On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:04:10PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:19:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > I've CCed debian-boot, hopefully Franz or another d-i person can comment > on this. I'd like to get a better understanding of what the issue > relating to 2.6.12 in testing and d-i is. Though I do not see a week or > so as being a major issue.
I was going to do it too, but forgot :/ > > > As for 2.6.13 vs 2.6.14-rc, thats really a bit of a moot point. > > > My feeling is that by they time we get 2.6.13 ready, 2.6.14 will > > > probably be out, so aiming at 2.6.14-rc for now might be a good idea. > > > But I'm really more concerned about making sure that the > 2.6.12 > > > release happens. Walidi and Dilinger were doing some fine work in that > > > area, but it seems they are busy and not much is happening. > > > > Ok, that seems to correspond to my own feeling, so let's try to do a 2.6.13 > > upload ASAP to experimental. I am also busy this week, but we should go > > ahead > > on that next WE. > > I'm happy to go with experimental any time. Though time is something > I have none of right now :( Seems to be the case for everyone. I think it is enough to say the next guy with free time will make an upload to experimental, and i guess if we all agree on that, it will happen. > > Alternatively we can just upload 2.6.13 as-is to experimental now, and fix > > things as they go, and migrate it to 2.6.14-rc once people get time, but it > > is > > important to get packages out to experimental. > > My impresion of experimental, is that it is very green, and as such You mean the trunk branch ? > uploading might not be a good idea. It could help to isolate problems. > Though does anyone have any time to deal with the bug reports in > a meaningful way? If not, then there might not be a whole log of point > to the process. Well, it will move things forward, right now i think we mostly don't know for sure about the issues, so experimental is a good place to upload things even for us to test internally. If nothing else it will create a reference 2.6.13 .orig tarball. > As for unstable/testing, that is defianately going to give us > a bigger audience. We just need to find time to get the packages > together and time to real with user's responses. Indeed. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
