On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:14:30PM -0700, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Broken
Does anyone in the kernel team know whats up here?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Here is my proposal for the immediate future of 2.4.27 and 2.6.8.
I'm pretty comforatble with the shape of both of them in SVN,
and its probably a good time to think about some releases -
security bugs keep coming in all the time, but I really think
we have to draw a line in the sand and make
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 07:53:03PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:24:51AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: security patch
> >
> > There are another two vulnerabilities fixed in 2.6.12.5, that might require
> > backporting t
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:11:21PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:29:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:44:17AM +0300, Alexander Pytlev wrote:
> > > Hello Debian,
> > >
> > > Kernel 2.4.27-10
> > > With mount isofs filesystem, any
reassign 323318 kernel-source-2.4.27
merge 323318 320256
thanks
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:22:39AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: kernel-headers-2.4.27-2
> Version: 2.4.27-10
> Severity: serious
>
> hostap-modules-i386 fails to build because a kernel header has an array type
> with an incomp
reopen 285017
thanks
Hi Maximilian,
its still a bug in the 2.4.27 package. It may or may not be fixable.
And the patch may or may not be appropriate for Sarge.
My current preference for handling problems like this,
is firstly to encourage the user to use a more up to date kernel.
Secondly downg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 285017
Bug#285017: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my
modem
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 323318 kernel-source-2.4.27
Bug#323318: Array element has incomplete type
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-headers-2.4.27-2' to `kernel-source-2.4.27'.
> merge 323318 320256
Bug#320256: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k6: FTBFS on its intended target
Package: kernel-headers-2.4.27-2
Version: 2.4.27-10
Severity: serious
hostap-modules-i386 fails to build because a kernel header has an array type
with an incomplete element type:
> /tmp/buildd/hostap-modules-i386-0.3.7/kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-386/include/asm/processor.h:75:
> error: array type
tags 322935 + patch
thanks
I'm not sure if we want to do this or not, but here's a patch that
should do it.
Index: control.tree.in
===
--- control.tree.in (revision 3898)
+++ control.tree.in (working copy)
@@ -23,3 +23,13 @@
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 322935 + patch
Bug#322935: linux-tree-2.6.12: please consider building a meta packages
linux-tree-2.6
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
Hi folks,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:29:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:44:17AM +0300, Alexander Pytlev wrote:
> > Hello Debian,
> >
> > Kernel 2.4.27-10
> > With mount isofs filesystem, any mount parameters after
> > iocharset=,map=,session= are ignored.
> >
> > Sample:
>
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 15:06 -0700, Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
> There is a sk98lin driver available from syskonnect.com that is
> offered with a GPL license. I have verified that this driver
> does work for the Intel 88e8050 Chip.
Can you try the linux-image-2.6.12-1- from unstable to see if it
works f
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 20:22 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I just upgraded the kernel on the machine in question to the kernel
> found at
> ftp://ftp.skolelinux.no/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb>,
> and the airo driver worked there too. :)
>
> Please c
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, pan yawen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My scsi hard disk on debian 3.0 throws errors about
> "end_quest: i/o errors ". I logged in as root and ran
> e2fsck command to fix the bad sectors. After that
> command, I got " reiserfs_read_super can not find
> reiserfs on sd (8:1),
> Kernel
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:13:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323176: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: Measured kernel entropy
dropped significantly after upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Alex Samad wrote:
> apt-get source kernel-image-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8-smp
no longer supported.
will be removed from archive soon.
> cd kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-2.6.11
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b -us -uc
>
> and then I get a
>
> cpio:
> /usr/src/space0/kernel-image-2.6.
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.d
There is a sk98lin driver available from syskonnect.com that is
offered with a GPL license. I have verified that this driver
does work for the Intel 88e8050 Chip.
Mark
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 02:15:29PM -0700, Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-i386
> Version: 2.6.8-16
>
> When I try to do a modprobe sk98lin on a system with
> Debian stable (Sarge) that is equipped with an
> Intel 88e8050 LAN Chip, I get an error messages
> saying 'no such devi
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-i386
Version: 2.6.8-16
When I try to do a modprobe sk98lin on a system with
Debian stable (Sarge) that is equipped with an
Intel 88e8050 LAN Chip, I get an error messages
saying 'no such device'.
I have tried this same system using another
operating system and I had n
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb
to poo
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb: package says priority is extra,
override says optional.
kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb: package says priority is extra,
override says op
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb
kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.12-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-4
linux-2.6_2.6.12-4_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb
linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb
linux-image-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb
linux-imag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 322723 linux-2.6
Bug#322723: dhcp-client-udeb: 'id route add' fails w/ "Network is unreachable"
Bug reassigned from package `dhcp-client-udeb' to `linux-2.6'.
> retitle 322723 D-I: 'id route add' fails w/ "Network is unreachable"
Bug#322723: d
linux-2.6_2.6.12-4_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.12-4.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.12-4.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-4_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.12_2.6.12-4_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12-4_all.deb
linux-tree-2.6.12_2.6.12-4_all.deb
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:30:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down
my modem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Broken
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:34:39PM +0200, Manolo Díaz wrote:
> arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:81: Error: Macro with this name was already
> defined
> arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:100: Error: Macro with this name was already
> >>>
I just upgraded the kernel on the machine in question to the kernel
found at
ftp://ftp.skolelinux.no/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb>,
and the airo driver worked there too. :)
Please consider upgrading the kernel in debian/stable (sarge) to a
newer kernel w
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb
to poo
linux-2.6_2.6.12-3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb
linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb
linux-image-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb
linux-imag
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb
kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb: package says priority is extra,
override says optional.
kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb: package says priority is extra,
override says op
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323039: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322765: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322612: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321236: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321167: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322409: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321867: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321885: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322610: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322680: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322680: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322765: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
linux-2.6_2.6.12-3_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb
linux-tree-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb
Accepted:
initrd-tools_0.1.82.dsc
to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.82.dsc
initrd-tools_0.1.82.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.82.tar.gz
initrd-tools_0.1.82_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.82_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 311034 + fixed
Bug#311034: 'man mkinitrd' typo: "managment"
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 312207 + fixed
Bug#312207: initrd-tools: don't include drbd module in initrd
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 312213 + fixed
Bug#3
initrd-tools_0.1.82_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initrd-tools_0.1.82.dsc
initrd-tools_0.1.82.tar.gz
initrd-tools_0.1.82_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
tag 311034 + fixed
tag 312207 + fixed
tag 312213 + fixed
tag 315715 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:49:33 +0200
Source: i
If the sungem{,_phy}.ko files are moved out of the way, the oops will
occur on one of the ieee1394 modules (ohci1394, I think).
If all of those are moved out of the way, it will oops on ohci_hcd, but
keep booting. Here is that oops.
NET: Registered protocol family 15
ohci_hcd: 2004 Nov 08 USB 1.
Since the glint framebuffer driver is not entirely unbroken, I can't
decipher enough of the oops to type it in, but the Caller[]: lines
contain these, in order
bus_add_driver
pci_register_driver
sys_init_module
linux_sparc_syscall
0x132a8
I'll try to get something off serial console later
--
T
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:24:51AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Severity: important
> Tags: security patch
>
> There are another two vulnerabilities fixed in 2.6.12.5, that might require
> backporting to 2.6.8 and 2.4.27. Please see
> http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kern
Package: ftp.debian.org
Version: N/A
Please remove the following packages from sid:
* kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha
* kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64
* kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa
* kernel-image-2.6.8-i386
* kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64
* kernel-image-2.6.8-m68k
* kernel-image-2.6.8-s390
* kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc
* k
Hi folks
This is the last call for testing of the actual candidate for
linux-2.6_2.6.12-3. This is a security update.
The URI is svn://svn.debian.org/kernel/trunk/kernel/source/linux-2.6.
Bastian
--
... bacteriological warfare ... hard to believe we were once foolish
enough to play around with
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:24:51AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Severity: important
> Tags: security patch
>
> There are another two vulnerabilities fixed in 2.6.12.5, that might require
> backporting to 2.6.8 and 2.4.27. Please see
> http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kern
tag 323039 +pending
thanks
These changes are now in SVN.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 323039 +pending
Bug#323039: CAN-2005-2098/CAN-2005-2099: keyring related DoS
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Version: 2.6.12-2
Severity: normal
We run munin & munin-node on our systems, to provide some form of
trend analysis.
The before & after pictures for kernel entropy on 2.6.12 are odd.
The before - was a pretty constant entropy up averaging about 3800
The after
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: important
Tags: security patch
There are another two vulnerabilities fixed in 2.6.12.5, that might require
backporting to 2.6.8 and 2.4.27. Please see
http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/chrisw/linux-2.6.12.y.git;a=commit;h=885605316d76c3fdce23dffe9c59e20539287c
Jakob Bohm writes...
> Since some other people in the project are trying to force-feed 2.6.12 onto
> users machines, the inability to install the 2.6.12 docs along with prior
> docs for comparison is kind of a show-stopper.
It's called 'unstable' for a reason. The fact that it is pretty stable m
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:45:33PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> - Always build asm-offsets.s in the prepare target.
> Effected arches:
> - arm
> - sparc64
I removed the workaround from trunk but the generated files are now put
in the flavour specific package, so this is solved.
Bastian
--
64 matches
Mail list logo
