Re: kompmgr

2005-03-26 Thread Zack Cerza
On Sat March 26 2005 11:09, Dennie Bastiaan wrote: > On Saturday 26 March 2005 01:45, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Benjamin Kudria [Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:52:42 -0500]: > > > Is there a reason kompmgr isn't included in the repository? I > > > understand that the packages are built with an XFree environ

Re: kompmgr

2005-03-26 Thread Dennie Bastiaan
On Saturday 26 March 2005 01:45, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Benjamin Kudria [Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:52:42 -0500]: > > Is there a reason kompmgr isn't included in the repository? I understand > > that the packages are built with an XFree environment in mind, but if > > kompmgr is included anyway, XFree

Re: kompmgr

2005-03-26 Thread Benjamin Kudria
On Saturday, March 26, 2005 4:57, A.M.P. Boelens wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:52:42PM -0500, Benjamin Kudria wrote: > > Is there a reason kompmgr isn't included in the repository? I understand > > that the packages are built with an XFree environment in mind, but if > > kompmgr is included

Re: kompmgr

2005-03-26 Thread Jean-Damien Durand
Transparency works fine for me as well (I recompiled the packages, though), with kde 3.3.2 & xcompmgr. But I wonder if others observed: Gdk-ERROR: "badmatch" with some applications. I got this error with xcdroast and pptpconfig at least. FYI the only workaround I found was, unfortunately! to disab

Re: kompmgr

2005-03-26 Thread A.M.P. Boelens
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:52:42PM -0500, Benjamin Kudria wrote: > Is there a reason kompmgr isn't included in the repository? I understand > that > the packages are built with an XFree environment in mind, but if kompmgr is > included anyway, XFree users won't experience breakage, they'll just

Re: kompmgr

2005-03-25 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Benjamin Kudria [Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:52:42 -0500]: > Is there a reason kompmgr isn't included in the repository? I understand > that > the packages are built with an XFree environment in mind, but if kompmgr is > included anyway, XFree users won't experience breakage, they'll just get a > 'g