Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.1
> reassign 255827 kernel-image-2.6.6-i386
Bug#255827:
=?iso-8859-1?q?kernel-image-2=2E4=2E26-1-686=3A_Reboot_the_system=0D=0AIn_a_?=
=?iso-8859-1?q?Asus_L3800C_laptops_is_not_possible_
Just for information, this issue seems to be specific to recent intel
motherboards and is discussed here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125841
tags +wontfix
thanks
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 06:21:29PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Package: kernel
>
> The debian installer is unable to modify disks on a machine with Mylex
> Acceleraid 170 RAID controller (DAC960 controller). This is because of
> the unusual device file scheme used by the d
Package: kernel
The debian installer is unable to modify disks on a machine with Mylex
Acceleraid 170 RAID controller (DAC960 controller). This is because of
the unusual device file scheme used by the driver with devfs file
system: the first logical disk is /dev/rd/c0d0 and the partitions are
/dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8
> reassign 264870 kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386
Bug#264870: radeonfb breaks the system
Bug reassigned from package `hotplug' to `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386'.
>
End of message, stopping process
Who is going to adopt kernel-kbuild-2.6-*? At least we should change
the Maintainer from Herbert to this list, but who is interested in
maintaining this package?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We currently have 2.2.25 (kernel-source-2.2.25) in the archive, while
2.2.26 has been available for quite some time fixing some important
bugs (http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.2/ChangeLog-2.2.26).
Can someone who cares about 2.2 please package 2.2.26 and get all the
dependent packages upd
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 05:46:45PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 05:35:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 03:06:07PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > The good news is that the Debian patch only creates files in debian/,
> > > which will make it apply clean
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 05:42:12PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 05:40:05PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > You are aware that the upstream maintainers announced a change in
> > their release management on kernel summit?
>
> I am part of the upstream maintainers, did atten
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 05:35:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 03:06:07PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > The good news is that the Debian patch only creates files in debian/,
> > which will make it apply cleanly even to vanilla kernel sources. Is it
> > planned (documented as
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 05:40:05PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> You are aware that the upstream maintainers announced a change in
> their release management on kernel summit?
I am part of the upstream maintainers, did attend kernel summit and
didn't see a big annoucement, just an discussion of exist
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 05:29:30PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 03:06:07PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > - However, Debian's new policy is to remove non-free parts of the
> > kernel.
>
> s/of the kernel//. But AFAICS there's been an exception granted for
> sarge, so
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 03:06:07PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> - However, Debian's new policy is to remove non-free parts of the
> kernel.
s/of the kernel//. But AFAICS there's been an exception granted for
sarge, so maybe we can add the firmware back except for those two cases
where the firmwar
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 03:06:07PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> The good news is that the Debian patch only creates files in debian/,
> which will make it apply cleanly even to vanilla kernel sources. Is it
> planned (documented as a committment of the kernel team) that this
> will stay that way? If
Sven suggested that I post a followup to this bug because I recently
encountered a related issue while testing debian-installer rc1 on my
blue & white g3 PowerMac (for reference, bug #264963).
I am trying to get the machine to successfully boot after an install
by the new installer, and I was aske
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 06:23:09PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Bernhard Reiter writes:
>
> > When activating the sleep by any method,
> > the machine does not try to wake up anymore.
>
> Seems as if the USB host controller driver, ohci-hcd, is the culprit.
> Make sure it doesn't get loaded (p
Hi,
in the last months, a lot of things have happened with regard to
kernel development and packaging. I have been trying in the last weeks
to assess these changes' implications on me as a somewhat advanced
end-user who is accustomed to building custom kernel .debs from the
upstream sources.
Let'
Your message dated Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:43:06 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262672: mkinitrd: cpio: modprobe.conf: No such file or
directory
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Thu, Aug 12, 2004:
> I think this is fixed in initrd-tools 0.1.73 in unstable; can you
> confirm?
Indeed, just got the package, and the cpio lines are gone. Thanks for
solving.
Regards,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: kernel
Severity: normal
On ultra30 (sparc64), the kernel reports an unknown cmd each time the pppd
starts on a DSL line.
The kernel shows :
Aug 9 11:35:12 calypso kernel: ioctl32(pppd:19255): Unknown cmd fd(6)
cmd(8936){00} arg(e7d0)
on socket:[194961]
Aug 9 11:35:48 calypso
* Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-11 16:22]:
> This bug seems to belong to initrd-tools, sorry for the mess, it wasn't
> that obvious.
I think this is fixed in initrd-tools 0.1.73 in unstable; can you
confirm?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
21 matches
Mail list logo
