Re: amarok in wheezy

2012-12-01 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi Rainer! On Sat 01 Dec 2012 11:00:05 Rainer Dorsch escribió: [snip] > Do you agree, that it would make sense to have 2.6.0 in wheezy and that the > risk is to break something is very low (given the amount of testing 2.6.0 > saw in sid)? Well, as Modestas wrote: On Sat 01 Dec 2012 09:50:06 Mod

Re: amarok in wheezy

2012-12-01 Thread David Smith
n gstreamer) doesn't seem to be working in conjunction with the gstreamer phonon backend.. So I really don't know what to do or where to go from there so I pretty much gave up on it and started working on something else. Other than the above, and a graphical visualizer feature tha

Re: amarok in wheezy

2012-12-01 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Hi Modestas, thank you for the explanation, you should not feel guilty in any way, I appreciate all the great packaging work you do for the KDE packages. Do you agree, that it would make sense to have 2.6.0 in wheezy and that the risk is to break something is very low (given the amount of test

Re: amarok in wheezy

2012-12-01 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On Wednesday 28 November 2012 22:13:31 Rainer Dorsch wrote: > Hello, > > just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok 2.6beta1, > while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid? Wheezy does not have 2.6 Beta 1, but it has a post 2.6 Beta 1 snapshot. However, the diff between tha

Re: amarok in wheezy

2012-11-29 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Hi Martin, Am Thursday 29 November 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > How is Amarok 2.6.0-1 working for you, Rainer? Works very well for me, though I cannot claim to be a power user, neither can I claim it fixed a bug which was present in beta1 which affected me, though there is a list of about

Re: amarok in wheezy

2012-11-29 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Donnerstag, 29. November 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: > > Hello, > > > > just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok > > 2.6beta1, while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid? > > > > blackbox:~# apt-cache policy amarok >

Re: amarok in wheezy

2012-11-29 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: > Hello, > > just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok 2.6beta1, > while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid? > > blackbox:~# apt-cache policy amarok > amarok: > Installiert: 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1 > Installatio

amarok in wheezy

2012-11-28 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Hello, just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok 2.6beta1, while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid? blackbox:~# apt-cache policy amarok amarok: Installiert: 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1 Installationskandidat: 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1 Versionstabelle: 2.6.0-1 0