pat hysler,
We are proud to offer you 537K at a fixed 2.23
jukenyte.com
N.o. - j u k e n y t e . c o m / pathysler
Sincerely,
Joy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 342285 debian-installer
Bug#342285: Debian Installer Sparc
Warning: Unknown package 'debian'
Warning: Unknown package 'installer'
Warning: Unknown package 'sparc'
Warning: Unknown package 'r3.1'
Warning: Unknown package 'sarge'
Warning: Unknown
You may now return to your regularly scheduled dist-upgrades.
elilo (3.4pre5.2-2) fixes the issues with initramfs
linux-2.6 (2.6.14-5) fixes the boot hang bug
klibc is buggy on ia64, so avoid initramfs-tools for now. Use yaird
instead.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 20:38:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line close vlan bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 20:39:33 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line close bug in 2.6.14-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:06:09PM -0500, Rod Ross wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 09:48:27PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
powerpc 2.6.14-2/2.4.27 2.6.12-1/2.4.27 2.6/2.4.27
Fixed, now the config has 2.6.14-
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 06:24:56PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 04:35:23PM +, Paul Brossier wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 07:17:11PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
> > >
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 04:35:23PM +, Paul Brossier wrote:
> hi
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 07:17:11PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
> > it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
> > the various seen timing bugs should be fix
Maximilian Attems wrote:
>>Did I miss the location for updated Kernels? Or is the
>>use of sarge on a internet connected machine not an
>>option any more and one has to use sid or
>>RHEL/Cntos/SLES?
>>Best regards,
>>Mike.
No you haven't missed them, a security update coming from the official
Secu
hi
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 07:17:11PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
> it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
> the various seen timing bugs should be fixed thanks to newer udev.
i could boot a thinkpad on 2.6.14 with an xfs roo
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.11-12
Followup-For: Bug #329319
It's not all that hard to prevent log replay: just don't mount the file
systems! Resume should happen *after* the modules required to access the
swap partition are installed (ide, piix, etc), but *before* the root
partition is mounted.
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005, Andrew Moise wrote:
> I don't know whether this is because of initramfs-tools or udev,
> or both, but when I upgraded them together they hit a spot of trouble:
well looks like you picked a bad combination,
we have a migration from udev files to initramfs-tools
please upgra
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 03:43:01PM +0100, Michael Meyer wrote:
> I would like to set up a kernel with sarge. But I do
> not know if there is a kernel available which has all
> the necessary security fixes?
> The precompiled kernel images of sarge all seem to be
> last updated before
> the release o
hi,
I would like to set up a kernel with sarge. But I do
not know if there is a kernel available which has all
the necessary security fixes?
The precompiled kernel images of sarge all seem to be
last updated before
the release of sarge. The same goes with the
kernel-source (both 2.4.27
and 2.6.8).
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:51:15PM +0100, Matthias Erich Popp wrote:
> Why ist Kernel 2.4.27 the last Debian Kernel
> 2.4.32 can I find on www.kernel.org
the debian 2.4.27 has all the security fixes of 2.4.32
upgrade to 2.6, welcome to the present :)
there has been some activity lately concern
Why ist Kernel 2.4.27 the last Debian Kernel
2.4.32 can I find on www.kernel.org
--
with best regards from Dortmund
Matthias E. Popp
___
Telefon
Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:28:01PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
|
| >
| > Following my other posts: Here is install report from another machine,
| > with exactly the same results. I've tried to reproduce as much debug
| > as I know. Let me know how
As subject says, Close this bug, support present in 0.12
--
ESC:wq
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.11-12
Since kernel version 2.6.8 there are also config option
CRYPTO_AES_586. With version 2.6.13 CRYPTO_AES_X86_64 was added.
So it would be good to add support also to perl/KConfig.pm
Otherwise you have a problem with compiled in support for
CRYPTO_AES_586 and a yai
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:06:09PM -0500, Rod Ross wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 09:48:27PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> >
> >
> >>powerpc 2.6.14-2/2.4.27 2.6.12-1/2.4.27 2.6/2.4.27
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Fixed, now the config has 2.6.14-2, i had added
20 matches
Mail list logo
