At some point in the past, hch wrote: >>> Shouldn't we disable swsusp instead? The code is flakey at least and >>> eats quite a bit of memory that seems to be scare on the boot floppies.
William Lee Irwin III writes: >> I'd be in favor of that also. On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 04:09:50PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote: > Ah, too bad. I'm just uploading a new build that fixes kernel-tree > (most important), fixes a few other glitches (less important), and > moves the asfs filesystem from kernel-patch-powerpc into kernel-source > (mostly cosmetical). I could have dropped the modular-swsusp patch if > I had seen your message earlier. > Anyway, if you decide to fix modular-swsusp.dpatch, please leave the > old version in place, make changes to a copy, and put that copy in > debian/patches/00list-3. Otherwise the building of the monolithic > patches will fail horribly. I'll update the documentation for that as > soon as possible. It won't take long for a problem report to roll in to justify turning it off in the .config anyway, so I'm not concerned if it's not immediate. -- wli
