On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:22:03PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:08:04 +0100 > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:51:32PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:56:41 +0100 > > > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > he clearly decided that anything i may say is just to be ignored > > > > > > Funny this should come from you. > > > > Did you not say that because it was i that said that there is need > > for the ide-generic module on powerpc and i didn't forsee any such > > need arising in the future, that it was not thrustable, when we > > disucssed this in Erkelenz ? > > In Erkelenz I finally lost interest in discussing with you when I got > the impression that any argument of mine was just to be ignored.
And remember what you replied when i proposed that we go over the patch and problem, and try to implement a fix, or convince ourselves that it was the right thing to do ? I mean your only argument was that you where not sure it would not break, that you would or could do nothing without feedback from your upstream, and refused to even consider investigating the problem with me there or at some other time. > No, I am not trying to start a new debate here. Just posting my side of > your story about Erkelenz. Misrepresentation though, since you don't say what arguments you used. And yes, we lost already 10 times more time than what it would have taken to fix it, but you prefered to polemic in erkelenz, instead of fixing the bug. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
