On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:00:05 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when I see errors like that it is usually just before I have
> to go to the store and get a new hard drive because the old
> one has failed. Are you seeing the same problem with other
> kernel's too?
Hey,
I get the same errors
Dear Client,
Some time ago you filled out
a form on the internet requesting help with refinancing
your home. Since then we have not heard from you.
If you have already refinanced or have not yet found what you
are looking for, you may want to take a look at our
website, our rates start at 3.075%. O
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686
Version: 2.4.27-6
Severity: normal
File: kernel-image-2.4.27-1
APM does not see or react upon closing the lid of my IBM thinkpad X22
Version 2.4.27-2, and earlier kernels are fine. With v2,
closing the lid shows
Dec 13 21:46:25 oliebij apmd[1064]: Suspen
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 02:53:02PM -0500, Debian Installer wrote:
> Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version
> (100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: Rejected: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-2_all.deb: old version
> (2.6.
Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version
(100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: Rejected: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-2_all.deb: old version
(2.6.9-3) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable.
Rejected:
[Cc'ing debian-kernel for clarification]
Joey Hess wrote:
> Here are the ones the testing security team is currently tracking
> that are fixed in unstable but don't yet have a fix in sarge, plus a few
> others of interest:
It seems as if the local DoS in the a.out loader (only exploitable when
VM
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 12:11:47PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> reassign 284116 kernel-package
Package kernel-package already has an option to include vmlinux in the
images (install_vmlinux, which fixed Bug#243927), so I still think the
problem is in the kernel-image packages...
> Could you be a little
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 12:15:57PM -0500, Christopher Priest wrote:
> Is this helpful
> http://web.archive.org/web/2711071330/sanjose.alteon.com/license-agree.shtml
Not really. That licence doesn't allow Debian to distribute whatever
it is that's being licenced. There's only permission for p
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 12:15:57PM -0500, Christopher Priest wrote:
> Is this helpful
> http://web.archive.org/web/2711071330/sanjose.alteon.com/license-agree.shtml
This license doesn't let us distribute the software.
This is pretty clearly stated in the first two sentences of the first
two n
> Perhaps someone can track down the original license
> listed on the now-defunct web page (supposedly
http://alteonwebsystems.com/)
> where Alteon allowed people to download the firmware?
> (This is a sad lesson for the developers of the Arsenic enhanced firmware:
> Never, ever, point to someone e
The current owner of alteon is nortel.
http://web.archive.org/web/20040117112911/www.alteonwebsystems.com/ascii/
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:46:56 +0900, Horms wrote:
[...]
>
> Hi,
>
> I think that I have discovered the cause of the problem.
>
> It seems to be caused by the 093_tty_lockup.diff patch which was applied
> to resolve CAN-2004-081, a security bug relating to race
> conditions in the TTY subsystem.
Your message dated Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:48:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#283133: Please close - problem resolved
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 03:04:34PM +, Håvard Dahle wrote:
> I am sorry. As it turns out, this is now resolved, and I suspect that eth1394
> never was the culprit.
>
> I am not sure what was the real fix. I am tracking debian sid, and updates to
> discover (I think) made the problem go away.
I am sorry. As it turns out, this is now resolved, and I suspect that eth1394
never was the culprit.
I am not sure what was the real fix. I am tracking debian sid, and updates to
discover (I think) made the problem go away.
So you may close this report (I would have done it myself if I had kn
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 05:20:08PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
>
> The original report (#284356) was submitted by Joey Hess and made no
> reference to proprietary modules. This affects modules shipped by
> Debian too.
>
> The problem is that a new Debian release of the "same" kernel (2.4.27-1)
> h
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 04:17:17PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:29:34PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 07:26:40PM +0100, Paul Akkermans wrote:
> > > Hello everyone,
> >
> > HEY! RETARD!! This is the third time this week you've posted to
> > debian-ke
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 06:38:57AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Philipp Niemann wrote:
> |
> | In the script /usr/sbin/mkinitrd, Line 497, is a find which seems to
> | search /proc/scsi for modules needed to mount the root device. If one
> | has
tag 285301 +pending
thanks
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 01:12:02PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Package: initrd-tools
> Version: 0.1.75
>
>
> See attached patch.
>
> Harri
Thanks, Josh Kwan has added this to SVN and it should appear in the next
release.
--
Horms
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 12:23:58AM -0800, Tzvetan Mikov wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> >Did any of these discussions included (proposed) patches or fixes?
> >If so do you have any links handy?
>
> So far there have been no discussions. There was a somewhat similar
> problem reported years ago, which I d
On Monday 13 of December 2004 03:34, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:11:42AM +0100, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> > Package: initrd-tools
> > Version: 0.1.74
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > I'd like to see some warning, if /proc/sys/kernel/real-root-dev is equal
> > 0. That means no root devic
Horms wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 08:48:09PM +0100, Stefan Beck wrote:
Horms wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:10:29AM +0100, Stefan Beck wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686-smp
Version: 2.4.27-2
Severity: important
Does this kernel exhibit the same behaviour?
http://debian.vergenet.net/
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 05:51:23PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Joey Hess wrote:
> [...]
> > Did you mean to build-dep on "kernel-tree-2.4.27 >= 2.4.27-6"?
>
> No, kernel-tree-2.4.27 2.4.27-6 provides kernel-tree-2.4.27-6.
Strange but true!
I think we can close this. Yes?
Actually, I ha
Your message dated Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:58:44 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#283115: kernel oops ins xfs_acl_get_attr with
kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686-smp
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 285301 +pending
Bug#285301: initrd-tools: typo in mkinitrd
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 281439 kernel-source-2.6.9
Bug#281439: xserver-xfree86: lockup with linux 2.6.9 using mplayer
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86' to `kernel-source-2.6.9'.
> retitle 281439 kernel: 2.6.9 has a regression from 2.6.8.1 in the i830 DRM
reassign 281439 kernel-source-2.6.9
retitle 281439 kernel: 2.6.9 has a regression from 2.6.8.1 in the i830 DRM
module
thanks
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 01:21:23PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> retitle 281439 kernel: 2.6.9 has a regression from 2.6.8.1 in the i830 DRM
> module
> reassign 281439 k
Horms wrote:
Did any of these discussions included (proposed) patches or fixes?
If so do you have any links handy?
So far there have been no discussions. There was a somewhat similar
problem reported years ago, which I don't think was fully investigated:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
Your message dated Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:36:51 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#279666: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7: Runs out of network
buffers
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 08:17:23AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.6.9
> Version: 2.6.9-1
>
>
> Using ALSA from kernel-source-2.6.9 is much slower than
> it was with kernel-source-2.6.8, when using xine.
> It can be worked around with xine using OSS device (which is
> al
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:29:34PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 07:26:40PM +0100, Paul Akkermans wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
>
> HEY! RETARD!! This is the third time this week you've posted to
> debian-kernel. This is the third time I'm telling you to fuck off.
> I was
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 270376 kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386,kernel-image-2.6.9-1-386
Bug#270376: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386: PCMCIA Nic stops working after upgradin g
to 2.6.6/7/8
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386' to
`kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386,kernel-i
reassign 27037 kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386,kernel-image-2.6.9-1-386
Thanks
I've upgraded to 2.6.9 to see if the problem still exists and it does. I am
still unable to use my PCMCIA cards under any 2.6 kernel.
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.74
The mkinitrd script has the wrong module listed for the Initio
INI-A100U2W SCSI card. It attempts to probe for a nonexistent module
called "inia100", when it should be looking fof the module "a100u2w".
On line 518 of mkinitrd it says:
s/^INIA100$/inia100/; t
reassign 284567 kernel-source-2.4.27
thanks
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 01:22:24AM -0800, Tzvetan Mikov wrote:
> Package: kernel
> Severity: normal
>
> The problem occured while running tar, causing it to segfault. It was
> reproducible until a reboot.
> I am copying the info from syslog below. I d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 284567 kernel-source-2.4.27
Bug#284567: Unable to handle kernel paging request
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `kernel-source-2.4.27'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:18:14PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:51:30PM +0100, Paul Akkermans wrote:
> > Hi group,
> >
> > I have a compicated question. I am analysing the input core. My question is
> > if it is so that the functions and procedures which are defined a
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 01:46:26PM -0800, nhrosen wrote:
> Why is apt-get -f u upgrade asking me now to upgrade to
> kernel-image-2.4.27-1-k7?
>
> This box is on unstable * kernel-image-2.6.9-1-k7.
Likely you have both kernel-image-2.4.27-1-k7 and
kernel-image-2.6.9-1-k7. installed on the machin
38 matches
Mail list logo
