On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 11:09:39PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 06 February 2006 22:25, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > architecture.mk convert the architecture name in case the name in
> > > Debian and the name in the kernel tree is different, which is the
> > > case for powerpc (ppc), and hp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 351709 linux-2.6
Bug#351709: udev: usb mass-storgae does not work at all
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
reassign 351709 linux-2.6
thanks
On Feb 06, Jan Christoph Uhde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first time i plug an UMS device into my computer the syslog
> following messages:
Apparently udev loaded all the drivers you need, so it's out of the
picture.
So if your device is not broken, as far as
Frans Pop a écrit :
On Monday 06 February 2006 22:25, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
architecture.mk convert the architecture name in case the name in
Debian and the name in the kernel tree is different, which is the
case for powerpc (ppc), and hppa (parisc).
Manoj, maybe you can take a look at the
On Monday 06 February 2006 22:25, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > architecture.mk convert the architecture name in case the name in
> > Debian and the name in the kernel tree is different, which is the
> > case for powerpc (ppc), and hppa (parisc).
>
> Manoj, maybe you can take a look at the build fail
Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
Package: mips-tools
Version: 2.4.27-11.040815-2
Severity: serious
mips-tools doesn't build on powerpc and hppa; probably a bug in
kernel-package or something -- needs more investigation.
Yes, it is a bug in kernel-package, architecture.mk is not included. It
is inc
* Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-06 22:18]:
> >mips-tools doesn't build on powerpc and hppa; probably a bug in
> >kernel-package or something -- needs more investigation.
>
> Yes, it is a bug in kernel-package, architecture.mk is not included. It
> is included in local-vars.mk, but i
This one time, at band camp, Moritz Muehlenhoff said:
> Stephen Gran wrote:
> > Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
> > Version: 2.6.8-16sarge1
> > Severity: critical
> > Tags: security
> >
> > Please see the discussions here:
> > http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-3858
> > and here:
> > http:/
Stephen Gran wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
> Version: 2.6.8-16sarge1
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
>
> Please see the discussions here:
> http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-3858
> and here:
> http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-3848
This is already included in t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 351685 linux-2.6
Bug#351685: udev storm: pcmcia CF adapter device file constantly deleted,
recreated
Bug reassigned from package `pcmciautils' to `linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Package: mips-tools
Version: 2.4.27-11.040815-2
Severity: serious
mips-tools doesn't build on powerpc and hppa; probably a bug in
kernel-package or something -- needs more investigation.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable
reassign 351685 linux-2.6
thanks
Hi,
Joey Hess:
> I inserted a pcmcia CF adapter containing a partition with a FAT filesystem
> and tried to mount it, but /dev/hde1 was not there, though /dev/hde was.
> I eventually realised that hde1 was being constantly deleted and
> recreated over and over.
I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 351686 linux-2.6
Bug#351686: kernel trouble when rsyncing big file onto vfat - filesystem
Warning: Unknown package 'not'
Warning: Unknown package 'sure..'
Warning: Unknown package 'could'
Warning: Unknown package 'be'
Warning: Unknown package '
Package: rsync (?) not sure.. could
be kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp, too
Version:
---%<---
$ aptitude show rsync
[...]
Version: 2.6.5-1
[...]
$ aptitude show kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
[...]
Version: 2.6.8-16
[...]
---%<---
This is what I find when rsyncing big
files (500MB - 2GB) onto a fat
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.15-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.15-4_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6-atari_2.6.15-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-atari_2.6.15-4_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6-bvme6000_2.6.15-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linu
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-i386
Severity: normal
The Debian Sarge kernel dosn't recognize new e1000 type cards. There are
two IDs missing in the file e1000_hw.h.
(/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/e1000/e100_hw.h)
Here are the two missing IDs:
> #define E1000_DEV_ID_82541GI_LF 0x107C
> #def
Since I updated to latest udev (testing) and
linux-image-2.6.15-1-alpha-generic version 2.6.15-3 (will try
2.6.15-4 next time I reboot this machine) it seems to work without
errors. In upstream 2.6.15.1/.2 were a lot of changes to netlink
code, so it could be that it was a kernel bug that only
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Please see the discussions here:
http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-3858
and here:
http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-3848
Ubuntu already has patches for this, so it may be easiest to pull f
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
Version: 2.6.15-4
Followup-For: Bug #346273
Hi there.
I'm still having errors with latest kernel installed:
==quote from dmesg==
eth0: RealTek RTL8139 at 0x1000, 00:80:48:2f:f4:fc, IRQ 9
eth0: Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8100B/8139D'
pnp: Device 01:01.01 act
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:03:38AM +0900, Horms wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:24:51AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:51:52AM +, Horms wrote:
>> > > Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Oh look, why
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7
Version: 2.6.15-4
Severity: important
The 2.6.15-3 to 2.6.15-4 upgrade breaks reiserfs. Any attempt to unlink
or rename a file results in an "Operation not permitted" error. Creating
and writing to existing files is still works ok.
This is the output from debugre
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:03:38AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:24:51AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:51:52AM +, Horms wrote:
> > > Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Oh look, why are you still fighting about this? It seems t
22 matches
Mail list logo