Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.6-generic_2.6.8-3_alpha.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-alpha/kernel-headers-2.6-generic_2.6.8-3_alpha.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-smp_2.6.8-3_alpha.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-alpha/kernel-headers-2.6-smp_2.6.8-3_alpha.deb
kernel-image-2.6-generic_2.6.8-3
Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.4-sparc32-smp_41_sparc.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.4-sparc/kernel-headers-2.4-sparc32-smp_41_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.4-sparc32_41_sparc.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.4-sparc/kernel-headers-2.4-sparc32_41_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.4-sparc64-smp_41_spa
Accepted:
kernel-build-2.6.8-1_2.6.8-2_sparc.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc/kernel-build-2.6.8-1_2.6.8-2_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-1-sparc32_2.6.8-2_sparc.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc/kernel-headers-2.6.8-1-sparc32_2.6.8-2_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.6.8-1-spar
Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.6-sparc32_100_sparc.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-sparc/kernel-headers-2.6-sparc32_100_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-sparc64-smp_100_sparc.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.6-sparc/kernel-headers-2.6-sparc64-smp_100_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-sparc64_100_s
Is there a problem with the idea of "turn off APIC timer before ACPI
initialization and then turn back on after ACPI initialization
finishes"? This is exactly what the tiny patch I've sent does. I would
agree that 'nolapic' boot param "solves" the problem, but IMHO the
idea above is clearer and wor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 254748 kernel-source-2.4.27
Bug#254748: kernel-source-2.4.26: Patch to enable Dell PowerEdge 750 SATA DMA
support
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `kernel-source-2.4.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> package kernel-source-2.4.27 kernel-source-2.4.27 kernel-doc-2.4.27
> kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27 kernel-tree-2.4.27
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: kernel-source-2.4.27 kernel-tree-2.4
Package: kernel-kbuild-2.6-2
Version: 2.6.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.2
kernel-source-2.6.5 was removed from the archive.
The build dependencies need to be updated to a current kernel version.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT p
Hi folks,
Is anybody working on this problem? It seems that
several people stumbled over this bug.
Regards
Harri
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 03:38:29PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> You are mistaken. The amd64 kernel has the 32bit emulation layer
> compiled in so it is fully capable of running an i386 linux
> installation. You can also install ia32-libs and the (not quite
> perfected) ia32-libs-openoffi
Your message dated Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:45:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debian kernel and swsusp
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 02:26:24PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> In RedHat I have seen config lines in fstab like
>
> LABEL=root/ ext3defaults0 1
>
> or something similar. If you label your root partition
> "root", then it shouldn't matter whether its /dev/sda1
> or /dev/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 246854
Bug#246854: kernel-image-2.6.5-1-686: LCD backlight stays on in S3 suspend
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reopen 264186
Bug#264186: No sound after suspend-resume on IBM TP A22p
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reopen 2531
Le Thu, 02 Sep 2004 07:20:47 -0700, Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit :
> Certainly, you nailed it. I just didn't talk about it to you, sorry :)
> But I'm also waiting for other fixes to get tested first, such as
> problems with EHCI. I don't want to have to upload kernel-source-2.4.27
>
Frédéric BOITEUX wrote:
I wonder if differences found between the two Debian kernels is due to the
split of patches
in small parts ? For example, I can't find ide-probe patch in the
kernel-source-2.4.27 patches ...
Certainly, you nailed it. I just didn't talk about it to you, sorry :)
But I'm also
Hello Maximilian,
Are you sure my problem is related to swsusp? If so then I don't
understand, and maybe you can explain it to me better...
If you are talking about this: http://softwaresuspend.berlios.de/
then I don't think we're talking about the same sort of "suspend". If
you check the kerne
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:10:15PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 07:53:28PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>> > I have installed Debian-i386 and Debian-amd64 on a new machine. For the
>> > i386
>> >
reassign 268899 kernel
thanks
Hi,
kernel-package does not install a build link in kernel-header
packages; instead, kernel-image, which owns the dir, and the build
link, handles it during post install. Whatever is creating the build
link in header packages needs to stop, and use the ker
Your message dated Thu, 2 Sep 2004 14:47:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debian kernel and swsusp
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Subject: Problems with some firewalls
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7
Version: 2.6.8-2
Severity: normal
Somewhere after the 18th of august I got problems downloading my mail from
pophost.ludd.luth.se. One of the administrators said that one possible
reason for this is that Linux can't handle that
Your message dated Thu, 2 Sep 2004 14:47:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debian kernel and swsusp
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Your message dated Thu, 2 Sep 2004 14:47:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debian kernel and swsusp
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 268899 kernel
Bug#268899: kernel-image-2.6.8-i386: "the directory /lib/modules/* still
exists."
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-package' to `kernel'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Yup, that worked great! But in addition to the sata driver, I also had to
add scsi_mod and sd_mod. Works great now, only I had to change the fstab to
use sda instead of hde. So in case I want to boot the install kernel again,
I am screwed, or is there a way to use a spe
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 07:03:09PM -0700, fdj wrote:
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 19:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
> From: fdj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: PDC20262 doesn't load w/2.4.27-686
>
> package: kernel-image
> version: 2.4.27-1
>
> reproduceable (
Ok I verified that:
* This issue is yet valid for current 2.6.8 with acpi=on
* It's valid for 2.4 series up to 2.4.27 with acpi=on
* Patch proposed in 2.6.8 does not solve the issue, so it can be removed.
The only workaround in all cases is the 'nolapic' boot param.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Hello
I noticed that the MAGIC-SYSRQ feature is not compiled in in all kernels
although there were requests for it on this mailing list and in the BTS.
Is there any reason against it?
This feature is especially on servers very useful to shut down the
system with synced and unmounted partitions e
Moin,
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 07:43:43AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >
> >The problem is, the kernel does not find the root filesystem, since it does
> >not detect the harddisk. This box (ASUS K8V mainboard) has one SATA disk
> >connected to the VIA VT8237 RAID controller, the Promise 20376 is no
Hello,
As other bug reports arise on DMA not working with 2.4.27 Debian kernel,
I've looked about
differences (as some described in my mail
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2004/08/msg01998.html)
about Debian patches between 2.4.26-6 and 2.4.27-4. So I'm looking in
debian/patches di
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686
Version: 2.6.7-2
Doing a tracepath6 (package iputils-tracepath 3:20020927-2) to a
distant IPv6 address on my IPv6-enabled laptop (a Dell X200) over the
internel 802.11b card causes a kernel burp, which kills the tracepath6
application. Lucky it doesn't bail the m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 269546 kernel
Bug#269546: PDC20262 doesn't load w/2.4.27-686
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image' to `kernel'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 09:33:25AM +0100, Alister Winfield wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 01:55, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> > alister.winfield wrote:
> > > LV Size1.95 TB
> >
> > I was under the impression that 2.4 could only handle <= 1TB sanely, not
> > 2. So probably the support he
Its definately just the 64bit number returned by BLKGETSIZE64.
The size returned by BLKGETSIZE is correct (eg is the number of sectors
for the device). As the code to return the size in the second case is
so similar its got to be something really daft causing the problem.
--
Alister Winfield <[E
On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 01:55, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> alister.winfield wrote:
> > LV Size1.95 TB
>
> I was under the impression that 2.4 could only handle <= 1TB sanely, not
> 2. So probably the support here is iffy.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong...
man vgcreate...
There is also (a
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:32:19PM +0200, ncrfgs wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 10:50:42AM +0200, Luca Bigliardi - shammash wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:06 PM, Luca Bigliardi - shammash wrote:
> > > sensors-detect find successfully ADM1030 device over
> > > uni-n 1 bus, but i cannot find
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Hi,
I have installed Debian-i386 and Debian-amd64 on a new machine. For the i386
install I used a sarge snapshot from July, which worked great. Only this
installed a 2.6.6 kernel, which I'd like to update to 2.6.8. On the AMD64
installation, I simply installed new debia
36 matches
Mail list logo
