please keep cc on list, if you want to send me private gifts than don't hesitate, but snail mail is usually better for that. ;-)
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004, David Koski wrote: > I chose one of the latest from the (woody) list provided by apt-get > kernel-package. BTW, with all the bugs and confusion I decided to start > fresh and boot from Knoppix, set up the raid-1 and install. The > whole reason for making a kernel was to have raid support built in. > > Also, woody requires backports of lilo and who knows what. I never > did get it to work. The whole idea of "stable" is looking less > attractive. I had to compile the kernel as root because fakeroot or the > a script is broken. That was a new woody "stable" standard > install. (Sigh..) you are mixing confusing statement: * you want to have stability, but advanced features that weren't stabilized for production use back then. * knoppix is fun and nice to play, but afair it's not an installer. try newer d-i rc2, it has very nice raid support. *) * report bugs against fakeroot if it does not work. it worked fine for me back the woody days. good luck -- maks kernel janitor http://janitor.kernelnewbies.org/ *) http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
