-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
dann frazier wrote: > > I'm up for helping, but might not have much time till next week. I'm > travelling to the east coast for work, but should have net there. I see > dilinger was setting you up w/ commit access - do you wanna use a file > there to coordinate? I've got a file in people/micah/pending_CVE_requests where I've put all these and will be crafting the descriptions and the URIs, feel free to add to it. >>>>arch-ia64-ptrace-getregs-putregs.dpatch >> >>Need description and URI for CVE > > > I looked into this one. This actually isn't a security patch, but this > bug fix is a pre-req for the fix to CAN-2005-1761. Noted >>>>net-bridge-mangle-oops-1.dpatch >>>>net-bridge-mangle-oops-2.dpatch >> >>According to the 2.6.8-16sarge1 changelog: >> Excluded from security-only release >> * net-bridge-mangle-oops-1.dpatch, net-bridge-mangle-oops-2.dpatch >> Fix oops when mangling and brouting and tcpdumping packets >> Needed for net-bridge-forwarding-poison-1.dpatch >>This meant to me that this is not a security patch and I was not >>tracking this, has this changed? > > > These patches are still listed in the 2.6.8-16sarge1 series file. I realize now that these are pre-requsites for the mangle-oops patch, so I've noted that. >>Others that we need CVEs for: >>dannf: CONFIG_PREEMPT on ia64 > > > Let me know how you want me to proceed with this one; should I file a > bug so that we have a reference? I just need confirmation on the text that I sent you for this, and a reference URI (git patch URL maybe, or any mailing list discussion references). I put the text into that file I mentioned above... Micah -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDRug89n4qXRzy1ioRAi51AKCV4rNN+13S5tz59khaL3EG5nKBywCcCBUQ 1hIovyuTdkM9o3wsDUEX/Fw= =Ve8p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
