Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:30:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down
my modem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2004 05:44:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 09 21:44:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx05.gis.net [208.218.130.13]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CcdaN-0000Wd-00; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 21:44:59 -0800
Received: from arf ([207.7.194.180]) by mx05.gis.net; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:44:55
-0500
Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CcdaF-0000mE-00; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:44:51 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my modem
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.4
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:44:50 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686
Version: 2.4.27-6
Severity: normal
I upgraded from 'kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686_2.4.27-2_i386.deb'
to 'kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686_2.4.27-6_i386.deb', after which
my 56K external modem now tops off at about 1.5K a second, down
from it's old 5.5K.
When I downgrade to v2, the modem can do 5.5K again. I tested this
twice (with no other changes) to make sure. Sure enough,
downgrading the kernel seems to fix the modem, and upgrading
it slows it down.
If it matters, the modem's connected to '/dev/ttyS0'.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
Versions of packages kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686 depends on:
ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2 The GNU core utilities
ii fileutils 5.2.1-2 The GNU file management utilities
ii initrd-tools 0.1.74 tools to create initrd image for p
ii modutils 2.4.26-1.1 Linux module utilities
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 285017-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 20:30:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 13:30:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E4lb8-0000lt-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 13:30:18 -0700
Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190])
by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3BF5C011
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:30:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E4lb2-0006TL-Hx
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:30:12 +0200
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:30:12 +0200
From: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my
modem
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, A. Costa wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:05:13 +0200
> Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > any update on the matter?
> > did the mentioned upload solve your problem?
>
> Sorry I can't tell you -- "treachery most foul!" -- I upgraded to kernel
> v2.6.x a while back, and don't currently have any v2.4.27 setup to test
> the update with. :-(
>
> As far as modems go the v2.6.x series is working OK...
thanks for your feedback.
happy to hear that, we are anyway encouraging uses of the 2.6 kernel.
it is the default for the next d-installer release.
therefor closing.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
