On Tue, 10 May 2005 19:21:04 -0400 (EDT), Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Tue, 10 May 2005, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does this mean that the common kernel source package would no
>> longer use make-kpkg to build the image? If not, why not
>> co-ordinate with kernel-packa
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64-smp
Version: 2.6.8-6
Severity: normal
Every time I hit the blank key on my keyboard, two errors are logged in
syslog. (type 6 unix layout, on type 6 us this is the esc key)
Running current sarge 2.6 kernel on a ultra2 2x300mhz.
May 10 15:16:32 sundry kernel:
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 10:48:09 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line statfs returns wrong values for 250Gb FAT fs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:44:14PM +0200, dicicat wrote:
> >Actually, the kernels in sarge should be based of -13, which
> >should not have this problem. Which kernel are you using?
> >
> >
> >
> I have actually the 2.6.8-2-15 for I686 processor
That version does have this bug. But it should not
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
Does this mean that the common kernel source package would no
longer use make-kpkg to build the image? If not, why not co-ordinate
with kernel-package to get a common mechanism of creating control and
config files? kerel-package already has me
On Tue, 10 May 2005 22:54:24 +0200, Christian T Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Anyhow, I like kernel-package a lot (and I use it differently than
> other arches, just like I inherited it). However with some recent
> version, something seems to have changed so that I can not
> cross-compile
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 03:18:28PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does this mean that the common kernel source package would no
> longer use make-kpkg to build the image? If not, why not co-ordinate
> with kernel-package to get a common mechanism of creating control and
> conf
On Sat, 07 May 2005, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > "# work around idiocy in recent kernel versions" i find that output
> > quite wierd. localversion was meant for distributions and is much
> > easier to use than to change EXTRAVERSION in the Makefile.
>
> You are just displaying your ignora
OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
Filesystem may have the corrupted free-cluster value.
I couldn't reproduce the problem on 2.6.12-rc4.
Could you try a recently dosfsck (dosfstools-2.11 or later)?
Also could you send the output of above program?
"dosfsck" did find a problem in the free-cluster value. And al
Hi,
Does this mean that the common kernel source package would no
longer use make-kpkg to build the image? If not, why not co-ordinate
with kernel-package to get a common mechanism of creating control and
config files? kerel-package already has mechanisms for creating the
rules file, c
Horms a écrit :
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:15:03PM +0900, Horms wrote:
tag 308034 pending
thanks
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:28:09AM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
reassign 308034 kernel-source-2.6.8
severity 308034 important
thanks
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:12 +0200, dicicat wrote:
Packa
I totally forgot to paste the little app I did. That won't fix the bug
until 2.6.11 but at least gives the administrators a little break and
warning.
https://pear.homelinux.org/mirrors/check-dst-load.pl
read it, pretty much straightforward
--
David Coallier T: 800-361-1388 x145
Pro
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Version: 2.6.8-13
Severity: important
The fsid option in /etc/exports is being ignored by the kernel. Exported
filesystems seem to have the automatic fsid based on the device and not the one
specified. The fsid seems to work correctly with the unstable package
Hi,
Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> printf("f_bsize = %ld blocks\nf_blocks = %ld blocks\nf_bfree = %ld
>> blocks\nused = %ld blocks\n",
>>stats.f_bsize, stats.f_blocks, stats.f_bfree, used);
>>
>> kib = stats.f_bsize / 1024;
>> printf("total = %ld KiB\nfree = %ld Ki
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 02:38:18PM +0200, Jose Luis Marin wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> We have a moderately-loaded NFS server running Debian/Sarge with the
> stock kernel 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 (the current Debian binary deb). It
> serves around 10 NFS client connections from a Solaris 8 box. For
> what
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:57:43PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> >This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> >#307900: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386: This image, and maybe some others are
> >easiably locally rootable. Exploit included.,
> >whi
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:15:03PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> tag 308034 pending
> thanks
>
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:28:09AM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > reassign 308034 kernel-source-2.6.8
> > severity 308034 important
> > thanks
> >
> > On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:12 +0200, dicicat wrote:
> > >
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#307900: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386: This image, and maybe some others are
easiably locally rootable. Exploit included.,
which was filed against the kernel-source-2.6.8 package.
It has been closed by one of
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-15
Followup-For: Bug #272693
I am experiencing similar problems with my external USB harddisk.
Every access to the USB device hangs uninterruptible (D-state) after
switching on the device.
e.g.
18736 pts/8D+ 0:00 cat /p
Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2005 17:22:56 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278161: Unable to reproduce XFS panic
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 06:24:29PM +0100, Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386
> Version: 2.6.8-13
> Severity: important
>
>
> I have a 250Gb external USB 2.0 hard-drive formatted with FAT32 and "df"
> always reports 64Kb of used space on it, although it contains a couple o
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:58:56AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2005 09:15:29 +1000, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Could you please elaborate? I personally think it is pretty damn
> > hard for kernel-package to cope with all situations, and that in
> > many ways the ker
Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2005 17:19:23 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 308034 pending
Bug#308034: Radeon module unable to load since last Sarge update
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
tag 308034 pending
thanks
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:28:09AM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> reassign 308034 kernel-source-2.6.8
> severity 308034 important
> thanks
>
> On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:12 +0200, dicicat wrote:
> > Package: xlibmesa-dri
> >
> > Bonjour,
>
> Note that this is an English b
25 matches
Mail list logo
