Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...

2005-10-04 Thread Horms
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 11:46:18PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote: > Le lundi 03 octobre 2005 à 18:01 +0900, Horms a écrit : > > > > What is the status of replacing initrd. Do we actually have a solution > > that works across a wide range of architectres? Wide enough for > > an upload to experimental?

Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...

2005-10-04 Thread Jeff Bailey
Le lundi 03 octobre 2005 à 18:01 +0900, Horms a écrit : What is the status of replacing initrd. Do we actually have a solution that works across a wide range of architectres? Wide enough for an upload to experimental? Wide enough for unstable and testing? initramfs-tools is test on i386,

Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...

2005-10-04 Thread Horms
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 01:15:00PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Joey Hess wrote: > > I don't actually see any problem with 2.6.13 reaching sid before the d-i > > beta. If would of course be disastrous if it reached etch before the > > beta, since it's certian to break d-i etc etc but that's what RC bu

Re: 2.6.12 crash when using bluetooth

2005-10-04 Thread Uplink
I didn't test yet (I'll probably do it in a few days and come back to you), but I have to correct an affirmation I made about 2.6.13: it's not the kernel that has "so many bugs". It's my BIOS that changes the way APIC works vs. P-ATA when using S-ATA in Enhanced mode :) piix-driven chipset. I g

Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...

2005-10-04 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hello, let's upload 2.6.13 to experimental. Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#328740: linux-source-2.6.12: xfs filesystem corruption

2005-10-04 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Christoph, Maybe I've found an event that triggers the fault. If I do xfs_fsr (file system optimizer program for XFS) and then xfs_check on several filesystems, I've found several times an error reported by xfs_check on this filesystem, the message is: bad nblocks 2 for inode 1026325, coun

Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...

2005-10-04 Thread Joey Hess
Joey Hess wrote: > I don't actually see any problem with 2.6.13 reaching sid before the d-i > beta. If would of course be disastrous if it reached etch before the > beta, since it's certian to break d-i etc etc but that's what RC bugs > are for. Well, aside from the problem that it assumes that th

Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...

2005-10-04 Thread Joey Hess
Horms wrote: > I've CCed debian-boot, hopefully Franz or another d-i person can comment > on this. I'd like to get a better understanding of what the issue > relating to 2.6.12 in testing and d-i is. Though I do not see a week or > so as being a major issue. I don't actually see any problem with 2

Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...

2005-10-04 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 15:56, Allyn, Mark A wrote: > I am a little confused. Is experimental the first distro that anything > goes into in order to get into Debian? Experimental is an *optional* testing ground for developers. Changes that are known to break things or very invasive may be uplo

RE: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...

2005-10-04 Thread Allyn, Mark A
I am a little confused. Is experimental the first distro that anything goes into in order to get into Debian? I thought that Unstable is the place where Debian downloads new changes in the kernel and user applications. On the section in the Debian website, they mention stable, testing, and unsta

Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...

2005-10-04 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 07:59:39PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > My impresion of experimental, is that it is very green, and as such > > > > You mean the trunk branch ? > > No I ment the experimental distribution, or whatever it is called. No, experimental is something true and tried, and was used

Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...

2005-10-04 Thread Horms
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 11:39:00AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:04:10PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:19:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > I've CCed debian-boot, hopefully Franz or another d-i person can comment > > on this. I'd like to get a better u

Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...

2005-10-04 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:04:10PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:19:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > I've CCed debian-boot, hopefully Franz or another d-i person can comment > on this. I'd like to get a better understanding of what the issue > relating to 2.6.12 in testing and d-

Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...

2005-10-04 Thread Horms
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:19:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 06:01:53PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 06:18:40AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have just been thinking about something this morning. > > > > > > We apparently need to w

Bug#229757: Microsoft FrontPage 2003 Pro plus 200 Templates - $29.95

2005-10-04 Thread Raphael Murray
Nero Burning Rom 6.6.0.5 - $19.95 http://Tacoma.okmac.com/ There is no eraser on the end of a scalpel. The art of life lies in a constant readjustment to our surroundings. A bad beginning makes a bad ending. You become responsible forever, for what you have tamed. Money does not

Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...

2005-10-04 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 06:01:53PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 06:18:40AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have just been thinking about something this morning. > > > > We apparently need to wait for 2.6.13 to be uploaded for some time yet for > > the > > debian-ins