Am Sonntag, 16. September 2001 13:46 schrieb Stephan Jaensch:
> On Sunday 16 September 2001 13:39, Maximilian Reiss wrote:
> > > > > yes...that's a side effect of using objprelink.
> > > >
> > > > So does this mean package maintainers should stop using objprelink
> > > > because it's causing policy violations? Or is the lintian check
> > > > slightly broader than policy and objprelink within the margin of
> > > > error?
> > >
> > > it's not a policy violation..I think it's just a side affect and a
> > > false positive.
> > >
> > > the only reason package maintainers should stop using objprelink is
> > > becuase it's a hack and not the correct solution.
> > >
> > > Ivan
> >
> > With now having kde starting MUCH slower. Great work.
>
> Yeah, that sucks. What's wrong with using the hack until the correct
> solution is available? Even the KDE folks recommend this.
>
Might be a problem to get KDE 2.2(.1) in woody. I don't know.
Max
