On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:40:04PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi,
> FWIW, the policy on kernel patches for sarge was that if it didn't apply to
> the kernel sources we shipped, it didn't need to be included as a package in
> stable. We're obviously not shipping a 2.6.12 kernel for etch, so I
>
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:34:44PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi,
> > Yeah, it's a sort of kernel, but it's not the linux kernel... And it seems
> > the
> > kernel team is about the linux kernel, not just any kernel, isn't it?
>
> The dom0 kernel is a Linux kernel built for the Xen hypervisor
Good day to you, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After a review of all your data, we are pleased to notify you of
your approval.
Please submit your details to continue
http://ca.geocities.com/louisa99218esdras71847/
See you later,
Julius
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 354217 linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp
Bug#354217: DEVPTS_FS not present at linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-sm'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-sm' to
`linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:22:23PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> > The debian kernel team will maintain xen images with the linux-2.6
> > source. I currently prepare both xen 3.0 and unstable packages, which
> > can be hopefully uploaded today. Maintainer will be the kernel team, as
> > there are
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:32:10PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > It is a sort of kernel.
> Yeah, it's a sort of kernel, but it's not the linux kernel... And it seems the
> kernel team is about the linux kernel, not just any kernel
Hello,
I am sorry things have rushed today, things which should have better been
discussed by all concerned persons, _before_.
We have been tracking xen support in the linux-2.6 source package as an
item on the todo list for 2.6.16 since a week or two, but we have not yet
discussed the details
Hello,
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 12:05:28AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > disable_timer_pin_1
>
> Can you be a little more specific? I've been pulling my hair over this, we
> have a bunch of (different) AMD64 boxes, and only the one I got has this
> problem, and I could not fix it with nt
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:06:09PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:00:49PM +0100, Dietmar Sieger wrote:
> > Any hint what to do, or where to search?
>
> known problem related due to broken hardware.
>
> Try the following boot parameter:
>
> disable_timer
Package: kernel-image-2.6-686
Version: 1:2.6.15-4
Severity: important
Running Debian Testing:
Kernel: kernel-image-2.6-686 2.6.15-4
On startup, I get a kernel NULL pointer dereference error, and the same
error on shutdown (reboot). On shutdown however it is immediately
followed by a se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:09:29 -0800
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:24:55PM -0500, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> > Is there any drawback to just switching the default dependency to
> > be on yaird instead of initramfs-to
hysler pat,
You have been accepted to inherit a transcript in any field of your choice.
Please call and leave your NAME and a PHONE NUMBER you can be reached :
509.356.0595
emily
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:24:55PM -0500, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> Is there any drawback to just switching the default dependency to be on
> yaird instead of initramfs-tools?
Yes. You can't install yaird on upgrade from a 2.4 kernel.
And currently, you can't install initramfs-tools on upgrade from
Is there any drawback to just switching the default dependency to be on
yaird instead of initramfs-tools?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:04:03 +0100
Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I think xen would be better served having its own
> committed team, repository, etc, is that it would be easier for
> anyone interested in xen to follow just mailing lists dedicated to it
> and its repository
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:00:49PM +0100, Dietmar Sieger wrote:
>> Any hint what to do, or where to search?
>
> known problem related due to broken hardware.
>
> Try the following boot parameter:
>
> disable_timer_pin_1
>
>
> Best regards
> Frederik Schu
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:00:49PM +0100, Dietmar Sieger wrote:
> Any hint what to do, or where to search?
known problem related due to broken hardware.
Try the following boot parameter:
disable_timer_pin_1
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Description: Digita
Hello,
i have the problem that the (linux-)time on my machine runs two times faster
then the real time.
It is not a problem off the real time clock.
It looks like, that the calculation ticks vs. seconds goes wrong.
I tried some changes around (USER_HZ, HZ, adjtime) but do not found the
right pl
One can imagine my surprise this morning after checking my mail
before leaving work and having nothing, to arriving at work and finding
a huge thread crossing the pkg-xen-devel, debian-devel and debian-kernel
lists regarding Xen. I, and most of the people on the pkg-xen Alioth
project have spe
Rejected: linux-2.6_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc4-0experimental.1.dsc refers to
linux-2.6_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc4.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in
the pool.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUB
linux-2.6_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc4-0experimental.1_powerpc.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc4-0experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc4-0experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.16_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc4-0experimental.1_all.deb
linux-manual-2
Dear all,
I posted to debian-french and debian-laptop, without
finding a solution for the following problem. Neither a google search helps.
I had two vfat crashes, rather similar:
Two machines (laptops) with debian, dual boot windows xp:
- machine1: sarge, kernel: 2.6.8-1-686, ide disk 30GB
-
Rejected: linux-2.6_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc4-0experimental.1.dsc: syntax error on line
18.
Rejected: linux-2.6_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc4-0experimental.1.dsc: no Files: field.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSU
linux-2.6_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc4-0experimental.1_powerpc.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc4-0experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc4-0experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.16_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc4-0experimental.1_all.deb
linux-manual-2
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi,
> It is a sort of kernel.
Yeah, it's a sort of kernel, but it's not the linux kernel... And it seems the
kernel team is about the linux kernel, not just any kernel, isn't it?
> Just to say, how connected xen to linux is:
>
> Fo
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I won't reject the help of volunteers but I strongly think that the
> kernel team needs to have its hands on them.
How many members of the kernel team are planning to do active work on
Xen, kernel and userspace?
Greetings
Marc
--
(new) libxen3.0-dev_3.0.1-1_i386.deb extra libdevel
development files for the control library for XEN
Users wishing to develop their own tools for interfaces to the underlying
XEN kernel should install this package.
(new) libxen3.0-python_3.0.1-1_i386.deb extra python
python wrapper around libxc,
xen-3.0_3.0.1-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xen-3.0_3.0.1-1.dsc
xen-3.0_3.0.1.orig.tar.gz
xen-3.0_3.0.1-1.diff.gz
xen-hypervisor-3.0-amd64_3.0.1-1_i386.deb
xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386_3.0.1-1_i386.deb
xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386-pae_3.0.1-1_i386.deb
x
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 01:16:32PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> The modules built from thinkpad-source require the inter_module_* functions.
And what is the problem with fixing the modules?
Bastian
--
You can't evaluate a man by logic alone.
-- McCoy, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:56:35PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> On the other hand Xen is not the
> kernel, so isn't it better if there is a team for it, even if strongly
> connected
> with the kernel one?
It is a sort of kernel. And no, I don't think i
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:41:53PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
Hi,
> I agree. I just would like to ask that, please, don't disband just because of
> disagreement with the kernel team, but try to cooperate anyway.
>
I don't think we want to! And I hope there is no disagreement (we still don't
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:54:24PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for
dom0 only ?).
No. The kernel team will maintain xen (in variants 3.0 and unstable).
Bastian, as far as I know, you
On Friday, 24 February 2006 17:34, Guido Trotter wrote:
> Yes, we could, of course... But on the other hand I believe that the xen
> hypervisor and userspace tools are actually different from the linux kernel
> (as they support multiple kernels and operating systems), even though the
> linux kernel
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
Hi,
> Well, if the kernel team answers "left to the kernel team" and you close the
> alioth project, I guess you can always move into the kernel team ;)
>
Yes, we could, of course... But on the other hand I believe that the xen
h
On Friday, 24 February 2006 16:56, Guido Trotter wrote:
> So... what do you think we can do now? Can we join our efforts on xen or
> you strongly think it should be left to the kernel team, and we should just
> close the alioth project?
Well, if the kernel team answers "left to the kernel team" and
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:05:33PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> No. The kernel team will maintain xen (in variants 3.0 and unstable).
Okay, I misunderstood.
You will maintain userland tools too ?
Is you work is already finished and available somewhere ?
Right, I am juste a little disapointed. :)
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:54:24PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for
> dom0 only ?).
No. The kernel team will maintain xen (in variants 3.0 and unstable).
Bastian
--
Vulcans worship peace above all.
-- McCoy, "Re
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:54:24PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
Hi,
> As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for
> dom0 only ?).
Actually I think he meant the hypervisors too... Anyway I also think that if the
kernel team is going to maintain the kernel images there sh
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:37:56PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi,
> > This is great! In the meantime we are working on uploading xen 3.0 to
> > unstable,
> > and our packages I think are almost ready too!
>
> This is insufficient. Either maintain both 3.0 and unstable or none. In
> the meantim
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:37:56PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> This is insufficient. Either maintain both 3.0 and unstable or none. In
> the meantime, the kernel team will maintain both.
As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for
dom0 only ?).
We just have to duplicat
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7
Version: 2.6.15-4
Severity: important
The problem affects also 2.6.15-1-486 and the 2.6.8-386 from sarge !!!
if i try to set dma with hdparm -d1 it says:
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
even giving as boot options no success.
the HW however is fine s
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:22:23PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> This is great! In the meantime we are working on uploading xen 3.0 to
> unstable,
> and our packages I think are almost ready too!
This is insufficient. Either maintain both 3.0 and unstable or none. In
the meantime, the kernel team
Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi!
> The debian kernel team will maintain xen images with the linux-2.6
> source. I currently prepare both xen 3.0 and unstable packages, which
> can be hopefully uploaded today. Maintainer will be the kernel team, as
> there are heavy dependencies between xen and the kernel
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:01:04AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 09:16:27PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > > Does this driver work for you if you boot with the "linux26" option?
> >
> > The 2.6 kernel hangs during the boot process, so I don't know.
>
> Did you file a bug repor
Hi,
On Monday 20 February 2006 23:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > please add a section about what we like to have in an bug report:
[...]
> Suggestion: Have the kernel packages install BTS files
> below /usr/share/bug and simply recommend using a bug
The modules built from thinkpad-source require the inter_module_* functions.
These have been deprecated but have been available throughout the Linux 2.6
series. As of 2.6.16 they are only available if CONFIG_OBSOLETE_INTERMODULE
is set. I would like to ask now that CONFIG_OBSOLETE_INTERMODULE be
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:47:28AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > - Add smp alternatives patch[1] from akpm tree (this may be merged
> > anyway in the next time), and remove UP flavours in favour.
>
> Do we know about the cave-ats of this ? What is the status of the merge of
> this feature ? does
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:02:57PM +1300, Matthew Grant wrote:
> I am a Debian Maintainer who is seriously considering getting Xen into
> Debian and Ubuntu.
The debian kernel team will maintain xen images with the linux-2.6
source. I currently prepare both xen 3.0 and unstable packages, which
can
Package: kernel-source-2.2.25
Version: 2.2.25-4
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
== making target debian/stamp-kernel-conf [new prereqs: .config
Makefile]==
/usr/bin/makeARCH=i386 \
oldconfig
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/kernel-source-2.2.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 09:16:27PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > Does this driver work for you if you boot with the "linux26" option?
>
> The 2.6 kernel hangs during the boot process, so I don't know.
Did you file a bug report about this, and this is the stable sareg 2.6.8
kernel, right ?
Do you
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 07:09:59PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:27:06AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > As discussed I update trunk to rc4. The following changes will be done
> > next:
> > - vserver,
>
> Done for i386, amd64 and powerpc. It works really good.
>
> > - l
51 matches
Mail list logo
