On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:42:26AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 09:49 -0400, micah wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Horms wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:21:38AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > >
> > >>In order to hopefully help kickstart the security update process, I've
> >
I have been experiencing a problem with my SATA hard drive during the
sarge boot sequence. I'm working on a laptop and I have the hard drive,
a 200GB Maxtor DiamondMax 10 (6B200M0), connected to a PCMCIA Silicon
Image Sil 3112 SATALink Controller. My current kernel version is 2.6.8.
The boot sequen
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.13-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.13-1_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.13-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.13-1_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.13-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kern
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 222374 + fixed
Bug number 222374 not found.
> tag 289810 + fixed
Bug#289810: kernel-source-2.6.10: blank screen with static vesafb driver
There were no tags set.
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.10'
Tags added: fixed
> tag 291684 + fixe
tag 222374 + fixed
tag 289810 + fixed
tag 291684 + fixed
tag 304387 + fixed
tag 316809 + fixed
tag 317787 + fixed
tag 320042 + fixed
tag 320366 + fixed
tag 323724 + fixed
tag 328324 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file fo
I'm having a few problems with a SATA hard drive during the sarge
(kernel v 2.6.8) boot sequence. The HD is a 200GB Maxtor DiamondMax10
and it's connected to a PCMCIA SATA adapter (I'm on a laptop and the HD
is on an external housing).
The boot sequence recognizes the HD but it times out during wr
Le jeudi 06 octobre 2005 à 18:07 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
initrd-tool can do either ext2 or cramfs, but not really initramfs, altough i
believe you can override it with the right invocation to cpio used with the
right option of initrd-tools. it defaults to ext2 on 2.4 kernels and cramfs o
Le mercredi 05 octobre 2005 à 12:12 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
Sven Luther wrote:
> Why would it break the beta ? since we should now be using the meta packages
> everywhere, and the 2.6.13 should add no new dependency, the only problem i
> would see is the inclusion of kernel packages in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dann frazier wrote:
>
> I'm up for helping, but might not have much time till next week. I'm
> travelling to the east coast for work, but should have net there. I see
> dilinger was setting you up w/ commit access - do you wanna use a file
> ther
How is it going mate
You'll never guess what happened to me last friday.
Basically found alternative date site that is costless to join.
So many beautiful people are there messaging and meeting eachother.
And offcourse there is someone (or more than one) for you.
Although most of them want one
On 10/6/05, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 17:26 -0400, Larry Lindsey wrote:
> > I've produced a patch against the Debian 2.4.27 sources, which adds
> > ata_piix support (ICH6, ICH7). A lot of Dell machines use this
> > chipset. Its pretty klugey, but I hope its u
Holy crap pal
You'll never guess what happened to me on tuestday.
Basically found
dirty date site that doesn't costs a dime.
So many fun girls are there messaging and meeting eachother.
And I bet there is someone (or more than one) for you.
Although most of them want one-nighters, there are a
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 09:49 -0400, micah wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Horms wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:21:38AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> >
> >>In order to hopefully help kickstart the security update process, I've
> >>drafted some DSA text for our sarge/2.6.8 kernels (attached). Thanks to
> >
Hey,
Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:21:38AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>
>>In order to hopefully help kickstart the security update process, I've
>>drafted some DSA text for our sarge/2.6.8 kernels (attached). Thanks to
>>Micah, we have CAN IDs assigned for a number of things we just
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:57:48PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:06:47AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>
> > This may have used to be the case, but should not be a problem anymore, we
> > have only one kernel per released architecture, and make it e
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:06:47AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> This may have used to be the case, but should not be a problem anymore, we
> have only one kernel per released architecture, and make it easy enough for
> them to build modules for the official kernels, the deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 325117 +upstream
Bug#325117: NFS problem(s) with kernel 2.6
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
tag 325117 +upstream
thanks
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:11:56AM +0200, Ruediger Oberhage wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hello,
>
> many thanks for your kind reply.
>
> > is it possible for you to test the 2.6.12 kernel package
> > that has been produced for Sarge. Its available at the
> > following URL as 2
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:21:38AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> In order to hopefully help kickstart the security update process, I've
> drafted some DSA text for our sarge/2.6.8 kernels (attached). Thanks to
> Micah, we have CAN IDs assigned for a number of things we just had
> marked as security
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:01:28AM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> Horms wrote:
>
> >What exactly happens when you experience a crash?
> >
> >
> I have run X with the fbdev driver instead of ati or radeon for a few
> minutes, and it didn't crash. A few minutes may be too few, but if I use
>
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:06:47AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > "Yann Dirson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Debian is not listed in the list of supported OS on the VMware website[1].
> > > We all know here there is no reason for it not to work
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:01:28AM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> Horms wrote:
>
> >What exactly happens when you experience a crash?
> >
> >
> I have run X with the fbdev driver instead of ati or radeon for a few
> minutes, and it didn't crash. A few minutes may be too few, but if I use
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 332231 -patch
Bug#332231: CAN-2005-2873: ipt_recent bug: stops working after a 250 days uptime
Tags were: upstream security patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
tag 332231 -patch
thanks
This patch has been rejected by upstream
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Horms wrote:
What exactly happens when you experience a crash?
I have run X with the fbdev driver instead of ati or radeon for a few
minutes, and it didn't crash. A few minutes may be too few, but if I use
the ati or radeon drivers, it crashes quite reliably in under a minute,
if I'm actua
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:08:39PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 08:24:49PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > also it would be _very_ cool to do the switch after a major upload.
> > > just the switch to the newer too
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 330287 -patch
Bug#330287: linux-2.6: CAN-2005-3055 Oops while completing async USB via
usbdevio
Tags were: patch security
Tags removed: patch
> tag 330287 +upstream
Bug#330287: linux-2.6: CAN-2005-3055 Oops while completing async USB via
usbdevio
tag 330287 -patch
tag 330287 +upstream
clone 330287 -1
retitle -1 kernel-source-2.6.8: CAN-2005-3055 Oops while completing async USB
via usbdevio
reassign -1 kernel-source-2.6.8
I was wrong, 2.6.8 is also affected, but 2.4.27 does not seem to be.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream security
>From CAN-2005-3055:
Linux kernel 2.6.8 to 2.6.14-rc2 allows local users to cause a denial
of service (kernel OOPS) via a userspace process that issues a USB
Request Block (URB) to a USB device and terminates before the URB is
finished,
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386
Severity: normal
I am running the stable kernel on a production server, leading to the
following message during this night's backup of an XFS partition via
xfsdump:
Oct 7 04:56:18 rt2 kernel: pagebuf_get: failed to lookup pages
Oct 7 04:56:18 rt2 last messa
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:10:05AM +0200, Colin Leroy wrote:
> On 07 Oct 2005 at 13h10, Horms wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I took a look at making a backport, and it seems that
> > some of the problems are there, but without a deeper inspection
> > of the code its difficult to tell if the problems manif
On 07 Oct 2005 at 13h10, Horms wrote:
Hi,
> I took a look at making a backport, and it seems that
> some of the problems are there, but without a deeper inspection
> of the code its difficult to tell if the problems manifest or not.
That was easy to get the oops:
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=im_not_hf
> Hi,
Hello,
many thanks for your kind reply.
> is it possible for you to test the 2.6.12 kernel package
> that has been produced for Sarge. Its available at the
> following URL as 2.6.12-5.99
Well, I did try some packages mentioned to be available on
http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-
33 matches
Mail list logo
