Brad Rogers - 17.02.20, 12:40:42 CET:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:12:26 +0500
> Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
[…]
> >Do you mean one should install digikam instead of kipi-plugins now if
> >they need export from KDE apps?
>
> All I see here is that, despite the removal of kipi-plugins, digikam
> still h
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:12:26 +0500
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
Hello Andrey,
>Do you mean one should install digikam instead of kipi-plugins now if
>they need export from KDE apps?
All I see here is that, despite the removal of kipi-plugins, digikam
still has the export options.
Others have more
Thanks Rik,
I see they're now optional (digikam 6.4 depends no more on them)
and hopefully they'll land in sid in a not so distant future ...
Michal
On 17/02/2020 10:30, Michal BULIK wrote:
6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared ?
Or has it been replaced by s
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:05:01PM +0100, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Also, please note that they have been kept around after digikam totally
> dropped them just for compatibility purpose, but they are basically replaced
> by the Purpose framework also in the other projects. See also:
>
> https://mail.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:55:27AM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> You don't need kipi-plugins any more, also, kipi-plugins-common can go,
> too. In fact, upgrading (here, at least) required its removal. A log
> out and back in and all the export options still exist.
Do you mean one should install di
Rik Mills ha scritto:
> On 17/02/2020 10:30, Michal BULIK wrote:
>>
>> 6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared ?
>> Or has it been replaced by something else ?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Michal
>
> They were split to a new source by KDE, and made part of KDE
> applications
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 11:30:12 +0100
Michal BULIK wrote:
Hello Michal,
>6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared
>? Or has it been replaced by something else ?
You don't need kipi-plugins any more, also, kipi-plugins-common can go,
too. In fact, upgrading (here, at
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 11:30:12AM +0100, Michal BULIK wrote:
>
> 6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared ?
> Or has it been replaced by something else ?
Separate kipi-plugins 4:19.12.2-1 source package is in NEW.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
On 17/02/2020 10:30, Michal BULIK wrote:
>
> 6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared ?
> Or has it been replaced by something else ?
>
> Thank you,
> Michal
They were split to a new source by KDE, and made part of KDE
applications/release-service.
The new source
6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared ?
Or has it been replaced by something else ?
Thank you,
Michal
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:39:12 +0100
Antoine Pardigon wrote:
Hello Antoine,
what's the status now ? (not frozen anymore ?)
6.4.0 entered unstable today.
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:39:12 +0100
Antoine Pardigon wrote:
Hello Antoine,
>what's the status now ? (not frozen anymore ?)
6.4.0 entered unstable today. All things being well, it'll transition
to testing in five days.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:39:12 +0100
Antoine Pardigon wrote:
Hello Antoine,
>what's the status now ? (not frozen anymore ?)
I'm not one of the developers, so don't can't tell you what's occurring
or how long it'll take to get digikam moving again, but
All the work that's visible on the Debia
hello,
Am Freitag, 1. März 2019, 11:57:41 CET schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Dietz Proepper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a humble question - digiKam 6.0.0 is out some weeks now. Are there
> plans
> to
> package it?
We are currently frozen, by the way.
what's the s
13 matches
Mail list logo
