Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: > Hello, > > just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok 2.6beta1, > while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid? > > blackbox:~# apt-cache policy amarok > amarok: > Installiert: 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1 > Installationskandidat: 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1 > Versionstabelle: > 2.6.0-1 0 > 300 http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/debian/ sid/main i386 > Packages *** 2.6~beta1+75.g47e75df-1 0 > 500 http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/debian/ wheezy/main i386 > Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > blackbox:~#
Thanks for mentioning that 2.6 final is in unstable. http://packages.qa.debian.org/amarok => problems The package has not yet entered testing even though the 10-day delay is over. Check why. => http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=amarok => Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact debian- release if update is needed) Hmmm, might be a good idea if someone, preferably the maintainer I think asks for a freeze exception, provided that Amarok 2.6 is stable. Added KDE Extras list to cc. I will upgrade my systems to 2.6.0-1, have a go at it and report in a few days. How is Amarok 2.6.0-1 working for you, Rainer? Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201211291309.16581.mar...@lichtvoll.de
