Bug#337607: marked as done (Boot scripts tries to use not included ?mdrun?)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Jan 2006 01:22:07 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Boot scripts tries to use not included ?mdrun? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

initramfs-tools_0.50c_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: initramfs-tools_0.50c.dsc to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.50c.dsc initramfs-tools_0.50c.tar.gz to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.50c.tar.gz initramfs-tools_0.50c_all.deb to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.50c_all.deb Announcing to debia

Bug#342616: marked as done (initramfs-tools: MODULES=dep doesn't work)

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:02:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342616: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.50c has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#340258: marked as done (initramfs-tools: please remove all evms hooks & scripts from your package)

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:02:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340258: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.50c has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processing of initramfs-tools_0.50c_amd64.changes

initramfs-tools_0.50c_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: initramfs-tools_0.50c.dsc initramfs-tools_0.50c.tar.gz initramfs-tools_0.50c_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Re: non-free firmware

Sven Luther wrote: >No, i don't think this was the kind of framework i was refering to, Well, another related issue is what format the firmware file should be stored in -- I advocate a fixed endianness so it doesn't depend on the host CPU details, for instance. >more of a >set of rules on how w

Bug#67718: Last night

Hey, Thanks for everything. I really appreciate all your help. Mallory -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#348040: linux-source-2.6.15: kernel doesn't run on prep machines

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 11:59:41AM +0100, Sebastian Heutling wrote: > Package: linux-source-2.6.15 > Version: 2.6.15-2 > Severity: normal > > As mentioned on linuxppc-dev by Grant Likely (and me as well) 2.6.15 > doesn't run on prep machines. He also forwarded a possible solution/patch > from Paul

Processed: Re: Bug#347902: initramfs-tools: system fails to boot on sparc64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 347902 klibc Bug#347902: initramfs-tools: system fails to boot on sparc64 Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `klibc'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Bug#347902: initramfs-tools: system fails to boot on sparc64

reassign 347902 klibc stop On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Frans Pop wrote: > With new klibc, latest initramfs-tools and kernel 2.6.15-2, the system > fails to boot. It boots without problems if yaird is used to generate the > initrd. Not sure if this is a klibc problem or initramfs-tools. > > Drivers lo

Bug#347886: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7: Software Suspend: "Unable to find swap device"

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Johannes Rohr wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7 > Version: 2.6.15-1 > Severity: normal > > Hi, I've been trying to use software suspend which is enabled in this > kernel version. Strangely, software suspend complains: > > "unable to find swap device. Try swapon -a"

Bug#316560: Can you confirm this bug is still present in 2.6.15-2 ?

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 10:19:38AM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote: > Le samedi 14 janvier 2006 à 09:25 +0100, Sven Luther a écrit : > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 08:04:30PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote: > > > Mmm, this is a radeonfb bug indeed, it happens if you kill X from the > > console, > > which hap

Bug#348040: linux-source-2.6.15: kernel doesn't run on prep machines

Package: linux-source-2.6.15 Version: 2.6.15-2 Severity: normal As mentioned on linuxppc-dev by Grant Likely (and me as well) 2.6.15 doesn't run on prep machines. He also forwarded a possible solution/patch from Paul Janzen which was send to linuxppc-embedded: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc

Bug#316560: Can you confirm this bug is still present in 2.6.15-2 ?

Le samedi 14 janvier 2006 à 09:25 +0100, Sven Luther a écrit : > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 08:04:30PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote: > Mmm, this is a radeonfb bug indeed, it happens if you kill X from the console, > which happens here. So, can you close this bug report and open a new one about > this o

Bug#343970: Intention to NMU apt-file

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 04:55:17PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Hi > > Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if > you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a > patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. As this ended up on debian

Bug#330225: Can you confirm this is still an issue in 2.6.15-2 ?

On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 06:53:42PM -0500, mike castleman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 12:46:16PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Can you please confirm this is still an issue in out 2.6.15-2 kernels > > currently in unstable ? > > So I was able to find a time when I could install 2.6.15 and reb

Bug#316560: Can you confirm this bug is still present in 2.6.15-2 ?

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 08:04:30PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote: > Le mercredi 11 janvier 2006 à 12:55 +0100, Sven Luther a écrit : > > tags 316560 + moreinfo > > thanks > > Hi Benoit > > > > Can you confirm this bug : > > > > kernel-image-2.6.11-powerpc: Badness in __vunmap with radeon RV250 > >