Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[snip]
> > Sven and I implemented both for the 2.6 PowerPC kernel packages. The
> > .config files are assembled from stubs, the largest of which is used
> > in all .config files. The kernel are initrd kernels, but need to
> > support more subarchs - currently they work
Jens Schmalzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Martin Michlmayr writes:
>
>> Some of the issues we'll have to think about are:
>
> Right. Here's my 2 cents.
>
>> - what kind of version control system are we going to use, how are
>> uploads coordinated?
>
> I don't care much, not being pa
Hi,
Martin Michlmayr writes:
> Some of the issues we'll have to think about are:
Right. Here's my 2 cents.
> - what kind of version control system are we going to use, how are
> uploads coordinated?
I don't care much, not being particularly familiar with either arch or
svn. If you ask me,
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:24:28PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> I simply do echo 4 > /proc/acpi/sleep.
Wow! That worked!
I just made my swap partition use the same key as my root filesystem.
Then I turned back on the swap support (restored the line I removed).
Then I quit X, ran your command, and t
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
>
> This ... sucks. It means that we have to setup both in case the system is
> sometimes resumed, but other times rebooted properly. Have you used swsusp?
Well you can have swsusp under cryptoroot as a configuration option
that
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 08:07:16PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:02:15PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> >
> > It looks to me like the initrd doesn't even need to setup root, right?
> > The boot process will replace the entire kernel, it's modules, it's idea of
> > root,
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:20:30PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > If yes, can one also use swsusp with the saved image on lvm device?
>
> Yes. In fact that's one of the main reason for having it as a module
> in the first place.
Ok, I've read up a bit more about swsusp.
It looks to me like the in
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:02:15PM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
>
> It looks to me like the initrd doesn't even need to setup root, right?
> The boot process will replace the entire kernel, it's modules, it's idea of
> root, everything. This means we just have to get the linux kernel to the
>
Galera,O que você acham do LIDS (http://www.lids.org)?-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Alan Lopes - Analista de Suporte Pleno FreeBSD User: 50874 | Linux
User:
264587
ICQ UIN: 29063718=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=É mais
fácil reparar Unix do que
9 matches
Mail list logo
