On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 22:31:00 -0400, Archive Administrator wrote:
> kernel-image-2.6.7-i386_2.6.7-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
> localhost
> along with the files:
[...]
Packages are available here, as well:
deb http://sloth.voxel.net/~dilinger/kernel-image-2.6.7-i386/ ./
kernel-headers-2.6-386_2.6.7-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.7-i386/kernel-headers-2.6-386_2.6.7-1_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-686-smp_2.6.7-1_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.7-i386/kernel-headers-2.6-686-smp_2.6.7-1_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-686_2.6.7-1_i386.deb
to poo
kernel-image-2.6.7-i386_2.6.7-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.7-i386_2.6.7-1.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.7-i386_2.6.7-1.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.7-1_2.6.7-1_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-386_2.6.7-1_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.7-1_i38
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.70
Severity: normal
I've had to manually put sata_sis into /etc/mkinitrd/modules, as
mkinitrd isn't intelligent enough to figure out what modules my root
device needs.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /proc/partitions
major minor #blocks name
8 0 78150744
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:38:41AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> > Perhaps I should point out that my /etc/modprobe.d/istallion is the
> > following:
> >
> > options istallion board0=ONboard,0x240,0xe
> > install istallion /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install istallion; \
> >
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is also the way other distro works except in critical release
> situations which isn't the case for a patch like that.
It's not critical for sure, however I'd point out that it's nice to
have your PB/iBook beep before going to sleep because
Hi,
William Lee Irwin III writes:
> It won't take long for a problem report to roll in to justify turning it
> off in the .config anyway, so I'm not concerned if it's not immediate.
I only uploaded kernel-source anyway, so whoever does
kernel-image-i386 can still disable the config option.
Rega
On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 09:36, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> I'd be in favor of that also.
>> It was mentioned that this may cause complaints that the feature is not
>> present. I would rather risk that than other failure modes.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:32:23AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> If
On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 09:36, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 06:25:34PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> >> FYI, kernel-image-2.6.7-i386 builds fine w/ these kernel sources, as long
> >> as CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND=y (instead of 'm'; the modular swsusp patch is
> >> broken for 2
At some point in the past, hch wrote:
>>> Shouldn't we disable swsusp instead? The code is flakey at least and
>>> eats quite a bit of memory that seems to be scare on the boot floppies.
William Lee Irwin III writes:
>> I'd be in favor of that also.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 04:09:50PM +0200, Jens
(new) kernel-doc-2.6.7_2.6.7-2_all.deb optional doc
Linux kernel specific documentation for version 2.6.7
This package provides the various readme's in the 2.6.7 kernel
Documentation/ subdirectory: these typically contain kernel-specific
installation notes for some drivers for example. See
/usr
Hi,
William Lee Irwin III writes:
> > Shouldn't we disable swsusp instead? The code is flakey at least and
> > eats quite a bit of memory that seems to be scare on the boot floppies.
>
> I'd be in favor of that also.
Ah, too bad. I'm just uploading a new build that fixes kernel-tree
(most imp
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-2.dsc
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-2.diff.gz
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.7_2.6.7-2_all.deb
kernel-tree-2.6.7_2.6.7-2_all.deb
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-2_all.deb
kernel
Hi,
Thibaut Varene writes:
> The main difference (the only one _really_ noticeable) stands at
> very early stage, when lilo loads the kernel (and the initrd now).
> The "Loading Linux..." dot-bar progress message that used to
> last a couple of seconds is now taking tens of secs.
This is ver
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 06:25:34PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
>> FYI, kernel-image-2.6.7-i386 builds fine w/ these kernel sources, as long
>> as CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND=y (instead of 'm'; the modular swsusp patch is
>> broken for 2.6.7). If anyone's interested in the actual packages, I can
>> th
---
> Hi,
>
> Thibaut Varene writes:
>
> > agreed, though "it used to work".
>
> Once upon a time, the Linux kernel with all available IDE and SCSI
> drivers compiled in fit on a floppy disk :)
heh. You can still find distros with X11 on a floppy disk ;)
> > RE Jens' mail: the
On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 03:35, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> RE Jens' mail: the initrd used is the stock one, I didn't change
> anything (yet).
Please note that the initrd is generated when you install your kernel
(or when you tell it to do so...)
> I do agree that having tons of unused drivers builtin
Package: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686
Version: 2.6.6-1
Severity: important
I don't know when this started happening, but in the last 2 months or so, my
machine keeps rebooting when I try
to play sound, e.g. using ogg123 or playing a game (e.g. kobodl).
No oops, just a hard reboot.
Not sure if the
Hi,
Thibaut Varene writes:
> agreed, though "it used to work".
Once upon a time, the Linux kernel with all available IDE and SCSI
drivers compiled in fit on a floppy disk :)
> RE Jens' mail: the initrd used is the stock one, I didn't change
> anything (yet).
There is no stock initrd, the initr
---
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 10:21:23PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
>
> Well, we almost reached 4Mo of compressed kernel image on powerpc
with
> the non-initrd thingy, and it broke on some subarches (like prep).
So
> there is obiously a limit to the non-initrd kernels.
agreed,
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 01:06:06PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:29:18 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 02:26:08PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> >> * Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-23 15:21]:
> >> > I talked to Herbert and he
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:36:29AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> I wouldn't consider this sid-ready, as I
> a) forgot to remove the {arch} and .arch-ids directories
> b) didn't add myself to uploaders, and
> c) failed to mention that swsusp is now enabled statically in the
> changelog.
> If you
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 06:25:34PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> FYI, kernel-image-2.6.7-i386 builds fine w/ these kernel sources, as long
> as CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND=y (instead of 'm'; the modular swsusp patch is
> broken for 2.6.7). If anyone's interested in the actual packages, I can
> throw
23 matches
Mail list logo