Am Sam, 2003-04-26 um 06.21 schrieb Chris Cheney:
> > For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem will be
> > fixed soon.
> >
> > What exactly is "soon", and what is holding this back? A fix has been
> > available for ages now.
> >
> > Yes, yes, yes I know that people are doing
On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 11:22:33AM +0200, No?l K?the wrote:
> Shouldn't we change from the one-maintainer-who-is
> doing-the-whole-kde-core-stuff to a small team like other successfull
> big packages (openoffice, gcc, libc,...)?
Volunteers, anyone?
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 26 Apr 2003 09:59 pm, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 11:22:33AM +0200, No?l K?the wrote:
> > Shouldn't we change from the one-maintainer-who-is
> > doing-the-whole-kde-core-stuff to a small team like other successfull
> > big packages (openoffice, gcc, libc,...)?
>
> Voluntee
On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 10:40:19PM +1000, Mark Constable wrote:
> I'd certainly be prepared to put some time and effort in as
> long as someone else has a clue of what actually needs doing.
Well, to be fair, it really does need a DD: no-one wants to sponsor KDE.
> Personally, I think every deb sh
On Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:05 pm, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 10:40:19PM +1000, Mark Constable wrote:
> > I'd certainly be prepared to put some time and effort in as
> > long as someone else has a clue of what actually needs doing.
>
> Well, to be fair, it really does need a DD: no-on
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 12:21:40AM +1000, Mark Constable wrote:
> Seems strange, it's a major open source system that would have a
> lot of Debian users.. is it because it's politically incorrect to
> use anything QT based or something ?
It's very, very big, and very, very hairy. Needs a lot of ti
On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 01:00 am, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 12:21:40AM +1000, Mark Constable wrote:
> > Seems strange, it's a major open source system that would have a
> > lot of Debian users.. is it because it's politically incorrect to
> > use anything QT based or something ?
>
>
> Volunteers, anyone?
When my DD application is accepted, I'd gladly maintain a few KDE packages as
well as work on a support website.
- Jarno
Has anyone done wine packages for kde3.1.1 on woody yet?
--
Earl F Hampton
http://hamiii.sytes.net/index.phtml
On Saturday 26 April 2003 02:17 am, Russell Shaw wrote:
> Frank wrote:
> >>From: Russell Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Date: 2003/04/26 Sat AM 02:50:40 EDT
> >>To: debian-laptop@lists.debian.org, Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Subject: Re: Screens Not Found
> >>
> >>Frank wrote:
> >>>Well I just ins
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 05:15:57PM -0700, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> > Educate the users, then? They must have been educated enough to _mount_
> > the shares, why not unmount them?
>
> Hehehe I see you don't work in the real world.. I hear this often from Linux
> Developers, but in the real worl
Stephan Binner wrote:
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57722
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-26 19:51 ---
Do work jpg wallpapers elsewhere in KDE
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 02:21:15AM +1000, Mark Constable wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 01:00 am, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 12:21:40AM +1000, Mark Constable wrote:
> > > Seems strange, it's a major open source system that would have a
> > > lot of Debian users.. is it because it
For those who haven't seen it :
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/04/23/2227240
gives a pointer to an article (dated 24th.April.2003) on optimising
KDE 3.1.x for i386 :
"This article goes into detail on optimizing KDE for speed. Typically,
most distributions include pre-compiled b
On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 02:45:01 +0100, Nick Boyce wrote:
>For those who haven't seen it :
> http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/04/23/2227240
>gives a pointer to an article (dated 24th.April.2003) on optimising
>KDE 3.1.x for i386 :
>
>"This article goes into detail on optimizing KDE fo
lÃrdagen den 26 april 2003 11.22 skrev NoÃl KÃthe:
> Shouldn't we change from the one-maintainer-who-is
> doing-the-whole-kde-core-stuff to a small team like other successfull
> big packages (openoffice, gcc, libc,...)?
I that that is an excellent idea. In my opinion KDE is just too big to
maint
16 matches
Mail list logo
