Re: objprelink

2001-09-16 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 07:57:12PM -0400, Jason Boxman wrote: > On Saturday 15 September 2001 06:03 pm, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 11:07:29PM +0200, Maximilian Reiss wrote: > > > qt-x11 (2:2.3.1-13) unstable; urgency=low > > > . > > >* Due to better sense don't use ob

Re: objprelink and lintian errors

2001-09-16 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 05:54:03PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > > > yes...that's a side effect of using objprelink. > > So does this mean package maintainers should stop using objprelink because > it's causing policy violations? Or is the lintian check slightly broader > than policy and objprelink

Re: objprelink and lintian errors

2001-09-16 Thread Maximilian Reiss
Am Sonntag, 16. September 2001 07:59 schrieb Ivan E. Moore II: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 05:54:03PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > > > yes...that's a side effect of using objprelink. > > > > So does this mean package maintainers should stop using objprelink > > because it's causing policy violations?

kde an objprelink

2001-09-16 Thread Maximilian Reiss
Is somebody up to build kde WITH objprelink from now on? Sadly I do not have the webspace where I could supply them as external apt source. I also use KDE on computers slower then 300 Mhz and would really like to have kde start in 10 seconds on them, not 43 seconds. ;-) Max

Re: objprelink and lintian errors

2001-09-16 Thread Stephan Jaensch
On Sunday 16 September 2001 13:39, Maximilian Reiss wrote: > > > > yes...that's a side effect of using objprelink. > > > > > > So does this mean package maintainers should stop using objprelink > > > because it's causing policy violations? Or is the lintian check > > > slightly broader than polic

Re: objprelink and lintian errors

2001-09-16 Thread Maximilian Reiss
Am Sonntag, 16. September 2001 13:46 schrieb Stephan Jaensch: > On Sunday 16 September 2001 13:39, Maximilian Reiss wrote: > > > > > yes...that's a side effect of using objprelink. > > > > > > > > So does this mean package maintainers should stop using objprelink > > > > because it's causing policy

Re: objprelink and lintian errors

2001-09-16 Thread Putz Ákos
Please, please, read the netiquette, and stop including the whole message when replying. My mousewheel is almost broken because of this :) To be on-topic : I didn't noticed any difference betweeen packages created with and without objprelink. Hmm, it is maybe my computer's fault? -- Putz Ákos

Re: kde an objprelink

2001-09-16 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 01:46:50PM +0200, Maximilian Reiss wrote: > Is somebody up to build kde WITH objprelink from now on? > Sadly I do not have the webspace where I could supply them > as external apt source. > > I also use KDE on computers slower then 300 Mhz and would really > like to have

Re: objprelink and lintian errors

2001-09-16 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 01:39:23PM +0200, Maximilian Reiss wrote: > Am Sonntag, 16. September 2001 07:59 schrieb Ivan E. Moore II: > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 05:54:03PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > > > > yes...that's a side effect of using objprelink. > > > > > > So does this mean package maintainer

Re: objprelink and lintian errors

2001-09-16 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 10:15:45AM -0600, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 01:39:23PM +0200, Maximilian Reiss wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 16. September 2001 07:59 schrieb Ivan E. Moore II: > > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 05:54:03PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > > > > > yes...that's a side ef

Re: kde an objprelink

2001-09-16 Thread Maximilian Reiss
> "On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 11:57:32AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Jakub, > >HJ told me that your work on the prelinker > > set to eventually be adopted into Linux. I ask > > because debian has started to use objprelink > > for now. > > If you ask me, I think it is a bad decision. > objpreli

SCSI (aic7xxx) and KDE

2001-09-16 Thread G . L . `Griz' Inabnit
Ivan, This may end up as 'off topic' as the worst thread so far. The situtaion is: I was given a fantastic (early) Christmas present, and it's causing me more gray hairs that I appreciate. Is KDE involved, yes. Is KDE at fault, I'm in doubt This mail is going to be long

Re: SCSI (aic7xxx) and KDE

2001-09-16 Thread G . L . `Griz' Inabnit
On Sunday 16 September 2001 13:21, G. L. `Griz' Inabnit wrote: > Ivan, Hey! You help me get this running, you've got a dualie you can compile on!! How's that for an offer? :--) -- __

koffice

2001-09-16 Thread matthschulz
Hi all, I put the line deb http://kde.debian.net potato main crypto optional kde2 in my sources.list, updated and wanted to upgrade to the new koffice. But apt-get is telling me: >apt-get -d install kchart Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Sorry, kchart is already

Re: koffice

2001-09-16 Thread Ben Burton
> Version: 1:1.1-beta1-0.potato2 > Version: 2.0.1-0.potato2 You're fine, you have the latest version. 1.1-beta1 is actually newer than 2.0.1. Originally koffice was numbered the same as KDE (2.0.x), and then it went onto a separate release schedule with its own numbering system (1.0, 1.1). Ben