Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Severity: normal
setup:
- grub not lilo
- /boot separate partition
- mbr
- grub in /dev/hda1 (/boot)
install linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: reboot, whammo.
NOTHING boots.
i get grub error messages about "must load linux kernel before initrd".
on BOTH THE OLD AND
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 266674 normal
Bug#266674: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686: Badness in vesafb module
Bug#290295: rmmod vesafb error
Severity set to `normal'.
> merge 319357 266674
Bug#266674: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686: Badness in vesafb module
Bug#319357: Device 'vesa
Good day to you sir,
It's finally here : The Digital CableFilter
Goto the page between the arrows below:
->->->-> filtersppv.com <-<-<-<-
No More? Add /r to the domain above.
TTYL,
Lewis J. Sheree, VI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 319357 kernel
Bug#319357: Device 'vesafb0' does not have a release() function, it is broken
and must be fixed.
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686' to `kernel'.
> merge 319357 266674
Bug#266674: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686: Ba
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:57:34 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> - get at least 5 archs successfully building; probably i386, plus some
>>>combination of the archs that're already in 2.6.12-1 (
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 10:57:34PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > And, once all of that is done:
> > - start using initramfs instead of an initrd.
>
> Anyone working on this? I'm fed up with mkinitrd enough to want to
> rewrite it, which would use initramfs then.
Look for mkinitramfs in
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:57:34 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> - get at least 5 archs successfully building; probably i386, plus some
>>combination of the archs that're already in 2.6.12-1 (powerpc,
>>ia64, sparc, alpha, s390). The more
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - get at least 5 archs successfully building; probably i386, plus some
>combination of the archs that're already in 2.6.12-1 (powerpc,
>ia64, sparc, alpha, s390). The more the merrier, of course.. When's
>amd64 going to start being autobu
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:30:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#260003: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:30:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#250468: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:30:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318121: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
linux-2.6_2.6.12-1 just hit incoming, woo!
My definite goals for 2.6.12-2 are:
- differentiate between @longclass@ and @class@, as Frederik pointed out
that the @class@ in 2.6.12-1 was making the synopsis line too long.
This is already checked into svn; it's up to arch people to update
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.12-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.12-1.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.12.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12.orig.tar.gz
linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-1_all.deb
to pool/main/
(new) linux-2.6_2.6.12-1.diff.gz optional devel
(new) linux-2.6_2.6.12-1.dsc optional devel
(new) linux-2.6_2.6.12.orig.tar.gz optional devel
(new) linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-1_all.deb optional doc
Linux kernel specific documentation for version 2.6.12
This package provides the various README files a
linux-2.6_2.6.12-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.12-1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.12.orig.tar.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.12-1.diff.gz
linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12-1_all.deb
linux-tree-2.6.12_2.6.12-1_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.12_2.6.12-1_all.deb
li
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686
Version: 2.6.11-7
Severity: normal
I get this same error message in every fscking boot and it looks this in
kern.log:
Jul 21 14:27:39 heresy kernel: Device 'vesafb0' does not have a release()
function, it is broken and must be fixed.
Jul 21 14:27:39 heresy ke
>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> As you all know the hsflinmodem packages are non-free and crippled to
>>> 14.4 kbps. Has anybody ported the hsflinmodem-5.03.27 (the latest free
>>> versions) to work for kernels 2.6.x?? In case not, the removal of
>>> kernels 2.4.x is a very B
Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:17:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Andres Salomon wrote:
>> > [snip]
>> >> > It is IMHO not realistic to expect the rest of the world to wait for
>> >> > some obscure su
18 matches
Mail list logo
