Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 20:38:17 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line close vlan bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2005 18:08:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 20 10:08:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from heisenberg.zen.co.uk ([212.23.3.141])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Edtc5-0000cC-VS
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:08:30 -0800
Received: from [62.3.98.42] (helo=localhost.localdomain)
        by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
        id 1Edtc4-0000vf-C8
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:08:28 +0000
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 758C7BAC4EA; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:08:27 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:08:27 +0000
From: Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bond + vlan breakage
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: None at all
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [62.3.98.42]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: linux-2.6
Found: 2.6.14-3
Severity: normal

17:57 < mhy> hi, are there any plans for a 2.6.14-4 upload?  if so, can
you consider 8e3babcd69ec0fde874838e276eb0b211c6a5647
      
(http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=8e3babcd69ec0fde874838e276eb0b211c6a5647)
       for inclusion; it fixes the vlans broken on bonding devices issue
       (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5519)
17:59 < dannf> mhy: probably; mind filing a bug?
18:00 < mhy> dannf: ok, minor severity presumably?
18:01 < dannf> mhy: seems like a reasonable bug - normal is fine

Consider it submitted :-)

Mark

-- 
Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"I never make predictions.  I never have and I never will."
     Tony Blair

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 340068-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 20:38:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 12:38:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from heisenberg.zen.co.uk ([212.23.3.141])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Ekp0V-0004Jo-W7
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:38:20 -0800
Received: from [62.3.98.42] (helo=localhost.localdomain)
        by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
        id 1Ekp0U-00044J-Bo
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:38:18 +0000
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id D0465BAC398; Fri,  9 Dec 2005 20:38:17 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 20:38:17 +0000
From: Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: close vlan bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: None at all
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [62.3.98.42]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Version: 2.6.14-5

This bug was closed in the 2.6.14-5 upload but due to a typo in the
changelog wasn't marked as closed.

-- 
Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"Oh, this is John Reid who is 'Cabinet Bruiser' which just means that he's
 a bit squat, ugly and unpleasant and therefore gets to be called a 'Bruiser'."
     Jeremy Hardy, The News Quiz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to