On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:40:55AM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:51:28PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le mercredi 01 d??cembre 2004 ?? 18:48 +0900, Horms a ??crit :
> > > > Another example are the Realtek 8149 drivers. I had to blacklist one
> > > > of the drivers
Your message dated Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:17:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273878: fixed in kernel-image-2.4.27-i386 2.4.27-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:17:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#270297: fixed in kernel-image-2.4.27-i386 2.4.27-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Accepted:
kernel-build-2.4.27-1_2.4.27-6_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386/kernel-build-2.4.27-1_2.4.27-6_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-386_2.4.27-6_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386/kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-386_2.4.27-6_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-586tsc
kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-6.dsc
kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-6.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.4.27-1_2.4.27-6_i386.deb
kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.27-1-586tsc_2.4.27-6_i386.deb
kernel-
Accepted:
kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-6_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-6_all.deb
kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-6_all.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-6_all.deb
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/
Your message dated Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:02:43 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#277681: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:02:43 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#271533: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:02:43 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#272719: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-6.dsc
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-6.diff.gz
kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-6_all.deb
kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-6_all.deb
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-6_all.deb
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:20:31AM -0500, Kevin Everets wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 07:09:31PM -0500, Daniel Nilsson wrote:
>
> > Since that did work, then bug #283133 is probably the same issue.
>
> 283133 is: kernel-image-2.6.9-1-k7: kernel oops on module eth1394 on
> nVidia nForce chipset
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Manu Hallikainen:
Cannot enable dma mode to ide dvd/cd/hd drives.
Did it work with earlier kernels?
Did you load the chipset-specific module? Most ATA interfaces these days
need one for DMA.
ide_generic 1472 0
ide_cd 42528 0
ide_c
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:51:28PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 01 d??cembre 2004 ?? 18:48 +0900, Horms a ??crit :
> > > Another example are the Realtek 8149 drivers. I had to blacklist one
> > > of the drivers. This chipset is really common. So many people will
> > > have to do t
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Guido Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:19 PM
Subject: Bug#283852: not compiling ub.ko? breaks usb-storage
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:58:49PM +0100, Guido
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Everets" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Daniel Nilsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 3:20 PM
Subject: Bug#275356: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.8-1-686-smp: Can't detect IDE CD rom
or IDE ZIP disk on De
- Original Message -
From: "Guido Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 10:58 PM
Subject: Bug#283852: not compiling ub.ko? breaks usb-storage
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:07:19PM +0100, Frank Lic
please keep cc on list,
if you want to send me private gifts than don't hesitate,
but snail mail is usually better for that. ;-)
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004, David Koski wrote:
> I chose one of the latest from the (woody) list provided by apt-get
> kernel-package. BTW, with all the bugs and confusion I d
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:58:49PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:07:19PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > work) I would vote for not compiling it by default if there aren't any good
> > reasons against it. We were fine without it before ;)
> Would blacklisting it in h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 283869 kernel
Bug#283869: kernel-image: solo1 sound module starts the MIC unmutet, laptop
creates static
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image' to `kernel'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please co
Package: kernel-image
Version: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-383
Severity: normal
Hi.
I have a NEC Ultralite laptop, that has a soundcard needing the solo1
module. The Sarge NEW installer is fantastic, and finds all my hardware.
When installed, and firstly rebooted, I realized that whenever the solo1
modu
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:07:19PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.6.9
> Severity: normal
>
> I don't know if this affects all systems but according to google
> I'm at least not the only one. And a little rant on IRC immediatly
> yield some "/me too" results.
>
> Since
On Dec 01, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shouldn't it depend on what kernel is booted rather then what kernels
> are installed?
Maybe it should, but I'm not sure that there is an easy way to implement
this. grep blacklist /etc/hotplug/*
--
ciao, |
Marco | [9533 fiSC3qo3K2SOw]
signatur
> "Mike" == Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:33:32PM +0100, Marco d'Itri
Mike> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is not a problem
>> (/etc/hotplug/blacklist.d/kernel-image-n.n.n-m).
Mike> Actually, it can be. Let's imagine the absur
Hi,
Manu Hallikainen:
> Cannot enable dma mode to ide dvd/cd/hd drives.
>
Did it work with earlier kernels?
Did you load the chipset-specific module? Most ATA interfaces these days
need one for DMA.
> setting using_dma to 1 (on)
> HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
That error cod
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, David Koski wrote:
> >
> > maybe you wanna post your .config?
>
> http://kosmosisland.com/kernel.conf
strange no CONFIG_DRM_SIS, but that's where you compile error occurs.
try to enable it.
any reason why you can't use a more modern kernel?
--
maks
Package: kernel-source-2.6.9
Severity: normal
I don't know if this affects all systems but according to google
I'm at least not the only one. And a little rant on IRC immediatly
yield some "/me too" results.
Since 2.6.9 hotplug tries to use the ub module to handle devices previously
handled by us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Forwarding for your information.
- -- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Bug#275006: Bug fixed for me in linux26 netinst 20041130
Date: Wednesday 01 December 2004 19:28
From: "Deccio, Casey T" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:37:52PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> The problem is with near certainty that you updated from a
> sata-ide driver to a sata-scsi driver. The device names for your disk
> subsequently changed from /dev/hda to /dev/sda.
No, I am positive that I have been using liba
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7
Version: 2.6.8-10
Followup-For: Bug #268609
Cannot enable dma mode to ide dvd/cd/hd drives.
hdparm -d1 /dev/hdXN
setting using_dma to 1 (on)
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
using_dma= 0 (off)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I think there is a problem with kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686, but I'm not sure
> whether I messed up something...
>
> I installed sarge on a SATA host a while ago (Intel ICH, worked just
> fine!). Now I upgraded from the installer's kernel-image
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:27:56PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:06:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > > Obviously, you cannot load the SATA modules if you need the SATA code to
> > > access the har
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:55:59PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> The problem is the following: is the e100 driver available in all kernel
> flavours/versions ?
> If yes, then it is safe to blacklist it in hotplug directly.
> If not, then it is not safe to do it in hotplug because it would
> blacklist
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:06:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > Obviously, you cannot load the SATA modules if you need the SATA code to
> > access the hard disc.
>
> Of course you can, that's what initial ramdisks are for.
In
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 07:09:31PM -0500, Daniel Nilsson wrote:
> Since that did work, then bug #283133 is probably the same issue.
283133 is: kernel-image-2.6.9-1-k7: kernel oops on module eth1394 on
nVidia nForce chipset
I think you must mean a different one.
Kevin.
Hi,
Does anybody have software suspend patches that applies to debian
kernel? Ther're patches at http://softwaresuspend.berlios.de/ for
2.4.27, but they doesn't apply cleanly to debian's kernel. I'm trying to
fix it, to see what happens :)
Thanks in advance!
--
Alexei Chetroi
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:33:32PM +0100, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This is not a problem (/etc/hotplug/blacklist.d/kernel-image-n.n.n-m).
Actually, it can be. Let's imagine the absurd case where kernel-image-x
blacklists eepro100 and kernel-image-y blacklists e100, we have a syst
Your message dated Wed, 1 Dec 2004 12:45:53 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing this bug report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 18:09:02 +0900, Horms wrote:
>Did the install create an initrd imate in / or /boot ?
>If so can you symlink to it and use that?
initrd.img-2.6.8-1-686 was in /boot so I made a sym of /initrd.img to
/boot/initrd.img-2.6.8-1-686 and lilo was able to reconfigure.
I use the XFS fi
Le mercredi 01 dÃcembre 2004 Ã 18:48 +0900, Horms a Ãcrit :
> > Another example are the Realtek 8149 drivers. I had to blacklist one
> > of the drivers. This chipset is really common. So many people will
> > have to do this.
>
> If the blacklist exists for other devices, then yes this sounds lik
On Dec 01, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is the following: is the e100 driver available in all kernel
> flavours/versions ?
> If yes, then it is safe to blacklist it in hotplug directly.
But it's still not obvious that it's desirable: I hate that when someone
compiles his ow
just a followup, im using debian testing RC2
may be able to be combined with another bug
look at bug number 271315
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=271315)
(relating to the keyboard issue)
as well as 275485
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=275485)
(relating to the Ethernet issue)
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686
Version: 2.6.8-10
Severity: important
Hi!
Since the last upgrade of my Sarge machine (which bought in version
2.6.8-10 of kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686) I'm unable to load a couple of
modules. For example e100, mousedev, rtc, parport_pc, irda and a lot of
others.
T
Hello,
I think there is a problem with kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686, but I'm not sure
whether I messed up something...
I installed sarge on a SATA host a while ago (Intel ICH, worked just
fine!). Now I upgraded from the installer's kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386 to
version 2.6.8-10 of the kernel-image-2.6.
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:48:35PM +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If the blacklist exists for other devices, then yes this sounds like a
> good idea. The e100 should be used over the eepro100 as the later is
> in the process of being debricated upstream.
The problem is the following: is
Package:kernel-image-2.6.8-1-sparc64-smp
Version:2.6.8-1
Severity: Critical
Hardware: Sun Ultra2 with a cgsix framebuffer, dual 200mhz processors,
256 megs of ram and a 4 gig hard drive, am using it with a Sun Type 5
keyboard
After Install of the 2.6.8-1 package, Keyboard is dead, as well as
Ethe
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> Obviously, you cannot load the SATA modules if you need the SATA code to
> access the hard disc.
Of course you can, that's what initial ramdisks are for.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digita
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> clone 282814 -1
Bug#282814: installation-reports: [hppa] hardware detection & partitioning
problems w/ 2.6
Bug 282814 cloned as bug 283784.
> reassign -1 kernel
Bug#283784: installat
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 04:12:33PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > The 'install quik on a hard disk' step failed, saying that the root
> > > partition had to be ext2, while I had used ext3 (the installer's
> > > default). I chro
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:01:59PM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:42:10PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 01:06:17PM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> > > Package: kernel-image-2.6.9-1-686
> > > Version: 2.6.9-2
> > > Severity: critical
> > > Justificatio
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:06:04PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 30. November 2004 13:48 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> > On Nov 30, Jérôme Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Currently, I blacklist one of them in hotplug
> > > (/etc/hotplug/blacklist.d), but wonder if it should not be do
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 03:04:52PM -0500, Michael Lueck wrote:
> I have a Sarge install I have been keeping updated as the release draws
> closer. Today the kernel 2.6.8-1-686 (2.6.8-10) downloaded, along with LILO
> and some misc other things. During the install it said it was removing
> /initr
At Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:01:11 +0100,
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 Nov 2004, you wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:19:21PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Well, IIRC, it is enough to use _only_ the 32bit kernel, and that would
> > > make it easier for us, because we don't need an
Please read /usr/share/doc/libc6/README.Debian.gz Q6.
> ls: relocation error: libpthread.so.0: symbol _errno, version GLIBC_2.0
> not defined in file libc6.so.6 with link reference
You use non debian version ls, or you install your version in
/usr/local/bin, and so on.
Regards,
-- gotom
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:54:02AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Horms wrote:
> > The new packages are available, look for the ones dated 29th
> > November.
>
> Thanks, new kernel-source-2.4.27 works fine on alpha.
Thanks for the feedback. I am going to go ahead and upload the
packages. Th
Hi Joshua,
I compiled my own kernel 2.4.27 with the sources from kernel.org and with
that the telnet connections work! So the problem must be somwhere inside the
Debian
kernel patch.
Regards,
Raoul
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > The 'install quik on a hard disk' step failed, saying that the root
> > partition had to be ext2, while I had used ext3 (the installer's
> > default). I chrooted into /target and installed quik by hand and it
>
> Known problem. We
57 matches
Mail list logo
