Hello,
Apparently the initramfs-tools guys are refusing to implement the
--supported-* policy, and as such, the current packages will not allow to use
initramfs-tools, even though i designed it so that there should be no problem.
Well, after it almost came to blow and bad blood with maks about t
Hello, ...
I have upgraded SVN to 2.6.14-rc5, and did a powerpc build. The only
difference was CONFIG_AIRO, and the build completed fine, and i saw that
CONFIG_AIRO was enabled in other arches, so i suppose powerpc was added or
something such, not sure, but in general things will work out fine so
clone 335154 -1 -2
reassign -1 yaird
reassign -2 initramfs-tools
thanks
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 05:09:07AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1
>
> Hello,
>
> This is related to #333003, but I'm filing a separate bug report as
> request
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:41:32AM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
>
> > The situation right now is that a user cannot chose initramfs-tools, which
> is
> > not what i had planed, expecting initramfs-tools to follow the proposal
> > shortly, which is partly a good thing since jonas proposed an even c
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1
Hello,
This is related to #333003, but I'm filing a separate bug report as
requested on irc.
2.6.13-1 had CONFIG_FB_VESA=n, while 2.6.14-rc4 has CONFIG_FB_VESA=y.
Still, the obtained behavior is the same (blank screen), becaus
Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 04:43:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel hardware autodetection fails to detect the SupraExpress
56i Sp Intl
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
> The situation right now is that a user cannot chose initramfs-tools, which
is
> not what i had planed, expecting initramfs-tools to follow the proposal
> shortly, which is partly a good thing since jonas proposed an even cleverer
> method that should satisfy everyone, but it would have still be
As my harddisk is for testing purposes only, I tried to install Ubuntu
Linux 5.10 (which uses a 2.6.12 kernel too) to verify, whether the error
comes on other debian based distributions. Indeed after installing the
base packages the system doesn't boot anymore, showing the same error
messages a
Package: linux-patch-debian-2.6.12
Severity: wishlist
$ apt-cache show linux-patch-debian-2.6.12
Description: Debian patches to version 2.6.12 of the Linux kernel
...
linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12.orig.tar.gz from the Debian archive. . This
I see a " . "
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
tags 333856 - pending
thanks
Jeff and Maximilian, i don't really understand what is happening here, the
plan i proposed on october 9 was sent to d-k as well as to the initramfs-tools
package, and i have seen no comment from you on this, and i even implemented
the solution in the svn repo, and jona
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> On 10/16/05, Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > there will be soon a 2.6.14 in exeperimental, would be cool to check
> > that too before bugging alsa upstream.
>
> I highly doubt this is an alsa-upstream bug. I wrote this driver,
> whi
On Oct 21, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did a bit of a poke around this symbols problem.
> I puzzeled over it for a while. I began to wonder
> if it might be caused byudevsynthesize[1] which seems
> to be the major change between -2 and -4, and I completely
> failed in all my attempts to r
Hello SuperrrLeha,
Thursday, October 20, 2005, 4:21:03 PM, you wrote:
S> How i can update kernel?
I hope that is good steps:
1. download kernel 2.6.12 from http://www.kernel.org or from disk of linuxforum
magazin
2. unpack archive to /usr/src/
3. cd /usr/src/*new_src_kernel*
4. make clean
5. m
* Horms wrote:
> I've put the packages in
> http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6-2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4/
> incase they dissapear from other sources.
The ABI revision in the version number is missing in those packages.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1_powerpc.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1_powerpc.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2
linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1_powerpc.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4.orig.tar.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.14_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc
WE TOLD YOU TO WATCH!!!
IT'S STILL NOT TOO LATE!
TRADING ALERT!!!
Timing is everything!!!
Profits of 200-400% EXPECTED TRADING
COMPANY:China Digital Media Corporation
SYMB0L: CDGT.OB
Opening Price: 1.70
About China Digital Media Corporation
China Digital Media Corpora
On 10/16/05, Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 09:49:10PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
>
>
> ok, for documetentation please post full dmesg of your machine after boot
> and especially the output of lsmod.
there you go:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dmesg
Linux version
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:53:03 +0900
"Simon Horman [Horms]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 06:43:14PM +0900, MAENO Masaki wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:06:23 +0900
> > "Simon Horman [Horms]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 03:39:38PM +0900, MA
Rejected: no source found for linux-2.6 2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1
(linux-headers-2.6.14-rc4-powerpc-smp_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1_powerpc.deb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-2.6 2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1
(kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1_po
Rejected: linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1.dsc refers to
linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in
the pool.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUB
linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1_powerpc.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.14_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-rc4_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-rc4-powerpc_2.6.
linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully
to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.14_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.
After consultation on #debain-kernel, I've uploaded
2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1 for i386 and powerpc to
experimental. I guess they have to go through new now,
but that doesn't take very long these days.
The next move is probably to move the tree to 2.6.14-rc5,
and hopefully 2.6.14 will appea
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 06:43:14PM +0900, MAENO Masaki wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:06:23 +0900
> "Simon Horman [Horms]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 03:39:38PM +0900, MAENO Masaki wrote:
> > > Package: kernel-image
> > > Version: 2.6.8-2
> > > Severity: normal
> >
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:06:23 +0900
"Simon Horman [Horms]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 03:39:38PM +0900, MAENO Masaki wrote:
> > Package: kernel-image
> > Version: 2.6.8-2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > "fsync_bdev()" cannot be executed in issuing "ioctl(BLKFLSBUF)" to dis
I did a bit of a poke around this symbols problem.
I puzzeled over it for a while. I began to wonder
if it might be caused byudevsynthesize[1] which seems
to be the major change between -2 and -4, and I completely
failed in all my attempts to reproduce the problem.
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 334961 kernel-source-2.6.8
Bug#334961: kernel-image: kernel BUG at return value of cciss_ioctl()
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image' to `kernel-source-2.6.8'.
> tag 334961 +sarge
Bug#334961: kerne
28 matches
Mail list logo
