Kmail Timeout Settings

2004-02-21 Thread Dr.-Ing. C. Hurschler
Hi, I'm running KDE 3.1.5 in a testing/unstable system. I'm connecting to the internet with over ADSL and pppoe in demand mode. I've checked the log files and there is less than a 5 sec delay between the first ppp entry and the authenticated message after I try to check my mail with Kmail. I

Humorous Contradiction

2004-02-21 Thread Robert Tilley
I think it rather funny that KDE 3.2 is undergoing more testing to enter the "experimental"/"unstable" branches than it has to enter "stable". If this was a joke in bad taste...no offense was intended. -- Comments are appreciated, Bob

Re: Humorous Contradiction

2004-02-21 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2004 19:05 schrieb Robert Tilley: > I think it rather funny that KDE 3.2 is undergoing more testing to enter > the "experimental"/"unstable" branches than it has to enter "stable". > > If this was a joke in bad taste...no offense was intended. KDE3.2 never enters current st

KMail Progress?

2004-02-21 Thread Robert Tilley
Versions of KMail prior to version 1.5.4 would display a small progress indicator in the lower right-hand corner of the main window. This would indicate the status of the current mail download. It is not present in current versions of KMail. Am I mistaken or is there no way to visibly determi

kdm, kcontrol, and other problems under KDE 3.2 with Sid

2004-02-21 Thread James D. Freels
I have installed the un-released kde3.2 packages as recommended on http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKDE for Sid users who are impatient. These packages are very good indeed and thanks to those who have made them available. Here is a couple of problems I have had: 1) kdm does not work. The symp

Re: KMail Progress?

2004-02-21 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Saturday 21 February 2004 20.04, Robert Tilley wrote: > Versions of KMail prior to version 1.5.4 would display a small progress > indicator in the lower right-hand corner of the main window. This would > indicate the status of the current mail download. > > It is not present in current versions

Re: KMail Progress?

2004-02-21 Thread Magnus von Koeller
On Saturday 21 February 2004 20:33, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > I'm using IMAP - perhaps this is missing for local and POP > accounts? Nope, works here for local and POP (though I'm not using IMAP)... -- --- Magnus von Koeller --- email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] address: Interna

Re: kdm, kcontrol, and other problems under KDE 3.2 with Sid

2004-02-21 Thread Doug Holland
On Saturday 21 February 2004 12:11 pm, James D. Freels wrote: > > 3) There is not kcontrol icon in the Kmenu. I had to add this by hand. > YOu just about have to have kcontrol ! > I've had menu problems as well. For me, all the Debian standard menus disappeared. I deleted everything in .kde/sh

Re: kdm, kcontrol, and other problems under KDE 3.2 with Sid

2004-02-21 Thread Chris Cheney
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 02:52:52PM -0700, Doug Holland wrote: > On Saturday 21 February 2004 12:11 pm, James D. Freels wrote: > > > > 3) There is not kcontrol icon in the Kmenu. I had to add this by hand. > > YOu just about have to have kcontrol ! > > > > I've had menu problems as well. For me,

Re: kdm, kcontrol, and other problems under KDE 3.2 with Sid

2004-02-21 Thread James Stark
> 1) kdm does not work. The symptoms appear to be Xauthority related. > There is a temporary Xauthority file getting created in > /var/run/xauth/. After logging into kde using the kdm front end, the > system just does nothing. Nothing appears to be running inside of X. I > can get out with a cn

Re: Humorous Contradiction

2004-02-21 Thread Derek Broughton
From: "Robert Tilley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I think it rather funny that KDE 3.2 is undergoing more testing to enter the > "experimental"/"unstable" branches than it has to enter "stable". > > If this was a joke in bad taste...no offense was intended. There are a surprising number of people here