Home Owners - do you have less than perfect credit?
We'll quickly match you up with the best provider based on your needs
We specialize in less than perfect credit.
We'll help you get the yes you deserve.
http://vesk.echeneisvalle.com/prime/properly/
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
* Christoph Hellwig
> Including it with that patch sounds reasonable. If you attach a
> backport patch to this bug we can make sure to include it. Else
> I'm not sure it's going to happen in-time for sarge (or rather at
> all for 2.6.8 as 2.6.10 has the change already)
Excellent! I doubt
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Jon Thackray wrote:
> System has Intel 865 MB, P4/3400, 2Gb RAM, five discs including
> one SCSI and one SATA. It worked fine with the 2.6.5 kernel, but the
> 2.6.8 kernel won't boot.
did you try booting with append "acpi=off"?
please send dmesg of 2.6.5
thanks for your fee
Home Owners - do you have less than perfect credit?
We'll quickly match you up with the best provider based on your needs
We specialize in less than perfect credit.
We'll help you get the yes you deserve.
http://vesk.echeneisvalle.com/prime/properly/
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Subject: usb_storage issue: A (not so) funny way to (or to not) delete files.
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386
Version: 2.6.8-10
Severity: grave
1) Kernel
ii kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386 2.6.8-10 Linux kernel image for version
2.6.8 on 386.
ii kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686 2.6.8-10 Linux
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7
Version: 2.6.8-10
Severity: normal
I have tried loading both the pdc202xx_new and pdc202xx_old modules and neither
driver detects the secondard IDE controller in my system. The controller is a
Promise PDC20265 Ultra 100, and it is on-board. The first and second
Home Owners - do you have less than perfect credit?
We'll quickly match you up with the best provider based on your needs
We specialize in less than perfect credit.
We'll help you get the yes you deserve.
http://vesk.echeneisvalle.com/prime/properly/
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
At Thu, 13 Jan 2005 05:01:50 -0800,
Johan Walles wrote:
> According to the man page:
>
> "
> RETURN VALUE
> The rewind function returns no value. Upon successful
> completion,
> fgetpos, fseek, fsetpos return 0, and ftell returns the current
> offset.
> Otherwise, -
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.8-10
Followup-For: Bug #268208
System has Intel 865 MB, P4/3400, 2Gb RAM, five discs including
one SCSI and one SATA. It worked fine with the 2.6.5 kernel, but the
2.6.8 kernel won't boot.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 10:39:11PM +0100, Nicolas Jungers wrote:
> On 10 janv. 05, at 09:39, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 06:59:38PM +0100, Nicolas Jungers wrote:
> >>Le 31 déc. 04, à 00:24, Sven Luther a écrit :
> >>
> >>>On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 07:11:34PM +0100, Nicolas Junger
Rejected: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-2.tar.gz is NEW for unstable.
Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version
(100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-2_all.deb is NEW for unstable.
Rejected:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:05:48AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> It appears that is a recent change[0]. Patch is part of that thread, at
> [1]. [0] also mentions that BIOS support for EFI may become more common
> during sarge's lieftime.
>
> [Older versions didn't used to check for the sign
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.76
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
Please set the mkinitrd.conf MODULES value to dep, at least on powerpc. ON
powerpc, we have at least three subarches (pegasos 1, prep and some oldworlds)
which have troubles with either bigger initrd images (bigger than 1.5MB
com
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386
Version: 2.6.8-10
Severity: important
After umounting and disconnection my usb stick, I got follow kernel
message:
slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `scsi_cmd_cache': Can't free
all objects
[] kmem_cache_destroy+0x79/0xe0
[] scsi_destroy_command_freelist+
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 04:24:27PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at
> least some security fixes, notably the ones that change the kernel
> module ABI, and we need to update things to reflect the new kernel
> "abiname". Here's my underst
Tore Anderson wrote:
As I understand it
the GPT detection code fails if it doesn't find a valid "Protective
MBR", ie. a MSDOS partition table with one partition, spanning the
whole drive, with the type set to 0xEE. Am I wrong assuming that such
a partition table will almost certainly never be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 290170 kernel
Bug#290170: mount segfaults when mounting a new partition (160 GB)
Bug reassigned from package `mount' to `kernel'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:26:39AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Completely new kernels have too many changes beyond security and
> stability fixes, they will never go in a stable point release. The
> maintainer shouldn't have uploaded them to stable-proposed-updates
> in the first place.
Well, at
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 289894 gnome-pilot
Bug#289894: EPSON Perfection 610 fails scanning
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `gnome-pilot'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
I second this request. GPT is in my opinion superior to the MSDOS
partition-table type, for several reasons like robustness (no fragile
linked list of extended partitions, backup partition table),
flexibility and of course scalability, the reason why Mr. DeRobertis
wanted it.
As he also
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 19:37 +0900, Horms wrote:
> thanks for your bug report. I have reasigned it to initrd-tools as
> it appears to be a bug with in the module selection for the initrd image,
> which is controled by that package.
Woo and yay! Thanks for the progress update.
--
greg, [EMAIL PROT
Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686
Version: 2.6.10-3
Severity: Minor
--
When I made a rmmod vesafb I get:
vesafb: probe of vesafb0 failed with error -6
Device 'vesafb0' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be
fixed.
Badness in device_release at drivers/base/core.c:85
[] kobj
At Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:42:18 +0100,
Johan Walles wrote:
> The output of the following program is:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/test$ ./a.out
> fseek: Unknown error 12345
>
> Since I set errno to 12345 before making the (failing) fseek() call,
> fseek() itself apparently fails without setting errno.
>
Selon Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:50:17PM +0100, Peter Egli wrote:
> > I also had problems on my debian (testing) since I did
> > upgrade my kernel from 2.4.26 to 2.4.27 (was yesterday).
> >
> > Not with a palm, but with an other package that accesses
> > temperature se
reassign 284961 initrd-tools
thanks
Hi Greg,
thanks for your bug report. I have reasigned it to initrd-tools as
it appears to be a bug with in the module selection for the initrd image,
which is controled by that package.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:50:17PM +0100, Peter Egli wrote:
> I also had problems on my debian (testing) since I did
> upgrade my kernel from 2.4.26 to 2.4.27 (was yesterday).
>
> Not with a palm, but with an other package that accesses
> temperature sensors over the serial interface
> (ttySx -->
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 288812 nvidia-modules-i386
Bug#288812: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrade from v2 to v6 breaks
nvidia-kernel-2.4.27-1-686
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686' to
`nvidia-modules-i386'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
..
> We are no longer
> maintaining 2.4 (last update to our tree is several months old, and 2.4.28
> merge is not on the todo list).
2.4.28 won't be included in sarge.
for the 2.4 series 2.4.27 is targeted.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:03:57 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#20: kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-686-smp: arch/i386/boot
and content missing from kernel header tree
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 02:16:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Elrond wrote:
> > Is this bug really pending?
> >
> > That is: Is it really fixed in svn?
> >
> > Or did it just inherit the pending due to the clone?
>
> Both, it inherited the pending due to the clone and it's fixed in svn
> for kern
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 04:46:39PM +0100, A.M.P. Boelens wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7
> Version: 2.6.10-3
> Severity: normal
>
>
> I upgraded my kernel from 2.6.8 (kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7) to 2.6.10 k7
> (kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7) and as a result my digital camera (Konica dimage
>
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 04:38:48AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After some digging, I found that the problem seems related to gpilotd and not
> kernel. In fact if I stop or suspend gpilotd, everything works as expected!
> No more errors.
> I'm missing the skills and experience to understand ex
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 283241 +pending
Bug#283241: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7: 2.6.8 and 2.6.9: utime(2) hangs on smbfs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:27:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-10 16:24]:
> > As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not tracking that) are
>
> mips and mipsel have been updated. However, given the new local root
> exploit (fixed in SVN), we'
Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2005 04:54:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2005 04:54:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
* Marc Haber:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 10:25:37AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Marc Haber:
>> > On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 08:52:59PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>> >> Cherrypicking makes little sense, because there are only cherries. :-)
>> >
>> > For my systems, I care about security holes be
Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:31:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289990: ACPI problems with kernels 2.6.x for Dell Inspiron
4100
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
38 matches
Mail list logo
