New batch, got to run to a meeting, will finish off later.
--
Horms
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/stable-queue.git;a=tree;h=931f32e10913cbb20170dd90623aacb2139a8129;hb=1f61f31059270a271c6fcb7c3c5782dda85238eb;f=queue
kbuild-fix-tags-problem-with-o.patch
- Not in 2.4.27
q
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:07:50PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> With regards to an ABI bump, to be honest I am dubious that we can ever
> make an ABI update. It would probably be just as easy to jump to a
> whole new kernel (2.6.8 -> 2.6.12?), which is something that we should
> seriously consider.
An
Hi Marcelo,
Another fix from 2.6.12.3 that seems approprite for 2.4.
Should apply cleanly to your tree.
Signed-off-by: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Michael Krufky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:06:41 + (-0400)
Subject: [PATCH] v4l cx88 hue offset fix
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.12.3
X
Hi Marcelo,
is this appropriate for 2.4? It seems to apply cleanly to
your current git tree.
Signed-off-by: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: john stultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 05:08:54 + (+1000)
Subject: [PATCH] ppc32: stop misusing ntps time_offset value
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.1
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 10:36:04PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Horms said he had merged in up to 2.6.12.2, so I went through the
> 2.6.12.3 changes. Here's my notes - I've committed the three I marked
> applicable.
>
> [PATCH] If ACPI doesn't find an irq listed, don't accept 0 as a valid PCI irq
Horms said he had merged in up to 2.6.12.2, so I went through the
2.6.12.3 changes. Here's my notes - I've committed the three I marked
applicable.
[PATCH] If ACPI doesn't find an irq listed, don't accept 0 as a valid PCI irq.
- Fixes a bug introduced between 2.6.8 & 2.6.12
[PATCH] revert nf_res
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 12:32 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 07:26:26PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > hey,
> > Sorry if this has already been discussed; but I noticed that although
> > 2.6.8-16 is the latest version of kernel-source in sarge[1],
> > 2.6.8-15sarge1 appears to be what
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:11:29PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:40:26 +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> >> * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
> >> > I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
> >
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 07:26:26PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> hey,
> Sorry if this has already been discussed; but I noticed that although
> 2.6.8-16 is the latest version of kernel-source in sarge[1],
> 2.6.8-15sarge1 appears to be what is in the works[2] for a security
> update.
>
> All the
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 19:26 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> hey,
> Sorry if this has already been discussed; but I noticed that although
> 2.6.8-16 is the latest version of kernel-source in sarge[1],
> 2.6.8-15sarge1 appears to be what is in the works[2] for a security
> update.
fyi, similar issue
ok ive been looking at linux distros that work under
windows, i dont want to duel boot or lose connection
while reinstalling linux so i wanted to develope
another linux distro of my own making under windows
and then burn it to bootable cd. i wanted to use
debian and i seen a colinux group that has
hey,
Sorry if this has already been discussed; but I noticed that although
2.6.8-16 is the latest version of kernel-source in sarge[1],
2.6.8-15sarge1 appears to be what is in the works[2] for a security
update.
All the patches referenced in -16 are already in svn for 2.6.8-15sarge1,
so looks li
Package: linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.12-1
Severity: normal
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc/include/asm-ppc points to
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1/include/asm-ppc. But there is no asm-ppc in
linux-headers-2.6.12-1.
This breaks building out of tree modules..
Sjoerd
--
On Sunday 31 July 2005 03:00, Goswin von Brederlow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No it doesn't. If you have a working Debian system with root on LVM and
> > install kernel 2.6.13-rc4 then it won't boot. This is due to a bug in
> > initrd-tools so I don't think that the bug should be reassigned
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:40:26 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
>> > I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
>> > place for us to make uploads of updated 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 kerels for
>> >
Hi Horms,
On Monday, 01 Aug 2005, Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 11:43]:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Well, even though i thought i fixed this in helsinki, there seems to be no
mkvmlinuz support in the powerpc images, thus the image is not usable, at
least for none-yaboot users.
I will work on fixing this now, but wanted
Dear Homeowner,
Did you realize that you don't need to be paying high rates
on your current Mor|gage?
If fact rates are at the lowest they have been at in 50 Years!
We are extending refinance opportunities unheard of in the industry.
Just visit the link below and Complete the
The 1 minute Instan
* Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 12:42]:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:14:24PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 12:01]:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > Yes, that was about my intention as well. So, yes, please move fo
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:14:24PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 12:01]:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Yes, that was about my intention as well. So, yes, please move forward
> > > with 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 and send a list of
Hi,
We have the highest quality~Replica~Watches?
We only sell premium~watches.
These original~watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars.
We sell them for much less.
See our~selection~here
http://qijyod.replicaz4time.net
* Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 12:01]:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Yes, that was about my intention as well. So, yes, please move forward
> > with 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 and send a list of recommended updates.
> I need to go through the BTS and see what els
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 11:43]:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
> > > > I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
> > > > pl
* Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 11:43]:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
> > > I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
> > > place for us to make uploads of updated 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 kerels for
> > > S
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
> > I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
> > place for us to make uploads of updated 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 kerels for
> > Sarge? This would allow us to remove these kernels from
* Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
> I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
> place for us to make uploads of updated 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 kerels for
> Sarge? This would allow us to remove these kernels from unstable/testing
> and still provide maintenence releases for users.
26 matches
Mail list logo
